Neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer: an overview and review of recent clinical trials

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is long established as part of the multi-modality management of locally advanced breast cancer or inflammatory breast cancer, leading to significantly improved outcome. Numerous recent studies have compared the use of anthracycline-based NAC with adjuvant chemotherapy in earlier-stage disease, and have shown equivalent disease-free and overall survival rates with increased breast conservation rates. These studies have also shown that a pathological complete response after NAC is associated with improved long-term outcome. More recently, the taxanes have been introduced into clinical trials of NAC with increased overall and pCR rates. However, there is no evidence that the addition of taxanes to neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy significantly improves long-term disease free survival or overall survival. This paper reviews these trials, as well as trials of dose-dense and trastuzumab-containing NAC regimens. The review discusses the potential for NAC to replace prolonged adjuvant trials in the assessment of new therapeutic agents (using pathological complete response as a surrogate for long-term outcome), to be used as an in vivo chemosensitivity assay to guide further treatment, and to identify molecular markers that correlate with tumour sensitivity or resistance to chemotherapeutic agents so that the treatment of patients can be individualised.

[1]  J. Baselga,et al.  European Cooperative Trial in Operable Breast Cancer (ECTO): Improved freedom from progression (FFP) from adding paclitaxel (T) to doxorubicin (A) followed by cyclophosphamide methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) , 2005 .

[2]  A. Brufsky,et al.  Dose-dense neoadjuvant treatment of women with breast cancer utilizing docetaxel, vinorelbine and trastuzumab with growth factor support , 2005 .

[3]  Terry L. Smith,et al.  Significantly higher pathologic complete remission rate after neoadjuvant therapy with trastuzumab, paclitaxel, and epirubicin chemotherapy: results of a randomized trial in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive operable breast cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  H. Earl,et al.  Phase III randomized trial of doxorubicin and docetaxel versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as primary medical therapy in women with breast cancer: an anglo-celtic cooperative oncology group study. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  N. Gebbia,et al.  FOLFIRI regimen in advanced colorectal cancer: the experience of the Gruppo Oncologico dell'Italia Meridionale (GOIM). , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[6]  J. Blohmer,et al.  Doxorubicin with cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel every 21 days compared with doxorubicin and docetaxel every 14 days as preoperative treatment in operable breast cancer: the GEPARDUO study of the German Breast Group. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2005, Cancer.

[8]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Short-term changes in Ki-67 during neoadjuvant treatment of primary breast cancer with anastrozole or tamoxifen alone or combined correlate with recurrence-free survival. , 2005, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[10]  Roman Rouzier,et al.  Gene expression profiles in paraffin-embedded core biopsy tissue predict response to chemotherapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Invasive lobular carcinoma classic type: response to primary chemotherapy and survival outcomes. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  I. Zuna,et al.  In vivo chemosensitivity-adapted preoperative chemotherapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer: the GEPARTRIO pilot study. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[13]  M. Buyse,et al.  Randomized parallel study of doxorubicin plus paclitaxel and doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant treatment of patients with breast cancer. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  L. Brunereau,et al.  Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging underestimates residual disease following neoadjuvant docetaxel based chemotherapy for breast cancer. , 2004, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[15]  D. Wallwiener,et al.  Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in primary breast cancer. , 2004, Clinical breast cancer.

[16]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Postmastectomy radiation improves local-regional control and survival for selected patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and mastectomy. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Combined use of MRI and PET to monitor response and assess residual disease for locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[18]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Long-term outcome of patients with complete eradication of cytologically proven axillary node metastases after primary chemotherapy: The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience , 2004 .

[19]  R. Kreienberg,et al.  Dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin(E), paclitaxel (T) and cyclophosphamide (C) (ETC) is superior to conventional dosed chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients (≥ 4 +LN). First results of an AGO-trial. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  Terry L. Smith,et al.  The use of alternate, non-cross-resistant adjuvant chemotherapy on the basis of pathologic response to a neoadjuvant doxorubicin-based regimen in women with operable breast cancer: long-term results from a prospective randomized trial. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Proceedings of the Consensus Conference on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Carcinoma of the Breast, April 26–28, 2003, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania , 2004 .

[22]  J. Stec,et al.  Gene expression profiles predict complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel and fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  R. Jakesz,et al.  Monitoring of serum Her-2/neu predicts histopathological response to neoadjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy for breast cancer. , 2004, Anticancer research.

[24]  Matthew J Ellis,et al.  Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy as a Drug Development Strategy , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[25]  B. Asselain,et al.  Short and long‐term effects on survival in breast cancer patients treated by primary chemotherapy: an updated analysis of a randomized trial , 1999, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[26]  A. Hutcheon,et al.  Neoadjuvant Docetaxel in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[27]  M. Ellis Importance of correlative science in advancing hormonal therapy and a new clinical paradigm for neoadjuvant therapy , 2004, Annals of surgical oncology.

[28]  T. Petit,et al.  Comparative value of tumour grade, hormonal receptors, Ki-67, HER-2 and topoisomerase II alpha status as predictive markers in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy. , 2004, European journal of cancer.

[29]  S. Hilsenbeck,et al.  Neoadjuvant trastuzumab and docetaxel in breast cancer: preliminary results. , 2003, Clinical breast cancer.

[30]  J. Dixon,et al.  Current limits of knowledge in adjuvant and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy of breast cancer: the need for more clinical research. , 2003, Surgical oncology.

[31]  D. Wickerham,et al.  The effect on tumor response of adding sequential preoperative docetaxel to preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: preliminary results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  Darrell N. Smith,et al.  397 Preoperative trastuzumab and vinorelbine (HN) is a well-tolerated, active regimen for Her2 3+/FISH+stage II/III breast cancer , 2003 .

[33]  H. Dressman,et al.  Neoadjuvant comparisons of aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen: pretreatment determinants of response and on-treatment effect , 2003, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[34]  Syed Mohsin,et al.  Gene expression profiling for the prediction of therapeutic response to docetaxel in patients with breast cancer , 2003, The Lancet.

[35]  E. Mamounas Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant systemic therapy. , 2003, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[36]  Hans-Peter Sinn,et al.  International expert panel on the use of primary (preoperative) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: review and recommendations. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[37]  Barbara L. Smith,et al.  Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  Richard L Schilsky,et al.  Improved outcomes from adding sequential Paclitaxel but not from escalating Doxorubicin dose in an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with node-positive primary breast cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[39]  P. Bruzzi,et al.  Accelerated versus standard cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil: a randomized phase III trial in locally advanced breast cancer. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[40]  Barbara L. Smith,et al.  Preoperative therapy with trastuzumab and paclitaxel followed by sequential adjuvant doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide for HER2 overexpressing stage II or III breast cancer: a pilot study. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[41]  S. Steinberg,et al.  Preoperative FLAC/Granulocyte-Colony-Stimulating Factor Chemotherapy for Stage II Breast Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Trial , 2003, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[42]  L. Walker,et al.  Neoadjuvant docetaxel in breast cancer: 3-year survival results from the Aberdeen trial. , 2002, Clinical breast cancer.

[43]  Fiona J Gilbert,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: significantly enhanced response with docetaxel. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[44]  A. Vincent-Salomon,et al.  Incidence and prognostic significance of complete axillary downstaging after primary chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with T1 to T3 tumors and cytologically proven axillary metastatic lymph nodes. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[45]  D. Wickerham,et al.  Findings from recent National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project adjuvant studies in stage I breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[46]  J. Bryant,et al.  Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[47]  C. V. D. van de Velde,et al.  Preoperative chemotherapy in primary operable breast cancer: results from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 10902. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[48]  M. Ellis,et al.  Preoperative treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer patients with letrozole: A randomized double-blind multicenter study. , 2001, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[49]  W. Eiermann,et al.  Dose-dense doxorubicin, docetaxel, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support with or without tamoxifen as preoperative therapy in patients with operable carcinoma of the breast: a randomized, controlled, open phase IIb study. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[50]  R. Gray,et al.  Estrogen-receptor-directed neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: results of a randomised trial using formestane and methotrexate, mitozantrone and mitomycin C (MMM) chemotherapy. , 2001, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[51]  T. Fleming,et al.  Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[52]  P. Ravdin,et al.  Computer program to assist in making decisions about adjuvant therapy for women with early breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[53]  I. Smith,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer , 2000, Annals of medicine.

[54]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Prospective evaluation of paclitaxel versus combination chemotherapy with fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with operable breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[55]  K. Friedrichs,et al.  Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[56]  J. Bergh,et al.  Docetaxel compared with sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced breast cancer after anthracycline failure: a randomised phase III study with crossover on progression by the Scandinavian Breast Group. , 1999, European journal of cancer.

[57]  M. Tattersall,et al.  Initial paclitaxel improves outcome compared with CMFP combination chemotherapy as front-line therapy in untreated metastatic breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[58]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Incidence and impact of documented eradication of breast cancer axillary lymph node metastases before surgery in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 1999, Annals of surgery.

[59]  D. Richel,et al.  Prospective Randomized Trial of Docetaxel Versus Mitomycin Plus Vinblastine in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Progressing Despite Previous Anthracycline-Containing Chemotherapy , 1999 .

[60]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[61]  G. MacGrogan,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast carcinoma larger than 3 cm: a unicentre randomized trial with a 124-month median follow-up. Institut Bergonié Bordeaux Groupe Sein (IBBGS). , 1999, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[62]  T. Powles,et al.  A reduction in the requirements for mastectomy in a randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy in primary breast cancer. , 1998, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[63]  V Torri,et al.  Cytotoxic and hormonal treatment for metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review of published randomized trials involving 31,510 women. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[64]  Mike Clarke,et al.  Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials , 1998, The Lancet.

[65]  Anna L. Brown,et al.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[66]  F. Bonichon,et al.  Résultats à 10 ans d'un essai randomisé de chimiothérapie néo-adjuvante dans les cancers du sein de plus de 3 cm , 1998 .

[67]  L. Mauriac,et al.  [Results of 10 years of a randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancers larger than 3 cm]. , 1998, Chirurgie; memoires de l'Academie de chirurgie.

[68]  D. Wickerham,et al.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[69]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Combined-modality treatment of inflammatory breast carcinoma: twenty years of experience at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center , 1997, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[70]  M. Espié,et al.  Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil versus fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in premenopausal women with axillary node-positive operable breast cancer: results of a randomized trial. The International Collaborative Cancer Group. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[71]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Combined modality treatment of stage III and inflammatory breast cancer. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. , 1995, Surgical oncology clinics of North America.

[72]  G. Bonadonna,et al.  Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer: the results of 20 years of follow-up. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[73]  V. Semiglazov,et al.  Primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with primary radiotherapy alone in stage IIb-IIIa breast cancer. , 1994, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[74]  S. Ebbs,et al.  Chemotherapy and survival in advanced breast cancer: the inclusion of doxorubicin in Cooper type regimens. , 1993, British Journal of Cancer.

[75]  G. Bonadonna Evolving concepts in the systemic adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. , 1992, Cancer research.

[76]  A. Luini,et al.  Primary chemotherapy to avoid mastectomy in tumors with diameters of three centimeters or more. , 1990, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[77]  N Gunduz,et al.  Influence of the interval between primary tumor removal and chemotherapy on kinetics and growth of metastases. , 1983, Cancer research.

[78]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Multimodal treatment of locoregionally advanced breast cancer , 1983, Cancer.

[79]  Josef Korinek,et al.  Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology , 1982 .

[80]  N Gunduz,et al.  Effect of surgical removal on the growth and kinetics of residual tumor. , 1979, Cancer research.

[81]  B. Fisher Biological and clinical considerations regarding the use of surgery and chemotherapy in the treatment of primary breast cancer , 1977, Cancer.

[82]  F. Rosato,et al.  Diseases of the Breast , 1972 .

[83]  H. Skipper,et al.  Kinetics of mammary tumor cell growth and implications for therapy , 1971, Cancer.