In Silico ADME Techniques Used in Early-Phase Drug Discovery

The process of drug discovery and development is time consuming and expensive. In silico tools, in combination with in vitro and in vivo models, provide a valuable resource to improve the efficiency of this process. In this chapter, we provide an overview of various in silico tools and models used to identify and resolve absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) challenges in drug discovery. In general, structure-based in silico techniques such as docking and molecular dynamics simulations have limited applicability in the ADME space due to the promiscuity of many ADME targets and the limited availability of high-resolution 3-D structures. Pharmacophore models, a ligand-based in silico method, can be used to identify key structural features responsible for the interaction with the target of interest. However, due to broad ligand specificity and the probability of multiple binding sites in many ADME targets, pharmacophore models have limited prospective applicability across structurally diverse chemical scaffolds. Conversely, quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) models are capable of extracting knowledge from a wide variety of chemical scaffolds and have prospectively shown utility as predictive models for many ADME endpoints measured in the pharmaceutical industry. QSPR models, especially those based on machine learning techniques, are known to have limited interpretability. To address this challenge, the use of QSPR models is typically coupled with information derived from trends between ADME endpoints and physicochemical properties (e.g., lipophilicity, polar surface area, number of hydrogen bond donors, etc.) during drug discovery. Furthermore, knowledge extracted by the matched molecular pair analysis (MMPA) of ADME data provides insight that is used to identify fragment replacements to improve the ADME characteristics of compounds. In conclusion, an effective amalgamation of in silico tools is necessary to influence the design of compounds that will possess favorable ADME properties. Finally, in silico tools should never be used in isolation; they make up one arm of the integrated and iterative learning cycle that is comprised of in silico, in vitro, and in vivo models that we recommend using to effectively drive a drug discovery project.

[1]  Ajay N. Jain,et al.  Scoring functions for protein-ligand docking. , 2006, Current protein & peptide science.

[2]  J. Aqvist,et al.  A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design. , 1994, Protein engineering.

[3]  Jogoth Ali,et al.  Revisiting the General Solubility Equation: In Silico Prediction of Aqueous Solubility Incorporating the Effect of Topographical Polar Surface Area , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[4]  S. Ekins,et al.  Comparative Pharmacophore Modeling of Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptides: A Meta-Analysis of Rat Oatp1a1 and Human OATP1B1 , 2005, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[5]  T. Poulos,et al.  The structure of the cytochrome p450BM-3 haem domain complexed with the fatty acid substrate, palmitoleic acid , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[6]  Bruce A. Pearce,et al.  Modeling Chemical Interaction Profiles: II. Molecular Docking, Spectral Data-Activity Relationship, and Structure-Activity Relationship Models for Potent and Weak Inhibitors of Cytochrome P450 CYP3A4 Isozyme , 2012, Molecules.

[7]  R. Obach,et al.  Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance. , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[8]  Xiaomin Luo,et al.  In silico site of metabolism prediction for human UGT-catalyzed reactions , 2014, Bioinform..

[9]  Walter Langel,et al.  New insights on the interface between metal oxide and biosystem , 2014, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[10]  Barry C. Jones,et al.  DRUG-DRUG INTERACTIONS FOR UDP-GLUCURONOSYLTRANSFERASE SUBSTRATES: A PHARMACOKINETIC EXPLANATION FOR TYPICALLY OBSERVED LOW EXPOSURE (AUCI/AUC) RATIOS , 2004, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[11]  M. Karplus,et al.  Dynamics of folded proteins , 1977, Nature.

[12]  Kristin P. Bennett,et al.  RS-Predictor Models Augmented with SMARTCyp Reactivities: Robust Metabolic Regioselectivity Predictions for Nine CYP Isozymes , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[13]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[14]  Gregory W. Kauffman,et al.  Extraction of tacit knowledge from large ADME data sets via pairwise analysis. , 2011, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[15]  Yigal Brandman,et al.  Active-site residues move independently from the rest of the protein in a 200 ns molecular dynamics simulation of cytochrome P450 CYP119. , 2011, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[16]  J. Miners,et al.  Towards integrated ADME prediction: past, present and future directions for modelling metabolism by UDP-glucuronosyltransferases. , 2004, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[17]  Weihua Li,et al.  Effects of protein flexibility on the site of metabolism prediction for CYP2A6 substrates. , 2014, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[18]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[19]  Nina Nikolova-Jeliazkova,et al.  QSAR Applicability Domain Estimation by Projection of the Training Set in Descriptor Space: A Review , 2005, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[20]  Roy J. Vaz,et al.  The challenges of in silico contributions to drug metabolism in lead optimization , 2010, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[21]  David J. Schuller,et al.  Crystal Structure of a Thermophilic Cytochrome P450 from the Archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus * , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  David Rogers,et al.  Extended-Connectivity Fingerprints , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[23]  Kristin P. Bennett,et al.  RS-Predictor: A New Tool for Predicting Sites of Cytochrome P450-Mediated Metabolism Applied to CYP 3A4 , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[24]  Jin Liu,et al.  2D SMARTCyp Reactivity-Based Site of Metabolism Prediction for Major Drug-Metabolizing Cytochrome P450 Enzymes , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[25]  Vladimir Poroikov,et al.  Metabolism Site Prediction Based on Xenobiotic Structural Formulas and PASS Prediction Algorithm , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[26]  Xiaoqin Zou,et al.  Scoring functions and their evaluation methods for protein-ligand docking: recent advances and future directions. , 2010, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[27]  J. Dressman,et al.  In Vitro–In Silico Tools to Predict Pharmacokinetics of Poorly Soluble Drug Compounds , 2014 .

[28]  Natasja Brooijmans,et al.  Molecular recognition and docking algorithms. , 2003, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[29]  Jie Shen,et al.  Estimation of ADME Properties with Substructure Pattern Recognition , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[30]  Robert P. Sheridan,et al.  Random Forest: A Classification and Regression Tool for Compound Classification and QSAR Modeling , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[31]  Ákos Tarcsay,et al.  In silico site of metabolism prediction of cytochrome P450-mediated biotransformations , 2011, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[32]  Lester A. Mitscher,et al.  Glossary of terms used in medicinal chemistry , 1998 .

[33]  Jing Lu,et al.  Development of in silico models for human liver microsomal stability , 2007, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[34]  Visakan Kadirkamanathan,et al.  Lead Optimization Using Matched Molecular Pairs: Inclusion of Contextual Information for Enhanced Prediction of hERG Inhibition, Solubility, and Lipophilicity , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[35]  Mark C. Wenlock,et al.  How Experimental Errors Influence Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetic QSAR/QSPR Models , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[36]  Chris Oostenbrink,et al.  Cytochrome P450 3A4 Inhibition by Ketoconazole: Tackling the Problem of Ligand Cooperativity Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Free-Energy Calculations , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[37]  Imran Siddiqi,et al.  Solvated Interaction Energy (SIE) for Scoring Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities, 1. Exploring the Parameter Space , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[38]  S. Rick A reoptimization of the five-site water potential (TIP5P) for use with Ewald sums. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[39]  E. Paquet,et al.  Molecular Dynamics, Monte Carlo Simulations, and Langevin Dynamics: A Computational Review , 2015, BioMed research international.

[40]  Jeremy C. Smith,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Proteins:  Can the Explicit Water Model Be Varied? , 2007, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[41]  Daniel Moser,et al.  VAMMPIRE: a matched molecular pairs database for structure-based drug design and optimization. , 2013, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[42]  N. Vermeulen,et al.  Free energies of binding of R- and S-propranolol to wild-type and F483A mutant cytochrome P450 2D6 from molecular dynamics simulations , 2007, European Biophysics Journal.

[43]  S. Joshua Swamidass,et al.  Site of reactivity models predict molecular reactivity of diverse chemicals with glutathione. , 2015, Chemical research in toxicology.

[44]  C. E. Peishoff,et al.  A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[45]  Daniel P. Walker,et al.  Differences in CYP3A4 catalyzed bioactivation of 5-aminooxindole and 5-aminobenzsultam scaffolds in proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 (PYK2) inhibitors: retrospective analysis by CYP3A4 molecular docking, quantum chemical calculations and glutathione adduct detection using linear ion trap/orbitrap mass , 2009, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[46]  Gregory W. Kauffman,et al.  Interpretable, Probability-Based Confidence Metric for Continuous Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Models , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[47]  Weihua Li,et al.  Effects of protein flexibility and active site water molecules on the prediction of sites of metabolism for cytochrome P450 2C19 substrates. , 2016, Molecular bioSystems.

[48]  Daniel J. Warner,et al.  Matched molecular pairs as a medicinal chemistry tool. , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[49]  A. Tropsha,et al.  Beware of q2! , 2002, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[50]  Ron O. Dror,et al.  Exploring atomic resolution physiology on a femtosecond to millisecond timescale using molecular dynamics simulations , 2010, The Journal of general physiology.

[51]  Olivier Taboureau,et al.  Virtual Screening and Prediction of Site of Metabolism for Cytochrome P450 1A2 Ligands , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[52]  Daniel J. Warner,et al.  WizePairZ: A Novel Algorithm to Identify, Encode, and Exploit Matched Molecular Pairs with Unspecified Cores in Medicinal Chemistry , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[53]  Jens Sadowski,et al.  Structure Modification in Chemical Databases , 2005 .

[54]  Richard D. Taylor,et al.  Improved protein–ligand docking using GOLD , 2003, Proteins.

[55]  C. Spearman The proof and measurement of association between two things. , 2015, International journal of epidemiology.

[56]  Mohammed Al-Shalalfa,et al.  Prediction of novel drug indications using network driven biological data prioritization and integration , 2014, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[57]  Yi Li,et al.  In silico ADME/Tox: why models fail , 2003, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[58]  F. Russel,et al.  In silico identification and in vitro validation of potential cholestatic compounds through 3D ligand-based pharmacophore modeling of BSEP inhibitors. , 2014, Chemical research in toxicology.

[59]  Ian A. Watson,et al.  Integration of in silico and in vitro tools for scaffold optimization during drug discovery: predicting P-glycoprotein efflux. , 2013, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[60]  Fumiyoshi Yamashita,et al.  In silico approaches for predicting ADME properties of drugs. , 2004, Drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics.

[61]  Levi C. T. Pierce,et al.  Routine Access to Millisecond Time Scale Events with Accelerated Molecular Dynamics , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[62]  Markus A Lill,et al.  Potentially increasing the metabolic stability of drug candidates via computational site of metabolism prediction by CYP2C9: The utility of incorporating protein flexibility via an ensemble of structures. , 2011, European journal of medicinal chemistry.

[63]  Markus A. Lill,et al.  PharmDock: a pharmacophore-based docking program , 2014, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[64]  Peter Willett,et al.  Maximum common subgraph isomorphism algorithms for the matching of chemical structures , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[65]  Sanjay Joshua Swamidass,et al.  XenoSite server: a web-available site of metabolism prediction tool , 2015, Bioinform..

[66]  Markus A Lill,et al.  Prediction of Small‐Molecule Binding to Cytochrome P450 3A4: Flexible Docking Combined with Multidimensional QSAR , 2006, ChemMedChem.

[67]  Robert C. Glen,et al.  FAst MEtabolizer (FAME): A Rapid and Accurate Predictor of Sites of Metabolism in Multiple Species by Endogenous Enzymes , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[68]  Li Di,et al.  Development of QSAR models for microsomal stability: identification of good and bad structural features for rat, human and mouse microsomal stability , 2010, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[69]  Julian Tirado-Rives,et al.  Molecular modeling of organic and biomolecular systems using BOSS and MCPRO , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[70]  Julian E. Fuchs,et al.  Matched molecular pair analysis: significance and the impact of experimental uncertainty. , 2014, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[71]  Steven L. Dixon,et al.  Use of Robust Classification Techniques for the Prediction of Human Cytochrome P450 2D6 Inhibition , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[72]  Markus A. Lill,et al.  Combining Structure- and Ligand-Based Approaches to Improve Site of Metabolism Prediction in CYP2C9 Substrates , 2014, Pharmaceutical Research.

[73]  George Karypis,et al.  Comparison of descriptor spaces for chemical compound retrieval and classification , 2006, Sixth International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM'06).

[74]  Robert C. Glen,et al.  Cytochrome P450 site of metabolism prediction from 2D topological fingerprints using GPU accelerated probabilistic classifiers , 2014, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[75]  M. Machius,et al.  Interactions of substrates at the surface of P450s can greatly enhance substrate potency. , 2007, Biochemistry.

[76]  P Reddanna,et al.  Free energy calculations to estimate ligand-binding affinities in structure-based drug design. , 2014, Current pharmaceutical design.

[77]  Lars Olsen,et al.  Ligand-Based Site of Metabolism Prediction for Cytochrome P450 2D6. , 2012, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.

[78]  Effective water model for Monte Carlo simulations of proteins , 1995, Biopolymers.

[79]  J. Dearden,et al.  QSAR modeling: where have you been? Where are you going to? , 2014, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[80]  H. van de Waterbeemd,et al.  ADMET in silico modelling: towards prediction paradise? , 2003, Nature reviews. Drug discovery.

[81]  Scott Boyer,et al.  Assessment of Machine Learning Reliability Methods for Quantifying the Applicability Domain of QSAR Regression Models , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[82]  Paola Gramatica,et al.  Principles of QSAR models validation: internal and external , 2007 .

[83]  Jacob D. Durrant,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations and drug discovery , 2011, BMC Biology.

[84]  Gerrit Groenhof,et al.  GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[85]  R. M. Muir,et al.  Correlation of Biological Activity of Phenoxyacetic Acids with Hammett Substituent Constants and Partition Coefficients , 1962, Nature.

[86]  Stephen R. Johnson,et al.  3D Matched Pairs: Integrating Ligand- and Structure-Based Knowledge for Ligand Design and Receptor Annotation , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[87]  Qin Tong,et al.  Molecular fingerprint-based artificial neural networks QSAR for ligand biological activity predictions. , 2012, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[88]  Michal Vieth,et al.  Structure-guided expansion of kinase fragment libraries driven by support vector machine models. , 2010, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[89]  Daniel M. Lowe,et al.  ADMET rules of thumb II: A comparison of the effects of common substituents on a range of ADMET parameters. , 2009, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[90]  Cheng Luo,et al.  In silico prediction of cytochrome P450-mediated site of metabolism (SOM). , 2013, Protein and peptide letters.

[91]  Arthur J. Olson,et al.  AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[92]  Ruifeng Liu,et al.  Using Molecular Fingerprint as Descriptors in the QSPR Study of Lipophilicity , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[93]  D. J. Price,et al.  Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[94]  K. Jamil,et al.  Molecular docking of chemotherapeutic agents to CYP3A4 in non-small cell lung cancer. , 2015, Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie.

[95]  J M Blaney,et al.  A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[96]  J. Chaires,et al.  Thermodynamic studies for drug design and screening , 2012, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[97]  Robert P. Sheridan,et al.  Molecular Transformations as a Way of Finding and Exploiting Consistent Local QSAR , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[98]  Robert P. Sheridan,et al.  Time-Split Cross-Validation as a Method for Estimating the Goodness of Prospective Prediction , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[99]  P. Verhoest,et al.  Moving beyond rules: the development of a central nervous system multiparameter optimization (CNS MPO) approach to enable alignment of druglike properties. , 2010, ACS chemical neuroscience.

[100]  M. Shahlaei Descriptor selection methods in quantitative structure-activity relationship studies: a review study. , 2013, Chemical reviews.

[101]  Yong Wang,et al.  Site of metabolism prediction for six biotransformations mediated by cytochromes P450 , 2009, Bioinform..

[102]  Thierry Langer,et al.  LigandScout: 3-D Pharmacophores Derived from Protein-Bound Ligands and Their Use as Virtual Screening Filters , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[103]  David E. Shaw,et al.  PHASE: a new engine for pharmacophore perception, 3D QSAR model development, and 3D database screening: 1. Methodology and preliminary results , 2006, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[104]  Jameed Hussain,et al.  Computationally Efficient Algorithm to Identify Matched Molecular Pairs (MMPs) in Large Data Sets , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[105]  Sangdun Choi,et al.  A Combined Molecular Docking/Dynamics Approach to Probe the Binding Mode of Cancer Drugs with Cytochrome P450 3A4 , 2015, Molecules.

[106]  D. Young,et al.  Are the Chemical Structures in Your QSAR Correct , 2008 .

[107]  Yoshitsugu Shiro,et al.  Thermophilic cytochrome P450 (CYP119) from Sulfolobus solfataricus: high resolution structure and functional properties. , 2002, Journal of inorganic biochemistry.

[108]  György M. Keserü,et al.  Site of metabolism prediction on cytochrome P450 2C9: a knowledge-based docking approach , 2010, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[109]  J. Florián,et al.  Flexible docking-based molecular dynamics/steered molecular dynamics calculations of protein-protein contacts in a complex of cytochrome P450 1A2 with cytochrome b5. , 2014, Biochemistry.

[110]  Gabriele Cruciani,et al.  Predicting drug metabolism: a site of metabolism prediction tool applied to the cytochrome P450 2C9. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[111]  Jianpeng Ma,et al.  CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[112]  Osman F. Güner,et al.  Pharmacophore Modeling for ADME , 2013 .

[113]  Y. Vorobjev,et al.  Advances in implicit models of water solvent to compute conformational free energy and molecular dynamics of proteins at constant pH. , 2011, Advances in protein chemistry and structural biology.

[114]  Peter Ertl,et al.  The graphical representation of ADME-related molecule properties for medicinal chemists. , 2011, Drug discovery today.

[115]  Malcolm J. McGregor,et al.  Clustering of Large Databases of Compounds: Using the MDL "Keys" as Structural Descriptors , 1997, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[116]  Ge Qian,et al.  Molecular docking to understand the metabolic behavior of GNF-351 by CYP3A4 and its potential drug–drug interaction with ketoconazole , 2014, European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics.

[117]  N. Meanwell Improving drug candidates by design: a focus on physicochemical properties as a means of improving compound disposition and safety. , 2011, Chemical research in toxicology.

[118]  A. Mathiowetz,et al.  Deep understanding of structure-solubility relationship for a diverse set of organic compounds using matched molecular pairs. , 2011, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[119]  F. Lombardo,et al.  Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings , 1997 .

[120]  D. Stepensky,et al.  Prediction of Drug Disposition on the Basis of its Chemical Structure , 2013, Clinical Pharmacokinetics.

[121]  Eric F. Johnson,et al.  The Structure of Human Microsomal Cytochrome P450 3A4 Determined by X-ray Crystallography to 2.05-Å Resolution* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[122]  Feixiong Cheng,et al.  In silico ADMET prediction: recent advances, current challenges and future trends. , 2013, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[123]  Robert P. Sheridan,et al.  The Relative Importance of Domain Applicability Metrics for Estimating Prediction Errors in QSAR Varies with Training Set Diversity , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[124]  Arnout Ceulemans,et al.  Structure-based site of metabolism prediction for cytochrome P450 2D6. , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[125]  K. Yoshinari,et al.  Construction of a CYP2E1-template system for prediction of the metabolism on both site and preference order , 2011, Drug metabolism reviews.

[126]  S. Genheden,et al.  The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities , 2015, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[127]  Richard A. Friesner,et al.  Integrated Modeling Program, Applied Chemical Theory (IMPACT) , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[128]  Gerhard F. Ecker,et al.  In silico prediction of substrate properties for ABC-multidrug transporters , 2008 .

[129]  M. Lill Efficient incorporation of protein flexibility and dynamics into molecular docking simulations. , 2011, Biochemistry.

[130]  H. Kubinyi,et al.  Three-dimensional quantitative similarity-activity relationships (3D QSiAR) from SEAL similarity matrices. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[131]  Felice C Lightstone,et al.  Approaches to efficiently estimate solvation and explicit water energetics in ligand binding: the use of WaterMap , 2013, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[132]  R. W. Hansen,et al.  Journal of Health Economics , 2016 .

[133]  M. Gleeson Generation of a set of simple, interpretable ADMET rules of thumb. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[134]  Markus Christen,et al.  The GROMOS software for biomolecular simulation: GROMOS05 , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[135]  Markus H. J. Seifert Optimizing the Signal-to-Noise Ratio of Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Docking , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[136]  P. Selzer,et al.  Fast calculation of molecular polar surface area as a sum of fragment-based contributions and its application to the prediction of drug transport properties. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[137]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[138]  Matthew P. Repasky,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[139]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Simulations of Proteins in Water a , 1986, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[140]  David A. Winkler,et al.  Beware of R2: Simple, Unambiguous Assessment of the Prediction Accuracy of QSAR and QSPR Models , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[141]  Jozef Hritz,et al.  Impact of plasticity and flexibility on docking results for cytochrome P450 2D6: a combined approach of molecular dynamics and ligand docking. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[142]  Andrew G. Leach,et al.  Matched molecular pairs as a guide in the optimization of pharmaceutical properties; a study of aqueous solubility, plasma protein binding and oral exposure. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[143]  Weihua Li,et al.  Effect of Methamphetamine on Spectral Binding, Ligand Docking and Metabolism of Anti-HIV Drugs with CYP3A4 , 2016, PloS one.

[144]  J. Gready,et al.  Combining docking and molecular dynamic simulations in drug design , 2006, Medicinal research reviews.

[145]  I. Kuntz,et al.  The maximal affinity of ligands. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[146]  Sean Ekins,et al.  Pharmacophore modeling of cytochromes P450. , 2002, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[147]  T. Sjögren,et al.  Structural basis for ligand promiscuity in cytochrome P450 3A4 , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[148]  Ina Koch,et al.  Enumerating all connected maximal common subgraphs in two graphs , 2001, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[149]  Xuefeng Bruce Ling,et al.  Significance Analysis and Multiple Pharmacophore Models for Differentiating P-Glycoprotein Substrates , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[150]  Scott L Cockroft,et al.  The influence of nonspecific microsomal binding on apparent intrinsic clearance, and its prediction from physicochemical properties. , 2002, Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.

[151]  Maria I. Zavodszky,et al.  Distilling the essential features of a protein surface for improving protein-ligand docking, scoring, and virtual screening , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[152]  Frank L. H. Brown,et al.  Implicit solvent simulation models for biomembranes , 2005, European Biophysics Journal.

[153]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  The Amber biomolecular simulation programs , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[154]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Time-Efficient Docking of Flexible Ligands into Active Sites of Proteins , 1995, ISMB.

[155]  Vinícius Gonçalves Maltarollo,et al.  Applying machine learning techniques for ADME-Tox prediction: a review , 2015, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[156]  C. Wermuth,et al.  Glossary of terms used in medicinal chemistry (IUPAC Recommendations 1998) , 1998 .

[157]  Pierre Bruneau,et al.  A Database of Historically-Observed Chemical Replacements , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..