Considering relatives when assessing the evidential strength of mixed DNA profiles.

Sophisticated methods of DNA profile interpretation have enabled scientists to calculate weights for genotype sets proposed to explain some observed data. Using standard formulae these weights can be incorporated into an LR calculation that considers two competing propositions. We demonstrate here how consideration of relatedness to the person of interest can be incorporated into a LR calculation and how the same calculation can be used for familial searches of complex mixtures. We provide a general formula that can be used in semi or fully automated methods of calculation and demonstrate their use by working through an example.

[1]  M. Perlin,et al.  Validating TrueAllele® DNA Mixture Interpretation * ,† , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[2]  Duncan Taylor,et al.  The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles. , 2013, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[3]  D. Balding,et al.  Evaluating forensic DNA profiles using peak heights, allowing for multiple donors, allelic dropout and stutters. , 2013, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[4]  I W Evett,et al.  Evaluating DNA profiles in a case where the defence is "it was my brother". , 1992, Journal - Forensic Science Society.

[5]  D J Balding,et al.  DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands. , 1994, Forensic science international.

[6]  Domenico De Leo,et al.  Evaluation of PowerPlex® Fusion System on samples from forensic casework , 2013 .

[7]  John Buckleton,et al.  Relatedness and DNA: are we taking it seriously enough? , 2005, Forensic science international.

[8]  J. Buckleton,et al.  Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation , 2004 .

[9]  John S Buckleton,et al.  Autosomal microsatellite allele frequencies for a nationwide dataset from the Australian Caucasian sub-population. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[10]  James Curran,et al.  Searching mixed DNA profiles directly against profile databases. , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[11]  Steffen L. Lauritzen,et al.  Probabilistic modelling for DNA mixture analysis , 2008 .

[12]  Duncan Taylor,et al.  Using continuous DNA interpretation methods to revisit likelihood ratio behaviour. , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[13]  Duncan Taylor,et al.  The 'factor of two' issue in mixed DNA profiles. , 2014, Journal of theoretical biology.