Analysis of an explosion accident at Dangyang Power Plant in Hubei, China: Causes and lessons learned

Abstract On August 11, 2016, an explosion of a high-pressure steam pipeline occurred at a power plant in Dangyang City, Hubei Province, China. The accident killed 22 people and 4 people were injured. The causal factors of the accident were analyzed to prevent such catastrophe in the future. The entire accident process was divided into three sequential events for respective analysis based on timeline. Furthermore, a new model demonstrating the relationships among different causal factors was proposed and applied for this accident analysis. With respect to the power plant, the deficiencies from five causal categories were identified, which clearly demonstrated the accident mechanism from immediate causes to root causes. The results of the analysis indicated that unsafe acts performed by staff from different levels in power plant led to unsafe conditions, which were due to three factors, i.e., staff’s inadequate safety knowledge, weak safety awareness and bad safety habits. The elements in safety management system (e.g., “procurement,” “determination of applicable legal requirements and other requirements”) were not implemented and maintained. Moreover, the staff did not reach a consensus on specific safety beliefs (e.g., “safety is the first priority,” “the importance of top management commitment”), which indicated poor safety culture in the organization. Finally, in order to prevent the recurrences of similar accidents, the major lessons learned from this explosion were proposed and the application of the analysis results for related safety training was discussed.

[1]  Offshore Transport Accident Analysis Using HFACS , 2015 .

[2]  Andrew Hale,et al.  Culture's confusions , 2000 .

[3]  F. Guldenmund The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research , 2000 .

[4]  Fu Gui,et al.  Investigations into the Impacts of Enterprise Safety Culture and its Quantitative Measuring , 2009 .

[5]  Scott A. Shappell,et al.  A HUMAN ERROR APPROACH TO AVIATION ACCIDENT ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[6]  Zahid H. Qureshi,et al.  A review of accident modelling approaches for complex socio-technical systems , 2007 .

[7]  Li Jun Common factors leading to accidents and behavior type research based on prevention , 2005 .

[8]  A. Neal,et al.  The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior , 2000 .

[9]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem , 1997 .

[10]  Seokho Chi,et al.  Relationship between Unsafe Working Conditions and Workers’ Behavior and Impact of Working Conditions on Injury Severity in U.S. Construction Industry , 2013 .

[11]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  Development of a Hazard and Operability-based method for identifying safety management vulnerabilities in high risk systems , 1998 .

[12]  Gui Fu,et al.  行为安全“2-4”模型及其在煤矿安全管理中的应用 , 2013 .

[13]  A. Culyer,et al.  The effectiveness of occupational health and safety management system interventions: A systematic review , 2007 .

[14]  Rachael Gordon,et al.  Development of a methodology for understanding and enhancing safety culture in Air Traffic Management , 2013 .

[15]  J. M. Stewart Managing for World Class Safety , 2001 .

[16]  H. W. Heinrich,et al.  Industrial accident prevention : a safety management approach , 1980 .

[17]  T. Cox,et al.  The structure of employee attitudes to safety: A European example , 1991 .

[18]  James T. Reason,et al.  Managing the risks of organizational accidents , 1997 .

[19]  Dongping Fang,et al.  The nature of safety culture: A survey of the state-of-the-art , 2007 .

[20]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  A new accident model for engineering safer systems , 2004 .