Structural health monitoring of underground facilities – technological issues and challenges

Abstract Driven by the scarcity of land, many urban planners are seriously considering underground space to meet residential, commercial, transportation, industrial and municipal needs of their cities. Besides saving land resources, the benefits offered by underground structures include safety against earthquakes and hurricanes, and freedom from urban noise. However, owing to their unique design and construction, they call for rigorous structural health monitoring (SHM) programmes during construction and operation, especially when important structures are located nearby on the ground surface. Their continuous monitoring can serve to mitigate potential hazards, ensure better performance and facilitate in-depth understanding of the overall structural behaviour. This paper addresses major technological issues and challenges associated with structural monitoring of underground structures. A detailed review of the available sensor technologies and methods for comprehensive monitoring is presented, with special emphasis on conditions encountered underground. Practical benefits arising out of such monitoring are also highlighted, with the help of several real-life case studies involving underground structures.

[1]  Suresh Bhalla,et al.  Performance of smart piezoceramic patches in health monitoring of a RC bridge , 2000 .

[2]  Jianfeng Xu,et al.  Electromechanical Impedance-Based Structural Health Monitoring with Evolutionary Programming , 2004 .

[3]  K. G. McConnell,et al.  Instrumentation for engineering measurements , 1984 .

[4]  Suresh Bhalla,et al.  Structural impedance based damage diagnosis by piezo‐transducers , 2003 .

[5]  Craig A. Rogers,et al.  Qualitative impedance-based health monitoring of civil infrastructures , 1998 .

[6]  D. R Coutts,et al.  Monitoring and analysis of results for two strutted deep excavations using vibrating wire strain gauges , 2001 .

[7]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Overview of Piezoelectric Impedance-Based Health Monitoring and Path Forward , 2003 .

[8]  A S K Naidu,et al.  Damage severity and propagation characterization with admittance signatures of piezo transducers , 2004 .

[9]  K. J. Bakker,et al.  Soil Retaining Structures: Development of Models for Structural Analysis , 2001 .

[10]  Swee Chuan Tjin,et al.  A Pressure Sensor Using Fiber Bragg Grating , 2001 .

[11]  Ahmet E. Aktan,et al.  Issues in health monitoring for intelligent infrastructure , 1998 .

[12]  Jian Zhao,et al.  Effect of large excavation on deformation of adjacent MRT tunnels , 2001 .

[13]  William Powrie,et al.  Use of vibrating wire strain gauges to measure loads in tubular steel props supporting deep retaining walls , 1999 .

[14]  Daniele Inaudi,et al.  Low-coherence sensors for the monitoring of underground works , 1995, Smart Structures.

[15]  Piotr Omenzetter,et al.  Assessment of highway bridge upgrading by dynamic testing and finite element model updating , 2003 .

[16]  Pilate. Moyo,et al.  Structural performance monitoring and health assessment of highway bridges , 2002 .

[17]  Craig A. Rogers,et al.  Automated real-time structure health monitoring via signature pattern recognition , 1995, Smart Structures.

[18]  Ahmet E. Aktan,et al.  ISSUES IN INFRASTRUCTURE HEALTH MONITORING FOR MANAGEMENT , 2000 .

[19]  Suresh Bhalla,et al.  Calibration of piezo-impedance transducers for strength prediction and damage assessment of concrete , 2005 .

[20]  Jianfeng Xu,et al.  Generic Impedance-Based Model for Structure-Piezoceramic Interacting System , 2005 .

[21]  A. K. Pandey,et al.  Damage Detection in Structures Using Changes in Flexibility , 1994 .

[22]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  IMPEDANCE-BASED HEALTH MONITORING OF CIVIL STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS , 2000 .

[23]  Swee Chuan Tjin,et al.  Side-projected fiber-optic velocity sensors , 1998 .

[24]  Suresh Bhalla,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring by Piezo-Impedance Transducers. I: Modeling , 2004 .

[25]  Suresh Bhalla,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring by Piezo–Impedance Transducers. II: Applications , 2004 .

[26]  Kjetil Johannessen,et al.  Fiber Optic Condition Monitoring during a Full Scale Destructive Bridge Test , 1997 .

[27]  J.-G. Liu,et al.  Dynamic strain measurement with a fibre Bragg grating sensor system , 2002 .

[28]  Suresh Bhalla,et al.  High frequency piezoelectric signatures for diagnosis of seismic/blast induced structural damages , 2004 .

[29]  R. K. Goel,et al.  Status of tunnelling and underground construction activities and technologies in India , 2001 .

[30]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Comparative study of damage identification algorithms applied to a bridge: I. Experiment , 1998 .

[31]  Craig A. Rogers,et al.  Coupled Electro-Mechanical Analysis of Adaptive Material Systems — Determination of the Actuator Power Consumption and System Energy Transfer , 1994 .

[32]  Daniele Inaudi,et al.  Low-coherence deformation sensors for the monitoring of civil-engineering structures , 1994 .

[33]  Chris Rizos,et al.  Practical issues in using novel sensors in SHM of civil infrastructure: problems and solutions in implementation of GPS and fibre optic sensors , 2003 .

[34]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Improving Accessibility of the Impedance-Based Structural Health Monitoring Method , 2004 .

[35]  V. Choa,et al.  Underground cavern development in the Jurong sedimentary rock formation , 1999 .

[36]  Masoud Sanayei,et al.  Parameter Estimation of Structures from Static Strain Measurements. I: Formulation , 1996 .