Advanced information about target location facilitates movement planning: More evidence using a deadline procedure on movement time

Abstract It was recently shown that in a multiple choice aiming task the knowledge of the target location prior to stimulus introduction, even though the trajectory to follow was still uncertain, facilitated movement planning and execution (Girouard et al. 1987). In that particular study, the subjects had, in the first condition, knowledge about the target location prior to the stimulus presentation. In that condition, they started their movements in the direction indicated by one of four possible stimuli. However, they always ended their movements on the same target (single-target condition). In a second condition, there was always a one-to-one mapping between the stimuli and the targets (multiple-target condition). The facilitating effects of knowing target location were found for both the movement planning time or reaction time (RT) and movement time (MT). A possible explanation of the latter effect was that the subjects, somewhere along the movement path, made a check to see if their movement was carried out as expected and corrected it accordingly. The purpose of the present experiment was to see if knowing the target to reach before the stimulus presentation, even though the trajectory to follow is uncertain, could override the well-known effect of stimulus-response uncertainty on RT (Hick 1952) when the possibility of making a check during MT was reduced. To reach that goal the methodology used by Girouard et al. (1987) was modified by limiting the time permitted to execute the required response. The effect of this manipulation was that it almost tripled the target location effect on RT found in the previous study. Furthermore, the significant effect found on MT disappeared for the single-target condition whilst it remained significant for the multiple-target condition. Different interpretations are offered to take into account the latter result.

[1]  George E. Stelmach,et al.  Central and Peripheral Mechanisms in Motor Control , 1976 .

[2]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Control of multimovement coordination: sensorimotor mechanisms in speech motor programming. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[3]  L. Carlton Processing visual feedback information for movement control. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Characteristics of motor programs underlying arm movements in monkeys. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  D. Rosenbaum Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  R. Marteniuk Information processing in motor skills , 1976 .

[7]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Posture control and trajectory formation in single- and multi-joint arm movements. , 1983, Advances in neurology.

[8]  M. Hallett,et al.  Failure to confirm a correlation between electromyogram and final position. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[9]  Siegel Ds The effect of movement amplitude and target diameter on reaction time. , 1977 .

[10]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  Feedback versus motor programming in the control of aimed movements , 1975 .

[11]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[12]  Lorraine G. Kisselburgh,et al.  Rapid visual feedback processing in single-aiming movements. , 1983, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  W. E. Hick Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[14]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Invariant characteristics of a pointing movement in man , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  M. Sheridan Response programming, response production, and fractionated reaction time , 1984 .

[16]  M. Sheridan,et al.  Response programming and reaction time. , 1981, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  E. Megaw Direction and extent uncertainty in step-input tracking. , 1972, Journal of motor behavior.

[18]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  E. Bizzi 7 Central and Peripheral Mechanisms in Motor Control , 1980 .

[20]  B. Kerr,et al.  Preplanning for aimed movements: Disruption from a preliminary task. , 1983 .

[21]  A. G. Feldman Once More on the Equilibrium-Point Hypothesis (λ Model) for Motor Control , 1986 .

[22]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[23]  J. Requin,et al.  Movement Amplitude, Pointing Accuracy and Choice-Reaction Time , 1976 .

[24]  A. Welford Choice reaction time: Basic concepts , 1980 .

[25]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Parallel computations for controlling an arm. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[26]  O. I. Fukson,et al.  Adaptability of innate motor patterns and motor control mechanisms , 1986, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[27]  Peter F. MacNeilage,et al.  38 Distinctive Properties of Speech Motor Control , 1980 .

[28]  J. Kelso,et al.  Functionally specific articulatory cooperation following jaw perturbations during speech: evidence for coordinative structures. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.