The main protease 3CLpro of the SARS-CoV-2 virus: how to turn an enemy into a helper

Despite the long history of use and the knowledge of the genetics and biochemistry of E. coli, problems are still possible in obtaining a soluble form of recombinant proteins in this system. Although, soluble protein can be obtained both in the cytoplasm and in the periplasm of the bacterial cell. The latter is a priority strategy for obtaining soluble proteins. The fusion protein technology followed by detachment of the fusion protein with proteases is used to transfer the target protein into the periplasmic space of E. coli. We have continued for the first time to use the main viral protease 3CL of the SARS-CoV-2 virus for this purpose. We obtained a recombinant 3CL protease and studied its complex catalytic properties. The authenticity of the resulting recombinant enzyme, were confirmed by specific activity analysis and activity suppression by the known low-molecular-weight inhibitors. The catalytic efficiency of 3CL (0.17 ± 0.02 µM-1-s-1) was shown to be one order of magnitude higher than that of the widely used tobacco etch virus protease (0.013 ± 0.003 µM-1-s-1). The application of the 3CL gene in genetically engineered constructs provided efficient specific proteolysis of fusion proteins, which we demonstrated using the receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and GST fusion protein. The solubility and immunochemical properties of RBD were preserved. It is very important that in work we have shown that 3CL protease works effectively directly in E. coli cells when co-expressed with the target fusion protein, as well as when expressed as part of a chimeric protein containing the target protein, fusion partner, and 3CL itself. The results obtained in the work allow expanding the repertoire of specific proteases for researchers and biotechnologists.

[1]  N. Salakhutdinov,et al.  Triterpenic Acid Amides as Potential Inhibitors of the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease , 2022, Molecules.

[2]  N. Salakhutdinov,et al.  (+)-Usnic Acid and Its Derivatives as Inhibitors of a Wide Spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 Viruses , 2022, Viruses.

[3]  E. Volosnikova,et al.  Comparative Immunogenicity of the Recombinant Receptor-Binding Domain of Protein S SARS-CoV-2 Obtained in Prokaryotic and Mammalian Expression Systems , 2022, Vaccines.

[4]  A. Varnek,et al.  Pre-Steady-State Kinetics of the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease as a Powerful Tool for Antiviral Drug Discovery , 2021, Frontiers in Pharmacology.

[5]  E. Volosnikova,et al.  Design and Evaluation of Bispidine-Based SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Inhibitors , 2021, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.

[6]  Tao Hu,et al.  Purification and characterization of the receptor‐binding domain of SARS‐CoV‐2 spike protein from Escherichia coli , 2021, Engineering in life sciences.

[7]  I. Mazo,et al.  Expression of SARS-CoV-2 surface glycoprotein fragment 319–640 in E. coli, and its refolding and purification , 2021, Protein Expression and Purification.

[8]  N. Alcântara-Neves,et al.  In vivo cleavage of solubility tags as a tool to enhance the levels of soluble recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli , 2021, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[9]  C. Schiffer,et al.  Crystal Structure of SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease in Complex with the Non-Covalent Inhibitor ML188 , 2021, Viruses.

[10]  Yechun Xu,et al.  What coronavirus 3C‐like protease tells us: From structure, substrate selectivity, to inhibitor design , 2021, Medicinal research reviews.

[11]  W. Rabeh,et al.  Biochemical and biophysical characterization of the main protease, 3-chymotrypsin-like protease (3CLpro) from the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV 2 , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[12]  P. Sharma,et al.  Screening and evaluation of approved drugs as inhibitors of main protease of SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules.

[13]  Hualiang Jiang,et al.  Structure of Mpro from SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of its inhibitors , 2020, Nature.

[14]  A. Ting,et al.  Directed evolution improves the catalytic efficiency of TEV protease , 2019, Nature Methods.

[15]  Germán L. Rosano,et al.  New tools for recombinant protein production in Escherichia coli: A 5‐year update , 2019, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[16]  S. Yokoyama,et al.  SARS-CoV 3CL protease cleaves its C-terminal autoprocessing site by novel subsite cooperativity , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  E. Redwan,et al.  Production of Biopharmaceuticals in E. coli: Current Scenario and Future Perspectives. , 2015, Journal of microbiology and biotechnology.

[18]  Germán L. Rosano,et al.  Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: advances and challenges , 2014, Front. Microbiol..

[19]  Chung-Jr Huang,et al.  Industrial production of recombinant therapeutics in Escherichia coli and its recent advancements , 2012, Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology.

[20]  P. Zipfel,et al.  A fluorogenic substrate as quantitative in vivo reporter to determine protein expression and folding of tobacco etch virus protease in Escherichia coli. , 2007, Protein expression and purification.

[21]  Samuel Wagner,et al.  Rationalizing membrane protein overexpression. , 2006, Trends in biotechnology.

[22]  Dominic Esposito,et al.  Enhancement of soluble protein expression through the use of fusion tags. , 2006, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[23]  D. Waugh,et al.  Making the most of affinity tags. , 2005, Trends in biotechnology.

[24]  S. Edavettal,et al.  SUMO fusion technology for difficult-to-express proteins , 2005, Protein Expression and Purification.

[25]  G. Kneale,et al.  Attachment of a histidine tag to the minimal zinc finger protein of the Aspergillus nidulans gene regulatory protein AreA causes a conformational change at the DNA-binding site. , 2005, Protein expression and purification.

[26]  T. Copeland,et al.  The P1' specificity of tobacco etch virus protease. , 2002, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[27]  V. Gaberc-Porekar,et al.  Attachment of Histidine Tags to Recombinant Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Drastically Changes Its Properties , 2002, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[28]  D. Waugh,et al.  Electronic Reprint Biological Crystallography Differential Effects of Short Affinity Tags on the Crystallization of Pyrococcus Furiosus Maltodextrin-binding Protein Biological Crystallography Differential Effects of Short Affinity Tags on the Crystallization of Pyrococcus Furiosus Maltodextrin- Bind , 2022 .

[29]  E D Clark,et al.  Protein refolding for industrial processes. , 2001, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[30]  S. Batra,et al.  Relative position of the hexahistidine tag effects binding properties of a tumor-associated single-chain Fv construct. , 2000, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[31]  D. Waugh,et al.  Controlled intracellular processing of fusion proteins by TEV protease. , 2000, Protein expression and purification.

[32]  A. Bollen,et al.  Expression of a recombinant Toxoplasma gondii ROP2 fragment as a fusion protein in bacteria circumvents insolubility and proteolytic degradation. , 1999, Protein expression and purification.

[33]  B. Leiting,et al.  High-level expression of soluble protein in Escherichia coli using a His6-tag and maltose-binding-protein double-affinity fusion system. , 1997, Protein expression and purification.

[34]  T. Flatmark,et al.  Expression of recombinant human phenylalanine hydroxylase as fusion protein in Escherichia coli circumvents proteolytic degradation by host cell proteases. Isolation and characterization of the wild-type enzyme. , 1995, The Biochemical journal.

[35]  W. Dougherty,et al.  Molecular genetic analysis of a plant virus polyprotein cleavage site: a model. , 1989, Virology.

[36]  D. Ecker,et al.  Ubiquitin fusion augments the yield of cloned gene products in Escherichia coli. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  B. Slatko,et al.  An Escherichia coli vector to express and purify foreign proteins by fusion to and separation from maltose-binding protein. , 1988, Gene.

[38]  D. Smith,et al.  Single-step purification of polypeptides expressed in Escherichia coli as fusions with glutathione S-transferase. , 1988, Gene.

[39]  W. N. Burnette,et al.  "Western blotting": electrophoretic transfer of proteins from sodium dodecyl sulfate--polyacrylamide gels to unmodified nitrocellulose and radiographic detection with antibody and radioiodinated protein A. , 1981, Analytical biochemistry.

[40]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4 , 1970, Nature.

[41]  N. Burgess-Brown Heterologous Gene Expression in E.coli , 2017, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[42]  J. Tropea,et al.  Expression and purification of soluble His(6)-tagged TEV protease. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[43]  H. Togashi,et al.  Use of zeolite to refold a disulfide-bonded protein. , 2009, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[44]  Z. Su,et al.  In vitro protein refolding by chromatographic procedures. , 2004, Protein expression and purification.

[45]  D. Waugh,et al.  Escherichia coli maltose‐binding protein is uncommonly effective at promoting the solubility of polypeptides to which it is fused , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.