Recent Advances in Combinatorial Optimization

Combinatorial optimization is one of the most active branches of operations research. The essence of a combinatorial optimization problem is to find optimal solutions or near optimal solutions from a finite set of feasible solutions. In such problems, the size of feasible solution space usually increases exponentially with regard to the increase in the size of the input parameters. This issue, which has an acceptance rate of less than 30%, compiles six exciting papers. In the paper “Single Machine Scheduling and Due Date Assignment with Past-Sequence-Dependent Setup Time and Position-Dependent Processing Time,” by C.-L. Zhao et al., the authors study several objective functions including total earliness, the weighted number of tardy jobs, and the cost of due date assignment. They provide polynomial time algorithms for all the considered problems. In the paper “Scheduling Jobs and a Variable Maintenance on a Single Machine with Common Due-Date Assignment,” by L. Wan, the author derives some properties on an optimal solution for the problem and proposes an optimal polynomial time algorithm for a special case with identical jobs. In the paper “Due-Window Assignment Scheduling with Variable Job Processing Times,” by Y.-B. Wu and P. Ji, the authors prove that the problem can be solved in polynomial time. In the paper “Some Single-Machine Scheduling Problems with Learning Effects and Two Competing Agents,” by H. Li et al., the authors investigate three problems arising from different combinations of the objectives of the two agents. They provide a polynomial time algorithm for one problem and two polynomial time algorithms for the other two problems under certain agreeable conditions. In the paper “An Order Insertion Scheduling Model of Logistics Service Supply Chain Considering Capacity and Time Factors,” by W. Liu et al., the authors analyze order similarity coefficient and order insertion operation process and establish an order insertion scheduling model of LSSC with service capacity and time factors considerations. In the paper “Cooperative Fuzzy Games Approach to Setting Target Levels of ECs in Quality Function Deployment,” by Z. Yang et al., the authors develop a cooperative game framework combined with fuzzy set theory to determine the target levels of the engineering characteristics in quality function deployment. The papers published in this issue contain some interesting, creative, and valuable results and ideas. We do believe that all these papers will motivate further scientific research in combinatorial optimization and related areas. Dehua Xu Dar-Li Yang Ming Liu Feng Chu Imed Kacem

[1]  Gur Mosheiov,et al.  A note on scheduling deteriorating jobs , 2005, Math. Comput. Model..

[2]  Chou-Jung Hsu,et al.  Unrelated parallel machine scheduling with past-sequence-dependent setup time and learning effects , 2011 .

[3]  T. C. Edwin Cheng,et al.  Single-machine scheduling with time-dependent and position-dependent deteriorating jobs , 2015, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[4]  Vitaly A. Strusevich,et al.  Simple matching vs linear assignment in scheduling models with positional effects: A critical review , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Gur Mosheiov,et al.  Scheduling problems with a learning effect , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Christos Koulamas,et al.  Single-machine scheduling problems with past-sequence-dependent setup times , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Chin-Chia Wu,et al.  Genetic algorithm for minimizing the total weighted completion time scheduling problem with learning and release times , 2011, Comput. Oper. Res..

[8]  Wen-Chiung Lee,et al.  Single-machine scheduling with past-sequence-dependent setup times and general effects of deterioration and learning , 2014, Optim. Lett..

[9]  Dvir Shabtay,et al.  Two due date assignment problems in scheduling a single machine , 2006, Oper. Res. Lett..

[10]  Ji-Bo Wang,et al.  Flow shop scheduling jobs with position-dependent processing times , 2005 .

[11]  Gang Li,et al.  Single machine scheduling with general time-dependent deterioration, position-dependent learning and past-sequence-dependent setup times , 2013, Optim. Lett..

[12]  Liang-Hsuan Chen,et al.  An approach of new product planning using quality function deployment and fuzzy linear programming model , 2014 .

[13]  Vitaly A. Strusevich,et al.  Single machine scheduling and due date assignment with positionally dependent processing times , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Multi-objective Optimization Approach to Product-planning in Quality Function Deployment Incorporated with Fuzzy-ANP , 2014 .

[15]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  Four single-machine scheduling problems involving due date determination decisions , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[16]  T. C. Edwin Cheng,et al.  Parallel Machine Scheduling to Minimize Costs for Earliness and Number of Tardy Jobs , 1993, Discret. Appl. Math..

[17]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  Due-date assignment and single-machine scheduling with generalised position-dependent deteriorating jobs and deteriorating multi-maintenance activities , 2014 .

[18]  Wen-Chiung Lee,et al.  Heuristic algorithms for solving the maximum lateness scheduling problem with learning considerations , 2007, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[19]  Dehua Xu,et al.  Some single-machine scheduling problems with past-sequence-dependent setup times and a general learning effect , 2010 .

[20]  Guoqing Wang,et al.  Single Machine Scheduling with Learning Effect Considerations , 2000, Ann. Oper. Res..

[21]  Dar-Li Yang,et al.  Minimizing the makespan in a single-machine scheduling problem with the cyclic process of an aging effect , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[22]  Chuanli Zhao,et al.  Single machine scheduling with general job-dependent aging effect and maintenance activities to minimize makespan , 2010 .

[23]  Chunqing Wu,et al.  Minimizing the maximum lateness in a single-machine scheduling problem with the normal time-dependent and job-dependent learning effect , 2012, Appl. Math. Comput..

[24]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  Scheduling with Time-Dependent Processing Times 2015 , 2014 .

[25]  Adam Janiak,et al.  Scheduling jobs under an aging effect , 2010, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[26]  Dirk Biskup,et al.  Single-machine scheduling with learning considerations , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Chengbin Chu,et al.  A survey of the state-of-the-art of common due date assignment and scheduling research , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Adam Janiak,et al.  Scheduling jobs with position-dependent processing times , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[29]  Dirk Biskup,et al.  A state-of-the-art review on scheduling with learning effects , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Gur Mosheiov,et al.  Scheduling with general job-dependent learning curves , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  Christos Koulamas,et al.  A faster algorithm for a due date assignment problem with tardy jobs , 2010, Oper. Res. Lett..

[32]  Vitaly A. Strusevich,et al.  Single machine scheduling with general positional deterioration and rate-modifying maintenance , 2012 .

[33]  Gur Mosheiov,et al.  Proportionate flowshops with general position-dependent processing times , 2011, Inf. Process. Lett..

[34]  Ji-Bo Wang,et al.  Single-machine scheduling with past-sequence-dependent setup times and time-dependent learning effect , 2008, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[35]  Suh-Jenq Yang,et al.  Two due date assignment problems with position-dependent processing time on a single-machine , 2011, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[36]  Gur Mosheiov,et al.  Parallel machine scheduling with a learning effect , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..