An evaluation of DNA extraction methods on historical and roadkill mammalian specimen

[1]  R. Bradley,et al.  Temporal rate of postmortem DNA degradation in archived tissue samples: evidence from liver and muscle , 2022, Journal of Mammalogy.

[2]  M. McGowen,et al.  A comparative analysis of extraction protocol performance on degraded mammalian museum specimens , 2022, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

[3]  V. Rohwer,et al.  Declining growth of natural history collections fails future generations , 2022, PLoS biology.

[4]  Kristijn R. R. Swinnen,et al.  ‘Animals under wheels’: Wildlife roadkill data collection by citizen scientists as a part of their nature recording activities , 2022, Nature Conservation.

[5]  K. Matsuo.  Evaluation of methods for plant genomic DNA sequence analysis without DNA and PCR product purification. , 2021, Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology.

[6]  T. R. Golla,et al.  A New Non-invasive Method for Collecting DNA From Small Mammals in the Field, and Its Application in Simultaneous Vector and Disease Monitoring in Brushtail Possums , 2021, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[7]  C. Raxworthy,et al.  Mining museums for historical DNA: advances and challenges in museomics. , 2021, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  K. de Queiroz,et al.  Genomic library preparation and hybridization capture of formalin‐fixed tissues and allozyme supernatant for population genomics and considerations for combining capture‐ and RADseq‐based single nucleotide polymorphism data sets , 2021, Molecular ecology resources.

[9]  Melissa T. R. Hawkins,et al.  Assessing genotyping errors in mammalian museum study skins using high-throughput genotyping-by-sequencing , 2021, Conservation Genetics Resources.

[10]  M. Hofreiter,et al.  Successful application of ancient DNA extraction and library construction protocols to museum wet collection specimens , 2021, Molecular ecology resources.

[11]  D. Gardiner,et al.  Unlocking inaccessible historical genomes preserved in formalin , 2021, bioRxiv.

[12]  R. Gundry,et al.  Facile Preparation of Peptides for Mass Spectrometry Analysis in Bottom‐Up Proteomics Workflows , 2021, Current protocols.

[13]  Céline Scornavacca,et al.  High-quality carnivoran genomes from roadkill samples enable comparative species delineation in aardwolf and bat-eared fox , 2021, eLife.

[14]  W. Parson,et al.  Evaluation of DNA Extraction Methods Developed for Forensic and Ancient DNA Applications Using Bone Samples of Different Age , 2021, Genes.

[15]  James M. Maley,et al.  More than skin and bones: Comparing extraction methods and alternative sources of DNA from avian museum specimens , 2020, Molecular ecology resources.

[16]  N. Wahlberg,et al.  Museomics of a rare taxon: placing Whalleyanidae in the Lepidoptera Tree of Life , 2020, bioRxiv.

[17]  C. Grilo,et al.  Roadkill risk and population vulnerability in European birds and mammals , 2020, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

[18]  J. Leonard,et al.  Mitogenomes Reveal Multiple Colonization of Mountains by Rattus in Sundaland , 2020, The Journal of heredity.

[19]  Don E. Wilson,et al.  Museomics of tree squirrels: a dense taxon sampling of mitogenomes reveals hidden diversity, phenotypic convergence, and the need of a taxonomic overhaul , 2020, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[20]  R. Ismagilov,et al.  Two-phase wash to solve the ubiquitous contaminant-carryover problem in commercial nucleic-acid extraction kits , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[21]  F. Shilling,et al.  The value of monitoring wildlife roadkill , 2020, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[22]  F. Wan,et al.  Comparative analysis of eight DNA extraction methods for molecular research in mealybugs , 2019, PloS one.

[23]  T. Maigret.  Snake scale clips as a source of high quality DNA suitable for RAD sequencing , 2019, Conservation Genetics Resources.

[24]  L. Joseph,et al.  Museum specimens provide reliable SNP data for population genomic analysis of a widely distributed but threatened cockatoo species , 2019, Molecular ecology resources.

[25]  A. McGaughran.  Effects of sample age on data quality from targeted sequencing of museum specimens: what are we capturing in time? , 2019, BMC Genomics.

[26]  J. Walsh,et al.  Historical DNA as a tool to address key questions in avian biology and evolution: A review of methods, challenges, applications, and future directions , 2019, Molecular ecology resources.

[27]  R. Chaudhary,et al.  Comparison of UV spectrometry and fluorometry-based methods for quantification of cell-free DNA in red cell components , 2019, Asian journal of transfusion science.

[28]  R. Yarnell,et al.  Reduced occupancy of hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus) in rural England and Wales: The influence of habitat and an asymmetric intra-guild predator , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[29]  William M. Mauck,et al.  Uneven Missing Data Skew Phylogenomic Relationships within the Lories and Lorikeets , 2018, bioRxiv.

[30]  M. G. Campana,et al.  Performance of commonly requested destructive museum samples for mammalian genomic studies , 2018, Journal of Mammalogy.

[31]  Anastacia M. Garcia,et al.  Optimization of phenol-chloroform RNA extraction , 2018, MethodsX.

[32]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .

[33]  John S. Sproul,et al.  Sequencing historical specimens: successful preparation of small specimens with low amounts of degraded DNA , 2017, Molecular ecology resources.

[34]  R. Vasconcelos,et al.  Phylogeography of the Small Indian Civet and Origin of Introductions to Western Indian Ocean Islands , 2016, The Journal of heredity.

[35]  Travis C Glenn,et al.  Avoiding Missing Data Biases in Phylogenomic Inference: An Empirical Study in the Landfowl (Aves: Galliformes). , 2016, Molecular biology and evolution.

[36]  M. Esumi,et al.  Pitfalls of DNA Quantification Using DNA-Binding Fluorescent Dyes and Suggested Solutions , 2016, PloS one.

[37]  H. Rusterholz,et al.  DNA Quantity and Quality in Remnants of Traffic-Killed Specimens of an Endangered Longhorn Beetle: A Comparison of Different Methods , 2015, Journal of insect science.

[38]  A. R. dos Santos,et al.  Using DNA Barcodes to Identify Road-Killed Animals in Two Atlantic Forest Nature Reserves, Brazil , 2015, PloS one.

[39]  P. Brockhoff,et al.  Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2015 .

[40]  G. Banos,et al.  Comparison of Eleven Methods for Genomic DNA Extraction Suitable for Large-Scale Whole-Genome Genotyping and Long-Term DNA Banking Using Blood Samples , 2015, PloS one.

[41]  Cristina E. Valdiosera,et al.  Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of a Middle Pleistocene cave bear reconstructed from ultrashort DNA fragments , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  M. Slatkin,et al.  Genomic Evidence for Island Population Conversion Resolves Conflicting Theories of Polar Bear Evolution , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[43]  L. Andersson,et al.  The genetic origin and history of speed in the Thoroughbred racehorse , 2012, Nature Communications.

[44]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[45]  V. Carey,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus , 2001 .

[46]  M. Huijser,et al.  The effect of roads and traffic on hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus) populations , 2000 .

[47]  C. Frissell,et al.  Review of Ecological Effects of Roads on Terrestrial and Aquatic Communities , 2000 .

[48]  Ewa M. Bielihska,et al.  COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS , 1994 .