A comparative analysis of non rigid registration methods in atlas-based segmentation of subcortical structures

In this paper we propose an atlas-based segmentation technique for subcortical structures in 3D MR images using non-rigid image registration. Further we evaluate two separate transformation models used in non-rigid registration method, namely, Thin Plate Splines (TPS) and Cubic B Splines (CBS). The optimization technique used for the registration process was Powell's method and the similarity measure used for TPS based registration was normalized mutual information whereas normalized cross correlation was used in CBS based registration algorithm. The results of automatically segmented structures (which include ventricles, caudate nucleus and putamen) obtained via atlas-subject registration were assessed against manual segmentation, using sensitivity (S), positive predictive value (P) and Dice coefficient (D) metrics. The mean ± std values of S, P and D are 0.92 ± 0.01, 0.93 ± 0.01, 0.93 ± 0.01 respectively in case of CBS whereas 0.85 ± 0.01, 0.85 ± 0.01, 0.84 ± 0.02 are the mean ± std values of S, P and D respectively in case of TPS. Thus results indicate that the better approach to segment the subcortical structures, both in terms of speed and accuracy, is by using CBS based non-rigid registration algorithm.

[1]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Voxel similarity measures for 3-D serial MR brain image registration , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  A Bayesian model for joint segmentation and registration , 2006, NeuroImage.

[3]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  D. Kennedy,et al.  Anatomic segmentation and volumetric calculations in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[5]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Voxel Similarity Measures for 3D Serial MR Brain Image Registration , 2000, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[6]  R P Velthuizen,et al.  MRI segmentation: methods and applications. , 1995, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[7]  Dominique Hasboun,et al.  Anatomically constrained region deformation for the automated segmentation of the hippocampus and the amygdala: Method and validation on controls and patients with Alzheimer’s disease , 2007, NeuroImage.

[8]  K. Hamrouni,et al.  Level set method based on a statistical shape constraint for MRI brain segmentation , 2010, Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine.

[9]  Martin Styner,et al.  Subcortical structure segmentation using probabilistic atlas priors , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[10]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  Francisco Javier Martínez de Pisón,et al.  Characterization of subcortical structures during deep brain stimulation utilizing support vector machines , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  D. Vaillancourt,et al.  Effects of STN DBS on Rigidity in Parkinson's Disease , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.