Determination of bioceramic filler distribution and porosity of self-reinforced bioabsorbable composites using micro-computed tomography

A micro-computed tomography (μ-CT) image analysis was used in the micro-structural analysis of self-reinforced bioabsorbable osteoconductive composites. The composites studied were known to have a porous structure, but the total porosity of these composites had not been measured due to lack of interconnected pores. The micro-structure of the composites studied has previously been estimated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). This yielded a very rough estimation of the micro-structure based only on the surface estimate and thus more precise μ-CT image analyses of the total porosity and volumetric filler distribution were done. The present study was performed on five different composites manufactured with either single-screw or twin-screw extruder. All the samples had the same bioabsorbable matrix polymer, poly-l/dl-lactide 70/30. The filler material was either bioactive glass (BaG) 13–93 or β-tri calcium phosphate (β-TCP). The results illustrate the possibility of μ-CT image analysis for analyzing the micro-structures of the self-reinforced bioabsorbable osteoconductive composites. Especially the three-dimensional volumetric analysis of the filler particle distribution inside the composite showed results not received before.

[1]  Craig L Duvall,et al.  3D imaging of tissue integration with porous biomaterials. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[2]  M. Kakihana,et al.  Materials Research Society Symposium - Proceedings , 2000 .

[3]  P. Ma,et al.  Poly(alpha-hydroxyl acids)/hydroxyapatite porous composites for bone-tissue engineering. I. Preparation and morphology. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[4]  Dominique Bernard,et al.  Non-destructive quantitative 3D analysis for the optimisation of tissue scaffolds. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[5]  M. Kellomäki,et al.  Self-reinforced composites of bioabsorbable polymer and bioactive glass with different bioactive glass contents. Part II: In vitro degradation. , 2008, Acta biomaterialia.

[6]  L. Avérous,et al.  Determination of the microtexture of reinforced thermoplastics by image analysis , 1998 .

[7]  M. Kellomäki,et al.  Effect of filler content on mechanical and dynamic mechanical properties of particulate biphasic calcium phosphate--polylactide composites. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[8]  Larry L. Hench,et al.  Analysis of pore interconnectivity in bioactive glass foams using X-ray microtomography , 2004 .

[9]  P. Törmälä,et al.  Biodegradable self-reinforced composite materials; manufacturing structure and mechanical properties. , 1992, Clinical materials.

[10]  C. L. Y. Leon,et al.  New perspectives in mercury porosimetry , 1998 .

[11]  P. Törmälä,et al.  Self-Reinforced Bioactive Glass-Bioabsorbable Polymer Composites , 1998 .

[12]  M Kellomäki,et al.  Bioabsorbable scaffolds for guided bone regeneration and generation. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[13]  Niko Moritz,et al.  Analysis of multiple resolution μ-CT image sets for pore-size distribution estimation , 2009 .

[14]  Chiara Renghini,et al.  Micro-CT studies on 3-D bioactive glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone regeneration. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[15]  T. Niemelä.  Effect of β-tricalcium phosphate addition on the in vitro degradation of self-reinforced poly-l,d-lactide , 2005 .

[16]  Januar Gotama,et al.  X-ray ultramicroscopy: A new method for observation and measurement of filler dispersion in thermoplastic composites , 2008 .

[17]  Dietmar W Hutmacher,et al.  A comparison of micro CT with other techniques used in the characterization of scaffolds. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[18]  M. Kellomäki,et al.  In vitro and in vivo behavior of self-reinforced bioabsorbable polymer and self-reinforced bioabsorbable polymer/bioactive glass composites. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[19]  M. Kellomäki,et al.  In Vitro Degradation of Osteoconductive Poly-L/DL-Lactide / β-TCP Composites , 2003 .

[20]  P. Ma,et al.  Microtubular architecture of biodegradable polymer scaffolds. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[21]  J. Pirard,et al.  Characterization of porous texture of hyperporous materials by mercury porosimetry using densification equation , 2002 .

[22]  J. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Medical image processing and analysis , 2000 .

[23]  Leung Kwok-Sui,et al.  Novel approach for quantification of porosity for biomaterial implants using microcomputed tomography (microCT). , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[24]  Dietmar W Hutmacher,et al.  Assessment of bone ingrowth into porous biomaterials using MICRO-CT. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[25]  J. Donnet,et al.  Study of Microdispersion of Filler in Polymers by AFM Image Analysis , 2005, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[26]  Sergi Grau,et al.  3D reconstruction and quantification of porous structures , 2008, Comput. Graph..

[27]  M Kellomäki,et al.  Self-reinforced composites of bioabsorbable polymer and bioactive glass with different bioactive glass contents. Part I: Initial mechanical properties and bioactivity. , 2005, Acta biomaterialia.

[28]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Architecture and properties of anisotropic polymer composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[29]  Joan Serra,et al.  Image segmentation , 2003, Proceedings 2003 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.03CH37429).

[30]  Dietmar W Hutmacher,et al.  Analysis of 3D bone ingrowth into polymer scaffolds via micro-computed tomography imaging. , 2004, Biomaterials.