Recent research on geometry education: an ICME-13 survey team report

This survey on the theme of Geometry Education (including new technologies) focuses chiefly on the time span since 2008. Based on our review of the research literature published during this time span (in refereed journal articles, conference proceedings and edited books), we have jointly identified seven major threads of contributions that span from the early years of learning (pre-school and primary school) through to post-compulsory education and to the issue of mathematics teacher education for geometry. These threads are as follows: developments and trends in the use of theories; advances in the understanding of visuo spatial reasoning; the use and role of diagrams and gestures; advances in the understanding of the role of digital technologies; advances in the understanding of the teaching and learning of definitions; advances in the understanding of the teaching and learning of the proving process; and, moving beyond traditional Euclidean approaches. Within each theme, we identify relevant research and also offer commentary on future directions.

[1]  Nathalie Sinclair,et al.  Sounds and pictures: dynamism and dualism in Dynamic Geometry , 2009 .

[2]  Anne Birgitte Fyhn,et al.  A climbing class’ reinvention of angles , 2008 .

[3]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  Conceptualizing sound as a form of incarnate mathematical consciousness , 2012 .

[4]  C. Cornoldi,et al.  Intuitive geometry and visuospatial working memory in children showing symptoms of nonverbal learning disabilities , 2013, Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence.

[5]  Patricio G. Herbst,et al.  Students’ Conceptions of Congruency Through the Use of Dynamic Geometry Software , 2009, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[6]  Maria Alessandra Mariotti Geometrical proof: the mediation of a microworld , 2007 .

[7]  Bal Chandra Luitel Culture, worldview and transformative philosophy of mathematics education in Nepal: a cultural-philosophical inquiry , 2009 .

[8]  HwangGwo-Jen,et al.  A cognitive component analysis approach for developing game-based spatial learning tools , 2012 .

[9]  H. Jahnke,et al.  Understanding what a proof is: a classroom-based approach , 2013 .

[10]  Mi-Kyung Ju,et al.  A changing trajectory of proof learning in the geometry inquiry classroom , 2012 .

[11]  T. Fujita Learners' Level of Understanding of the Inclusion Relations of Quadrilaterals and prototype Phenomenon. , 2012 .

[12]  Margaret Kinzel,et al.  How do they know it is a parallelogram? Analysing geometric discourse at van Hiele Level 3 , 2014 .

[13]  I. M. Gómez-Chacón,et al.  SPACES FOR GEOMETRIC WORK: FIGURAL, INSTRUMENTAL, AND DISCURSIVE GENESES OF REASONING IN A TECHNOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT , 2015 .

[14]  Felix . Klein,et al.  Vergleichende Betrachtungen über neuere geometrische Forschungen , 1893 .

[15]  N. Presmeg Research on Visualization in Learning and Teaching Mathematics: Emergence from Psychology , 2006 .

[16]  Anna Baccaglini-Frank,et al.  Discernment of invariants in dynamic geometry environments , 2013 .

[17]  Julie Sarama,et al.  Mathematics Learned by Young Children in an Intervention Based on Learning Trajectories: A Large-Scale Cluster Randomized Trial , 2011 .

[19]  Amanda Hawkins,et al.  Explorations with Sketchpad in Topogeometry , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[20]  R. Hershkowitz Mathematics and Cognition: Psychological Aspects of Learning Geometry , 1990 .

[21]  Pierre Vérillon,et al.  Cognition and artifacts: A contribution to the study of though in relation to instrumented activity , 1995 .

[22]  M. Okazaki Prototype phenomena and common cognitive paths in the understanding of the inclusion relations between quadrilaterals in Japan and Scotland , 2007 .

[23]  Mathias Hattermann A First Application of New Theoretical Terms on Observed Dragging Modalities in 3D-Dynamic-Geometry-Environments , 2010 .

[24]  Colette Laborde,et al.  Dynamic and Tangible Representations in Mathematics Education , 2014 .

[25]  Humphrey Uyouyo Atebe,et al.  “As soon as the four sides are all equal, then the angles must be 90° each”. Children's misconceptions in geometry , 2008 .

[26]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Building Blocks for Developing Spatial Skills: Evidence From a Large, Representative U.S. Sample , 2015, Psychological science.

[27]  Maria Alice Gravina Drawing in movement and insights for the proof process , 2008 .

[28]  Dorit Patkin,et al.  The ability of second graders to identify solids in different positions and to justify their answer , 2013 .

[29]  M. Bussi Semiotic mediation: fragments from a classroom experiment on the coordination of spatial perspectives , 2007 .

[30]  Chronis Kynigos,et al.  Experiencing 3d Simulated Space Through Different Perspectives , 2012 .

[31]  Ken Cheng,et al.  25 years of research on the use of geometry in spatial reorientation: a current theoretical perspective , 2013, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[32]  Fou-Lai Lin,et al.  A model of reading comprehension of geometry proof , 2008 .

[33]  A. Sfard Thinking as Communicating: Human Development, the Growth of Discourses, and Mathematizing , 2008 .

[34]  Kate Highfield,et al.  Visuospatial Reasoning in Contexts with Digital Technology , 2015 .

[35]  P. Herbst,et al.  Proof, Proving, and Teacher-Student Interaction: Theories and Contexts , 2011 .

[36]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Navigation as a source of geometric knowledge: Young children’s use of length, angle, distance, and direction in a reorientation task , 2012, Cognition.

[38]  Anna Baccaglini-Frank,et al.  Geometry in early years: sowing seeds for a mathematical definition of squares and rectangles , 2014, ZDM.

[39]  P. Junius A case example of insect gymnastics: how is non-Euclidean geometry learned? , 2008 .

[40]  Liora Linchevski,et al.  To see or not to see: analyzing difficulties in geometry from the perspective of visual perception , 2010 .

[41]  Ferdinand Rivera,et al.  Toward a Visually-Oriented School Mathematics Curriculum , 2011 .

[42]  Ferdinando Arzarello,et al.  Semiosis as a multimodal process , 2006 .

[43]  E. Freitas,et al.  The haptic nature of gesture: Rethinking gesture with new multitouch digital technologies , 2014 .

[44]  P. M. Hiele Structure and Insight: A Theory of Mathematics Education , 1985 .

[45]  Anna Baccaglini-Frank Abduction in Generating Conjectures in dynamic Geometry through Maintaining Dragging , 2011 .

[46]  Asuman Duatepe-Paksu,et al.  Effects of Drama-Based Geometry Instruction on Student Achievement, Attitudes, and Thinking Levels , 2009 .

[47]  M. Villiers The Role and Function of a Hierarchical Classification of Quadrilaterals. , 1994 .

[48]  David H. Uttal,et al.  Exploring and Enhancing Spatial Thinking , 2013 .

[49]  Girts Burgmanis,et al.  Acquisition of spatial knowledge in different urban areas: evidence from a survey analysis of adolescents , 2014, Cognitive Processing.

[50]  Jie-Chi Yang,et al.  Effects of gender differences and spatial abilities within a digital pentominoes game , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[51]  Alfred Wassermann,et al.  SKETCHOMETRY AND JSXGRAPH { DYNAMIC GEOMETRY FOR MOBILE DEVICES , 2013 .

[52]  Allen Leung,et al.  Designing Mathematics Tasks: The Role of Tools , 2015 .

[53]  Kathleen Lynch-Davis,et al.  Exploring quadrilaterals to reveal teachers' use of definitions: Results and implications , 2014 .

[54]  Alain Kuzniak Understanding Geometric Work through Its Development and Its Transformations , 2014 .

[55]  Rachel Marks Key ideas in teaching mathematics: research-based guidance for ages 9–19 , 2014 .

[56]  Kay Owens,et al.  DIVERSIFYING OUR PERSPECTIVES ON MATHEMATICS ABOUT SPACE AND GEOMETRY: AN ECOCULTURAL APPROACH , 2014 .

[57]  Ángel Gutiérrez,et al.  AN ALTERNATIVE PARADIGM TO EVALUATE THE ACQUISITION OF THE VAN HIELE LEVELS , 2003 .

[58]  S. Bednarz,et al.  Dispositions Toward Teaching Spatial Thinking Through Geography: Conceptualization and an Exemplar Assessment , 2014 .

[59]  Nathalie Sinclair,et al.  Diagram, gesture, agency: theorizing embodiment in the mathematics classroom , 2012 .

[60]  Seiji Isotani,et al.  Interactive Geometry Goes Mobile with GeoTouch , 2014, 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[61]  Constantinos Christou,et al.  Types of reasoning in 3D geometry thinking and their relation with spatial ability , 2010 .

[62]  Vanessa Sena Tomaz,et al.  The role of visual representations for structuring classroom mathematical activity , 2012 .

[63]  Jana Trgalova,et al.  Quality assessment process for dynamic geometry resources in Intergeo project , 2011 .

[64]  Kay Owens,et al.  Visuospatial Reasoning: An Ecocultural Perspective for Space, Geometry and Measurement Education , 2014 .

[65]  Federica Olivero,et al.  Measuring in dynamic geometry environments as a tool for conjecturing and proving , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[66]  Anna Baccaglini-Frank,et al.  Generating Conjectures in Dynamic Geometry: The Maintaining Dragging Model , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[67]  S. Hennessy,et al.  School-based professional development in a developing context: lessons learnt from a case study in Zambia , 2015 .

[68]  Zalman Usiskin,et al.  The classification of quadrilaterals : a study of definition , 2008 .

[69]  H. Taylor,et al.  Think3d!: Training Spatial Thinking Fundamental to STEM Education , 2013 .

[70]  Taro Fujita,et al.  LEARNERS’ UNDERSTANDING OF THE DEFINITIONS AND HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION OF QUADRILATERALS: TOWARDS A THEORETICAL FRAMING , 2007 .

[71]  Paichi Pat Shein,et al.  Seeing With Two Eyes: A Teacher's Use of Gestures in Questioning and Revoicing to Engage English Language Learners in the Repair of Mathematical Errors , 2012 .

[72]  Heinz Steinbring,et al.  Young students’ subjective interpretations of mathematical diagrams: elements of the theoretical construct “frame-based interpreting competence” , 2014 .

[73]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A cognitive component analysis approach for developing game-based spatial learning tools , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[75]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  The Effect of Online Tasks for Algebra on Student Achievement in Grade 8 , 2014, Technol. Knowl. Learn..

[76]  Ryan Robidoux,et al.  Investigating the Mathematical Discourse of Young Learners Involved in Multi-Modal Mathematical Investigations: The Case of Haptic Technologies , 2013 .

[77]  B. Mainali,et al.  Using Dynamic Geometry Software GeoGebra in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Impressions of Mathematics Teachers in Nepal. , 2012 .

[78]  I. Leung Teaching and learning of inclusive and transitive properties among quadrilaterals by deductive reasoning with the aid of SmartBoard , 2008 .

[79]  Maria Fahlgren,et al.  A Model for Task Design with Focus on Exploration, Explanation, and Generalization in a Dynamic Geometry Environment , 2014, Technol. Knowl. Learn..

[80]  S. Rowlands A Pilot Study of a Cultural-Historical Approach to Teaching Geometry , 2008 .

[81]  Sue Greener What do we mean by “student-centred” learning? , 2015, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[82]  Dragging maintaining symmetry: can it generate the concept of inclusivity as well as a family of shapes? , 2015 .

[83]  Historical Artefacts, Semiotic Mediation and Teaching Proof , 2010 .

[84]  Sevil Arıcı,et al.  THE EFFECT OF ORIGAMI-BASED INSTRUCTION ON SPATIAL VISUALIZATION, GEOMETRY ACHIEVEMENT, AND GEOMETRIC REASONING , 2015 .

[85]  Michal Yerushalmy,et al.  “If You Can Turn a Rectangle into a Square, You Can Turn a Square into a Rectangle ...” Young Students Experience the Dragging Tool , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[86]  Nicolas Balacheff,et al.  cK¢, A Model to Reason on Learners' Conceptions. , 2013 .

[87]  Petra Margarete Menz,et al.  Unfolding of Diagramming and Gesturing between Mathematics Graduate Student and Supervisor during Research Meetings , 2015 .

[88]  Lorraine M. Males,et al.  The Mathematical Nature of Reasoning-and-Proving Opportunities in Geometry Textbooks , 2014 .

[89]  Nathalie Sinclair,et al.  Young children reasoning about symmetry in a dynamic geometry environment , 2015 .

[90]  Cristina Sabena On the semiotics of gestures , 2008 .

[91]  David R. Perry,et al.  Increasing Student Engagement, Self-Efficacy, and Meta-Cognitive Self-Regulation in the High School Geometry Classroom: Do iPads Help? , 2015 .

[92]  Ornella Robutti,et al.  Technology and the Role of Proof: The Case of Dynamic Geometry , 2012 .

[93]  Kate Mackrell Design decisions in interactive geometry software , 2011 .

[94]  Van Putten,et al.  Levels of thought in geometry of pre-service mathematics educators according to the van Hiele model , 2008 .

[95]  Bal Chandra Luitel MATHEMATICS AS AN IM/PURE KNOWLEDGE SYSTEM: SYMBIOSIS, (W)HOLISM AND SYNERGY IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION , 2013 .

[96]  Liping Ding,et al.  Teaching geometrical theorems in grade 8 using the “Shen Tou” method: a case study in Shanghai , 2015 .

[97]  Allen Leung Dragging in a Dynamic Geometry Environment Through the Lens of Variation , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[98]  Karen Hollebrands,et al.  The Role of a Dynamic Software Program for Geometry in the Strategies High School Mathematics Students Employ , 2007 .

[99]  Paul S. Wang,et al.  A Touch-Operation-Based Dynamic Geometry System: Design and Implementation , 2014, ICMS.

[100]  M. Villiers A Hexagon Result and its Generalization via Proof , 2007 .

[101]  Chris Rasmussen,et al.  Defining as a mathematical activity: A framework for characterizing progress from informal to more formal ways of reasoning , 2010 .

[102]  L. A. Tartre Spatial Orientation Skill and Mathematical Problem Solving. , 1990 .

[103]  M. Villiers Generalising a problem of Sylvester , 2012, The Mathematical Gazette.

[104]  Shannon E. McCarthy,et al.  Kindergarten children's sensitivity to geometry in maps. , 2011, Developmental science.

[105]  Mijung Kim,et al.  CHILDREN’S GESTURES AND THE EMBODIED KNOWLEDGE OF GEOMETRY , 2011 .

[106]  F. Arzarello,et al.  A cognitive analysis of dragging practises in Cabri environments , 2002 .

[107]  Signe E. Kastberg,et al.  Making sense of shape: An analysis of children's written responses , 2009 .

[108]  Florian Schimpf,et al.  Reducing the graphical user interface of a dynamic geometry system , 2011 .

[109]  Harpreet Kaur Two aspects of young children’s thinking about different types of dynamic triangles: prototypicality and inclusion , 2015 .

[110]  Catherine D. Bruce,et al.  New opportunities in geometry education at the primary school , 2015 .

[111]  P. Tsamir,et al.  Preschool Geometry: Theory, Research, and Practical Perpectives , 2011 .

[112]  D. Pimm,et al.  Symbols and meanings in school mathematics , 1995 .

[113]  Thomas Lowrie,et al.  Perspectives on geometry and measurement in the national curriculum , 2012 .

[114]  D. Romano GAINING INSIGHT OF HOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA CONCEPTUALIZE GEOMETRIC SHAPE OF PARALLELOGRAM , 2013 .

[115]  Ference Marton,et al.  The space of learning , 2004 .

[116]  Claire Margolinas,et al.  cK¢ Modèle de connaissances pour le calcul de situations didactiques , 2003 .

[117]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Spatial Training Improves Children's Mathematics Ability , 2014 .

[118]  Daniel Voyer,et al.  The relation between childhood spatial activities and spatial abilities in adulthood , 2012 .

[119]  A. Miyake,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking , 2005 .

[120]  Daina Taimina,et al.  Concrete models and dynamic instruments as early technology tools in classrooms at the dawn of ICMI: from Felix Klein to present applications in mathematics classrooms in different parts of the world , 2010 .

[121]  Ulrich Kortenkamp,et al.  USER INTERFACE DESIGN FOR DYNAMIC GEOMETRY SOFTWARE , 2010 .

[122]  Alfred Wassermann,et al.  JSXGraph - Dynamic Mathematics with JavaScript. , 2010 .

[123]  Fernando Zalamea,et al.  Synthetic Philosophy of Contemporary Mathematics , 2012 .

[124]  K.P.E. Gravemeijer,et al.  Developing shift problems to foster geometrical proof and understanding , 2013 .

[125]  P. Herbst,et al.  The interplay among gestures, discourse, and diagrams in students’ geometrical reasoning , 2013 .

[126]  Anna Baccaglini-Frank,et al.  Reasoning by Contradiction in Dynamic Geometry (publication upon invitation from the PME 35 proceedings) , 2012 .

[127]  A. Powell,et al.  Understanding and Overcoming “Disadvantage” in Learning Mathematics , 2012 .

[128]  A. Volta Moving from dragging to touchscreen: geometrical learning with geometric dynamic software , 2014 .

[129]  Juanita V. Copley,et al.  The Development of Spatial Skills Through Interventions Involving Block Building Activities , 2008 .

[130]  Ryan C. Smith,et al.  The Nature of Arguments Provided by College Geometry Students with Access to Technology while Solving Problems. , 2010 .

[131]  D. Uttal,et al.  The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[132]  Yao-Ting Sung,et al.  Using mobile devices to enhance the interactive learning for spatial geometry , 2016, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[133]  R. Leikin,et al.  Teachers modify geometry problems: from proof to investigation , 2013 .

[134]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  Longitudinal Study of Children's Reasoning About Space and Geometry , 2012 .

[135]  Óscar Chávez,et al.  Opportunities to engage with proof: the nature of proof tasks in two geometry textbooks and its influence on enacted lessons , 2014 .

[136]  Adnan Baki,et al.  Characterizing student mathematics teachers’ levels of understanding in spherical geometry , 2010 .

[137]  REVISITING VAN HIELE , 2012 .

[138]  Panagiotis Spyrou,et al.  THE NEED FOR PROOF IN GEOMETRY : A THEORETICAL INVESTIGATION THROUGH HUSSERL ’ S PHENOMENOLOGY , 2013 .

[139]  James T. Smith Definitions and Nondefinability in Geometry , 2010, Am. Math. Mon..

[140]  L. Healy,et al.  The role of gestures in the mathematical practices of those who do not see with their eyes , 2011 .

[141]  Philippe R. Richard,et al.  Didactic and theoretical-based perspectives in the experimental development of an intelligent tutorial system for the learning of geometry , 2011 .

[142]  Claudi Alsina,et al.  Math Made Visual: Creating Images for Understanding Mathematics , 2006 .

[143]  E. Freitas,et al.  Virtual encounters: the murky and furtive world of mathematical inventiveness , 2012, ZDM.

[144]  Nathalie Sinclair,et al.  “Area Without Numbers”: Using Touchscreen Dynamic Geometry to Reason About Shape , 2015 .

[145]  E. Fischbein,et al.  Defining in Classroom Activities , 1997 .

[146]  Gerrit H. Stols,et al.  Why don't all maths teachers use dynamic geometry software in their classrooms? , 2011 .

[147]  Maria Alessandra Mariotti,et al.  Transforming Images in a DGS: The Semiotic Potential of the Dragging Tool for Introducing the Notion of Conditional Statement , 2014 .

[148]  Cesare Cornoldi,et al.  Visuospatial working memory in intuitive geometry, and in academic achievement in geometry , 2013 .

[149]  Allen Leung,et al.  An epistemic model of task design in dynamic geometry environment , 2011 .

[150]  M. Mariotti,et al.  Semiotic Mediation in the Mathematics Classroom: Artefacts and Signs after a Vygotskian Perspective , 2008 .

[151]  Quadrilaterals and tetrahedra , 2009 .

[152]  Kate Mackrell,et al.  Designing Digital Technologies and Learning Activities for Different Geometries , 2009 .

[153]  W. Whiteley,et al.  Designing spatial visual tasks for research: the case of the filling task , 2011 .

[154]  左 台益 專書論文導讀-科技工具與數學證明教學<Experimental Approach to Theoretical Thinking: Artefacts and Proofs>論文評述 , 2015 .

[155]  H. Freudenthal Mathematics as an Educational Task , 1972 .

[156]  The nature of geometry instruction and observed learning-outcomes opportunities in Nigerian and South African high schools , 2011 .

[157]  Michela Maschietto,et al.  Working with artefacts: gestures, drawings and speech in the construction of the mathematical meaning of the visual pyramid , 2009 .

[158]  E. Fischbein The theory of figural concepts , 1993 .

[159]  Masakazu Okazaki Identifying situations for fifth graders to construct definitions as conditions for determining geometric figures , 2013 .

[160]  R. Ambrose,et al.  Children's Evolving Understanding of Polyhedra in the Classroom , 2009 .

[161]  Chun-Yi Lee,et al.  The Impacts of Virtual Manipulatives and Prior Knowledge on Geometry Learning Performance in Junior High School , 2014 .

[162]  Marta Venturini,et al.  How teachers think about the role of digital technologies in student assessment in mathematics , 2015 .

[163]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  Conceptual Change from the Framework Theory Side of the Fence , 2014 .

[164]  Brent Davis,et al.  Spatial Reasoning in the Early Years: Principles, Assertions, and Speculations , 2015 .

[165]  K. Tessema The Teacher Education Reform Process in Ethiopia: Some consequences on educators and its implications , 2007 .

[166]  Susan Goldin Hearing gesture : how our hands help us think , 2003 .

[167]  Chronis Kynigos,et al.  Normalising geometrical figures: dynamic manipulation and construction of meanings for ratio and proportion , 2009 .

[168]  Kevin Lai,et al.  How groups cooperate in a networked geometry learning environment , 2014 .

[169]  Marie-Jeanne Perrin-Glorian,et al.  Comment peut-on penser la continuité de l'enseignement de la géométrie de 6 à 15 ans ? Le jeu sur les supports et les instruments. , 2013 .

[170]  Candia Morgan,et al.  Communicating Experience of 3D Space: Mathematical and Everyday Discourse , 2012 .

[171]  Hussein Abdelfatah A story-based dynamic geometry approach to improve attitudes toward geometry and geometric proof , 2011 .

[172]  R. Pinxten,et al.  Politics in an Indian canyon? Some thoughts on the implications of ethnomathematics , 2011 .

[173]  M. Villiers Using Dynamic Geometry to Expand Mathematics Teachers' Understanding of Proof. , 2004 .

[174]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Paper Interfaces for Learning Geometry , 2012, EC-TEL.

[175]  Keith Jones,et al.  Flow-chart proofs with open problems as scaffolds for learning about geometrical proofs , 2015 .

[176]  Students’ geometrical perception on a task-based dynamic geometry platform , 2013 .

[177]  M. Stieff,et al.  Six Myths About Spatial Thinking , 2012 .

[178]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  Chalk: Materials and Concepts in Mathematics Research , 2011 .

[179]  B. Micale,et al.  Analogy and dynamic geometry system used to introduce three-dimensional geometry , 2012 .

[180]  K. Owens,et al.  The Importance of an Ecocultural Perspective for Indigenous and Transcultural Education , 2015 .

[181]  Jennifer S. Thom,et al.  The act and artifact of drawing(s): observing geometric thinking with, in, and through children’s drawings , 2015 .

[182]  Melissa Ingraham Incorporating iPad Technology into the Classroom: A Geometry Project , 2013 .

[183]  J. Moss,et al.  The more it changes, the more it becomes the same: The development of the routine of shape identification in dynamic geometry environment☆ , 2012 .

[184]  Nathalie Sinclair,et al.  Using Dynamic Geometry Software to Explore Eigenvectors: The Emergence of Dynamic-Synthetic-Geometric Thinking , 2013, Technology, Knowledge and Learning.

[185]  E. Freitas Book Review: Teacher identity: Harsh lessons learned from the micro-management of teachers and teacher education: A review of Tony Brown and Olwen McNamara’s Becoming a mathematics teacher: Identity and identifications (2011) , 2012, Educational Studies in Mathematics.

[186]  Keith Jones,et al.  Establishing a professional development network around dynamic mathematics software in England , 2010 .

[187]  Stephen Hegedus,et al.  Accommodating the Instrumental Genesis Framework within Dynamic Technology Environments , 2010 .

[188]  Ilhan Karatas,et al.  Students discovering spherical geometry using dynamic geometry software , 2009 .

[189]  Raymond Duval,et al.  Les conditions cognitives de l’apprentissage de la géométrie: développement de la visualisation, différenciation des raisonnements et coordination de leurs fonctionnements , 2005 .

[190]  D. Grenier,et al.  EXPERIMENTATION AND PROOF IN A SOLID GEOMETRY TEACHING SITUATION , 2010 .

[191]  Ulrich Kortenkamp,et al.  The Cinderella.2 Manual: Working with The Interactive Geometry Software , 2012 .

[192]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Where mathematics comes from : how the embodied mind brings mathematics into being , 2002 .

[193]  Alain Kuzniak,et al.  Understanding the Nature of the Geometric Work Through Its Development and Its Transformations , 2015 .

[194]  A. Leung Variation and mathematics pedagogy , 2012 .