Recent research on geometry education: an ICME-13 survey team report
暂无分享,去创建一个
Keith Jones | Ulrich Kortenkamp | Nathalie Sinclair | Allen Leung | Kay Owens | Ulrich Kortenkamp | Keith Jones | A. Leung | Nathalie Sinclair | Maria G. Bartolini Bussi | M. Villiers | K. Owens | Michael Villiers | M. G. Bartolini Bussi | N. Sinclair
[1] Nathalie Sinclair,et al. Sounds and pictures: dynamism and dualism in Dynamic Geometry , 2009 .
[2] Anne Birgitte Fyhn,et al. A climbing class’ reinvention of angles , 2008 .
[3] Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al. Conceptualizing sound as a form of incarnate mathematical consciousness , 2012 .
[4] C. Cornoldi,et al. Intuitive geometry and visuospatial working memory in children showing symptoms of nonverbal learning disabilities , 2013, Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence.
[5] Patricio G. Herbst,et al. Students’ Conceptions of Congruency Through the Use of Dynamic Geometry Software , 2009, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..
[6] Maria Alessandra Mariotti. Geometrical proof: the mediation of a microworld , 2007 .
[7] Bal Chandra Luitel. Culture, worldview and transformative philosophy of mathematics education in Nepal: a cultural-philosophical inquiry , 2009 .
[8] HwangGwo-Jen,et al. A cognitive component analysis approach for developing game-based spatial learning tools , 2012 .
[9] H. Jahnke,et al. Understanding what a proof is: a classroom-based approach , 2013 .
[10] Mi-Kyung Ju,et al. A changing trajectory of proof learning in the geometry inquiry classroom , 2012 .
[11] T. Fujita. Learners' Level of Understanding of the Inclusion Relations of Quadrilaterals and prototype Phenomenon. , 2012 .
[12] Margaret Kinzel,et al. How do they know it is a parallelogram? Analysing geometric discourse at van Hiele Level 3 , 2014 .
[13] I. M. Gómez-Chacón,et al. SPACES FOR GEOMETRIC WORK: FIGURAL, INSTRUMENTAL, AND DISCURSIVE GENESES OF REASONING IN A TECHNOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT , 2015 .
[14] Felix . Klein,et al. Vergleichende Betrachtungen über neuere geometrische Forschungen , 1893 .
[15] N. Presmeg. Research on Visualization in Learning and Teaching Mathematics: Emergence from Psychology , 2006 .
[16] Anna Baccaglini-Frank,et al. Discernment of invariants in dynamic geometry environments , 2013 .
[17] Julie Sarama,et al. Mathematics Learned by Young Children in an Intervention Based on Learning Trajectories: A Large-Scale Cluster Randomized Trial , 2011 .
[19] Amanda Hawkins,et al. Explorations with Sketchpad in Topogeometry , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..
[20] R. Hershkowitz. Mathematics and Cognition: Psychological Aspects of Learning Geometry , 1990 .
[21] Pierre Vérillon,et al. Cognition and artifacts: A contribution to the study of though in relation to instrumented activity , 1995 .
[22] M. Okazaki. Prototype phenomena and common cognitive paths in the understanding of the inclusion relations between quadrilaterals in Japan and Scotland , 2007 .
[23] Mathias Hattermann. A First Application of New Theoretical Terms on Observed Dragging Modalities in 3D-Dynamic-Geometry-Environments , 2010 .
[24] Colette Laborde,et al. Dynamic and Tangible Representations in Mathematics Education , 2014 .
[25] Humphrey Uyouyo Atebe,et al. “As soon as the four sides are all equal, then the angles must be 90° each”. Children's misconceptions in geometry , 2008 .
[26] N. Newcombe,et al. Building Blocks for Developing Spatial Skills: Evidence From a Large, Representative U.S. Sample , 2015, Psychological science.
[27] Maria Alice Gravina. Drawing in movement and insights for the proof process , 2008 .
[28] Dorit Patkin,et al. The ability of second graders to identify solids in different positions and to justify their answer , 2013 .
[29] M. Bussi. Semiotic mediation: fragments from a classroom experiment on the coordination of spatial perspectives , 2007 .
[30] Chronis Kynigos,et al. Experiencing 3d Simulated Space Through Different Perspectives , 2012 .
[31] Ken Cheng,et al. 25 years of research on the use of geometry in spatial reorientation: a current theoretical perspective , 2013, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
[32] Fou-Lai Lin,et al. A model of reading comprehension of geometry proof , 2008 .
[33] A. Sfard. Thinking as Communicating: Human Development, the Growth of Discourses, and Mathematizing , 2008 .
[34] Kate Highfield,et al. Visuospatial Reasoning in Contexts with Digital Technology , 2015 .
[35] P. Herbst,et al. Proof, Proving, and Teacher-Student Interaction: Theories and Contexts , 2011 .
[36] Sang Ah Lee,et al. Navigation as a source of geometric knowledge: Young children’s use of length, angle, distance, and direction in a reorientation task , 2012, Cognition.
[38] Anna Baccaglini-Frank,et al. Geometry in early years: sowing seeds for a mathematical definition of squares and rectangles , 2014, ZDM.
[39] P. Junius. A case example of insect gymnastics: how is non-Euclidean geometry learned? , 2008 .
[40] Liora Linchevski,et al. To see or not to see: analyzing difficulties in geometry from the perspective of visual perception , 2010 .
[41] Ferdinand Rivera,et al. Toward a Visually-Oriented School Mathematics Curriculum , 2011 .
[42] Ferdinando Arzarello,et al. Semiosis as a multimodal process , 2006 .
[43] E. Freitas,et al. The haptic nature of gesture: Rethinking gesture with new multitouch digital technologies , 2014 .
[44] P. M. Hiele. Structure and Insight: A Theory of Mathematics Education , 1985 .
[45] Anna Baccaglini-Frank. Abduction in Generating Conjectures in dynamic Geometry through Maintaining Dragging , 2011 .
[46] Asuman Duatepe-Paksu,et al. Effects of Drama-Based Geometry Instruction on Student Achievement, Attitudes, and Thinking Levels , 2009 .
[47] M. Villiers. The Role and Function of a Hierarchical Classification of Quadrilaterals. , 1994 .
[48] David H. Uttal,et al. Exploring and Enhancing Spatial Thinking , 2013 .
[49] Girts Burgmanis,et al. Acquisition of spatial knowledge in different urban areas: evidence from a survey analysis of adolescents , 2014, Cognitive Processing.
[50] Jie-Chi Yang,et al. Effects of gender differences and spatial abilities within a digital pentominoes game , 2010, Comput. Educ..
[51] Alfred Wassermann,et al. SKETCHOMETRY AND JSXGRAPH { DYNAMIC GEOMETRY FOR MOBILE DEVICES , 2013 .
[52] Allen Leung,et al. Designing Mathematics Tasks: The Role of Tools , 2015 .
[53] Kathleen Lynch-Davis,et al. Exploring quadrilaterals to reveal teachers' use of definitions: Results and implications , 2014 .
[54] Alain Kuzniak. Understanding Geometric Work through Its Development and Its Transformations , 2014 .
[55] Rachel Marks. Key ideas in teaching mathematics: research-based guidance for ages 9–19 , 2014 .
[56] Kay Owens,et al. DIVERSIFYING OUR PERSPECTIVES ON MATHEMATICS ABOUT SPACE AND GEOMETRY: AN ECOCULTURAL APPROACH , 2014 .
[57] Ángel Gutiérrez,et al. AN ALTERNATIVE PARADIGM TO EVALUATE THE ACQUISITION OF THE VAN HIELE LEVELS , 2003 .
[58] S. Bednarz,et al. Dispositions Toward Teaching Spatial Thinking Through Geography: Conceptualization and an Exemplar Assessment , 2014 .
[59] Nathalie Sinclair,et al. Diagram, gesture, agency: theorizing embodiment in the mathematics classroom , 2012 .
[60] Seiji Isotani,et al. Interactive Geometry Goes Mobile with GeoTouch , 2014, 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.
[61] Constantinos Christou,et al. Types of reasoning in 3D geometry thinking and their relation with spatial ability , 2010 .
[62] Vanessa Sena Tomaz,et al. The role of visual representations for structuring classroom mathematical activity , 2012 .
[63] Jana Trgalova,et al. Quality assessment process for dynamic geometry resources in Intergeo project , 2011 .
[64] Kay Owens,et al. Visuospatial Reasoning: An Ecocultural Perspective for Space, Geometry and Measurement Education , 2014 .
[65] Federica Olivero,et al. Measuring in dynamic geometry environments as a tool for conjecturing and proving , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..
[66] Anna Baccaglini-Frank,et al. Generating Conjectures in Dynamic Geometry: The Maintaining Dragging Model , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..
[67] S. Hennessy,et al. School-based professional development in a developing context: lessons learnt from a case study in Zambia , 2015 .
[68] Zalman Usiskin,et al. The classification of quadrilaterals : a study of definition , 2008 .
[69] H. Taylor,et al. Think3d!: Training Spatial Thinking Fundamental to STEM Education , 2013 .
[70] Taro Fujita,et al. LEARNERS’ UNDERSTANDING OF THE DEFINITIONS AND HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION OF QUADRILATERALS: TOWARDS A THEORETICAL FRAMING , 2007 .
[71] Paichi Pat Shein,et al. Seeing With Two Eyes: A Teacher's Use of Gestures in Questioning and Revoicing to Engage English Language Learners in the Repair of Mathematical Errors , 2012 .
[72] Heinz Steinbring,et al. Young students’ subjective interpretations of mathematical diagrams: elements of the theoretical construct “frame-based interpreting competence” , 2014 .
[73] Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al. A cognitive component analysis approach for developing game-based spatial learning tools , 2012, Comput. Educ..
[75] Paul A. Kirschner,et al. The Effect of Online Tasks for Algebra on Student Achievement in Grade 8 , 2014, Technol. Knowl. Learn..
[76] Ryan Robidoux,et al. Investigating the Mathematical Discourse of Young Learners Involved in Multi-Modal Mathematical Investigations: The Case of Haptic Technologies , 2013 .
[77] B. Mainali,et al. Using Dynamic Geometry Software GeoGebra in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Impressions of Mathematics Teachers in Nepal. , 2012 .
[78] I. Leung. Teaching and learning of inclusive and transitive properties among quadrilaterals by deductive reasoning with the aid of SmartBoard , 2008 .
[79] Maria Fahlgren,et al. A Model for Task Design with Focus on Exploration, Explanation, and Generalization in a Dynamic Geometry Environment , 2014, Technol. Knowl. Learn..
[80] S. Rowlands. A Pilot Study of a Cultural-Historical Approach to Teaching Geometry , 2008 .
[81] Sue Greener. What do we mean by “student-centred” learning? , 2015, Interact. Learn. Environ..
[82] Dragging maintaining symmetry: can it generate the concept of inclusivity as well as a family of shapes? , 2015 .
[83] Historical Artefacts, Semiotic Mediation and Teaching Proof , 2010 .
[84] Sevil Arıcı,et al. THE EFFECT OF ORIGAMI-BASED INSTRUCTION ON SPATIAL VISUALIZATION, GEOMETRY ACHIEVEMENT, AND GEOMETRIC REASONING , 2015 .
[85] Michal Yerushalmy,et al. “If You Can Turn a Rectangle into a Square, You Can Turn a Square into a Rectangle ...” Young Students Experience the Dragging Tool , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..
[86] Nicolas Balacheff,et al. cK¢, A Model to Reason on Learners' Conceptions. , 2013 .
[87] Petra Margarete Menz,et al. Unfolding of Diagramming and Gesturing between Mathematics Graduate Student and Supervisor during Research Meetings , 2015 .
[88] Lorraine M. Males,et al. The Mathematical Nature of Reasoning-and-Proving Opportunities in Geometry Textbooks , 2014 .
[89] Nathalie Sinclair,et al. Young children reasoning about symmetry in a dynamic geometry environment , 2015 .
[90] Cristina Sabena. On the semiotics of gestures , 2008 .
[91] David R. Perry,et al. Increasing Student Engagement, Self-Efficacy, and Meta-Cognitive Self-Regulation in the High School Geometry Classroom: Do iPads Help? , 2015 .
[92] Ornella Robutti,et al. Technology and the Role of Proof: The Case of Dynamic Geometry , 2012 .
[93] Kate Mackrell. Design decisions in interactive geometry software , 2011 .
[94] Van Putten,et al. Levels of thought in geometry of pre-service mathematics educators according to the van Hiele model , 2008 .
[95] Bal Chandra Luitel. MATHEMATICS AS AN IM/PURE KNOWLEDGE SYSTEM: SYMBIOSIS, (W)HOLISM AND SYNERGY IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION , 2013 .
[96] Liping Ding,et al. Teaching geometrical theorems in grade 8 using the “Shen Tou” method: a case study in Shanghai , 2015 .
[97] Allen Leung. Dragging in a Dynamic Geometry Environment Through the Lens of Variation , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..
[98] Karen Hollebrands,et al. The Role of a Dynamic Software Program for Geometry in the Strategies High School Mathematics Students Employ , 2007 .
[99] Paul S. Wang,et al. A Touch-Operation-Based Dynamic Geometry System: Design and Implementation , 2014, ICMS.
[100] M. Villiers. A Hexagon Result and its Generalization via Proof , 2007 .
[101] Chris Rasmussen,et al. Defining as a mathematical activity: A framework for characterizing progress from informal to more formal ways of reasoning , 2010 .
[102] L. A. Tartre. Spatial Orientation Skill and Mathematical Problem Solving. , 1990 .
[103] M. Villiers. Generalising a problem of Sylvester , 2012, The Mathematical Gazette.
[104] Shannon E. McCarthy,et al. Kindergarten children's sensitivity to geometry in maps. , 2011, Developmental science.
[105] Mijung Kim,et al. CHILDREN’S GESTURES AND THE EMBODIED KNOWLEDGE OF GEOMETRY , 2011 .
[106] F. Arzarello,et al. A cognitive analysis of dragging practises in Cabri environments , 2002 .
[107] Signe E. Kastberg,et al. Making sense of shape: An analysis of children's written responses , 2009 .
[108] Florian Schimpf,et al. Reducing the graphical user interface of a dynamic geometry system , 2011 .
[109] Harpreet Kaur. Two aspects of young children’s thinking about different types of dynamic triangles: prototypicality and inclusion , 2015 .
[110] Catherine D. Bruce,et al. New opportunities in geometry education at the primary school , 2015 .
[111] P. Tsamir,et al. Preschool Geometry: Theory, Research, and Practical Perpectives , 2011 .
[112] D. Pimm,et al. Symbols and meanings in school mathematics , 1995 .
[113] Thomas Lowrie,et al. Perspectives on geometry and measurement in the national curriculum , 2012 .
[114] D. Romano. GAINING INSIGHT OF HOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA CONCEPTUALIZE GEOMETRIC SHAPE OF PARALLELOGRAM , 2013 .
[115] Ference Marton,et al. The space of learning , 2004 .
[116] Claire Margolinas,et al. cK¢ Modèle de connaissances pour le calcul de situations didactiques , 2003 .
[117] Kelly S. Mix,et al. Spatial Training Improves Children's Mathematics Ability , 2014 .
[118] Daniel Voyer,et al. The relation between childhood spatial activities and spatial abilities in adulthood , 2012 .
[119] A. Miyake,et al. The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking , 2005 .
[120] Daina Taimina,et al. Concrete models and dynamic instruments as early technology tools in classrooms at the dawn of ICMI: from Felix Klein to present applications in mathematics classrooms in different parts of the world , 2010 .
[121] Ulrich Kortenkamp,et al. USER INTERFACE DESIGN FOR DYNAMIC GEOMETRY SOFTWARE , 2010 .
[122] Alfred Wassermann,et al. JSXGraph - Dynamic Mathematics with JavaScript. , 2010 .
[123] Fernando Zalamea,et al. Synthetic Philosophy of Contemporary Mathematics , 2012 .
[124] K.P.E. Gravemeijer,et al. Developing shift problems to foster geometrical proof and understanding , 2013 .
[125] P. Herbst,et al. The interplay among gestures, discourse, and diagrams in students’ geometrical reasoning , 2013 .
[126] Anna Baccaglini-Frank,et al. Reasoning by Contradiction in Dynamic Geometry (publication upon invitation from the PME 35 proceedings) , 2012 .
[127] A. Powell,et al. Understanding and Overcoming “Disadvantage” in Learning Mathematics , 2012 .
[128] A. Volta. Moving from dragging to touchscreen: geometrical learning with geometric dynamic software , 2014 .
[129] Juanita V. Copley,et al. The Development of Spatial Skills Through Interventions Involving Block Building Activities , 2008 .
[130] Ryan C. Smith,et al. The Nature of Arguments Provided by College Geometry Students with Access to Technology while Solving Problems. , 2010 .
[131] D. Uttal,et al. The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.
[132] Yao-Ting Sung,et al. Using mobile devices to enhance the interactive learning for spatial geometry , 2016, Interact. Learn. Environ..
[133] R. Leikin,et al. Teachers modify geometry problems: from proof to investigation , 2013 .
[134] Richard Lehrer,et al. Longitudinal Study of Children's Reasoning About Space and Geometry , 2012 .
[135] Óscar Chávez,et al. Opportunities to engage with proof: the nature of proof tasks in two geometry textbooks and its influence on enacted lessons , 2014 .
[136] Adnan Baki,et al. Characterizing student mathematics teachers’ levels of understanding in spherical geometry , 2010 .
[137] REVISITING VAN HIELE , 2012 .
[138] Panagiotis Spyrou,et al. THE NEED FOR PROOF IN GEOMETRY : A THEORETICAL INVESTIGATION THROUGH HUSSERL ’ S PHENOMENOLOGY , 2013 .
[139] James T. Smith. Definitions and Nondefinability in Geometry , 2010, Am. Math. Mon..
[140] L. Healy,et al. The role of gestures in the mathematical practices of those who do not see with their eyes , 2011 .
[141] Philippe R. Richard,et al. Didactic and theoretical-based perspectives in the experimental development of an intelligent tutorial system for the learning of geometry , 2011 .
[142] Claudi Alsina,et al. Math Made Visual: Creating Images for Understanding Mathematics , 2006 .
[143] E. Freitas,et al. Virtual encounters: the murky and furtive world of mathematical inventiveness , 2012, ZDM.
[144] Nathalie Sinclair,et al. “Area Without Numbers”: Using Touchscreen Dynamic Geometry to Reason About Shape , 2015 .
[145] E. Fischbein,et al. Defining in Classroom Activities , 1997 .
[146] Gerrit H. Stols,et al. Why don't all maths teachers use dynamic geometry software in their classrooms? , 2011 .
[147] Maria Alessandra Mariotti,et al. Transforming Images in a DGS: The Semiotic Potential of the Dragging Tool for Introducing the Notion of Conditional Statement , 2014 .
[148] Cesare Cornoldi,et al. Visuospatial working memory in intuitive geometry, and in academic achievement in geometry , 2013 .
[149] Allen Leung,et al. An epistemic model of task design in dynamic geometry environment , 2011 .
[150] M. Mariotti,et al. Semiotic Mediation in the Mathematics Classroom: Artefacts and Signs after a Vygotskian Perspective , 2008 .
[151] Quadrilaterals and tetrahedra , 2009 .
[152] Kate Mackrell,et al. Designing Digital Technologies and Learning Activities for Different Geometries , 2009 .
[153] W. Whiteley,et al. Designing spatial visual tasks for research: the case of the filling task , 2011 .
[154] 左 台益. 專書論文導讀-科技工具與數學證明教學<Experimental Approach to Theoretical Thinking: Artefacts and Proofs>論文評述 , 2015 .
[155] H. Freudenthal. Mathematics as an Educational Task , 1972 .
[156] The nature of geometry instruction and observed learning-outcomes opportunities in Nigerian and South African high schools , 2011 .
[157] Michela Maschietto,et al. Working with artefacts: gestures, drawings and speech in the construction of the mathematical meaning of the visual pyramid , 2009 .
[158] E. Fischbein. The theory of figural concepts , 1993 .
[159] Masakazu Okazaki. Identifying situations for fifth graders to construct definitions as conditions for determining geometric figures , 2013 .
[160] R. Ambrose,et al. Children's Evolving Understanding of Polyhedra in the Classroom , 2009 .
[161] Chun-Yi Lee,et al. The Impacts of Virtual Manipulatives and Prior Knowledge on Geometry Learning Performance in Junior High School , 2014 .
[162] Marta Venturini,et al. How teachers think about the role of digital technologies in student assessment in mathematics , 2015 .
[163] Stella Vosniadou,et al. Conceptual Change from the Framework Theory Side of the Fence , 2014 .
[164] Brent Davis,et al. Spatial Reasoning in the Early Years: Principles, Assertions, and Speculations , 2015 .
[165] K. Tessema. The Teacher Education Reform Process in Ethiopia: Some consequences on educators and its implications , 2007 .
[166] Susan Goldin. Hearing gesture : how our hands help us think , 2003 .
[167] Chronis Kynigos,et al. Normalising geometrical figures: dynamic manipulation and construction of meanings for ratio and proportion , 2009 .
[168] Kevin Lai,et al. How groups cooperate in a networked geometry learning environment , 2014 .
[169] Marie-Jeanne Perrin-Glorian,et al. Comment peut-on penser la continuité de l'enseignement de la géométrie de 6 à 15 ans ? Le jeu sur les supports et les instruments. , 2013 .
[170] Candia Morgan,et al. Communicating Experience of 3D Space: Mathematical and Everyday Discourse , 2012 .
[171] Hussein Abdelfatah. A story-based dynamic geometry approach to improve attitudes toward geometry and geometric proof , 2011 .
[172] R. Pinxten,et al. Politics in an Indian canyon? Some thoughts on the implications of ethnomathematics , 2011 .
[173] M. Villiers. Using Dynamic Geometry to Expand Mathematics Teachers' Understanding of Proof. , 2004 .
[174] Pierre Dillenbourg,et al. Paper Interfaces for Learning Geometry , 2012, EC-TEL.
[175] Keith Jones,et al. Flow-chart proofs with open problems as scaffolds for learning about geometrical proofs , 2015 .
[176] Students’ geometrical perception on a task-based dynamic geometry platform , 2013 .
[177] M. Stieff,et al. Six Myths About Spatial Thinking , 2012 .
[178] D. MacKenzie,et al. Chalk: Materials and Concepts in Mathematics Research , 2011 .
[179] B. Micale,et al. Analogy and dynamic geometry system used to introduce three-dimensional geometry , 2012 .
[180] K. Owens,et al. The Importance of an Ecocultural Perspective for Indigenous and Transcultural Education , 2015 .
[181] Jennifer S. Thom,et al. The act and artifact of drawing(s): observing geometric thinking with, in, and through children’s drawings , 2015 .
[182] Melissa Ingraham. Incorporating iPad Technology into the Classroom: A Geometry Project , 2013 .
[183] J. Moss,et al. The more it changes, the more it becomes the same: The development of the routine of shape identification in dynamic geometry environment☆ , 2012 .
[184] Nathalie Sinclair,et al. Using Dynamic Geometry Software to Explore Eigenvectors: The Emergence of Dynamic-Synthetic-Geometric Thinking , 2013, Technology, Knowledge and Learning.
[185] E. Freitas. Book Review: Teacher identity: Harsh lessons learned from the micro-management of teachers and teacher education: A review of Tony Brown and Olwen McNamara’s Becoming a mathematics teacher: Identity and identifications (2011) , 2012, Educational Studies in Mathematics.
[186] Keith Jones,et al. Establishing a professional development network around dynamic mathematics software in England , 2010 .
[187] Stephen Hegedus,et al. Accommodating the Instrumental Genesis Framework within Dynamic Technology Environments , 2010 .
[188] Ilhan Karatas,et al. Students discovering spherical geometry using dynamic geometry software , 2009 .
[189] Raymond Duval,et al. Les conditions cognitives de l’apprentissage de la géométrie: développement de la visualisation, différenciation des raisonnements et coordination de leurs fonctionnements , 2005 .
[190] D. Grenier,et al. EXPERIMENTATION AND PROOF IN A SOLID GEOMETRY TEACHING SITUATION , 2010 .
[191] Ulrich Kortenkamp,et al. The Cinderella.2 Manual: Working with The Interactive Geometry Software , 2012 .
[192] G. Lakoff,et al. Where mathematics comes from : how the embodied mind brings mathematics into being , 2002 .
[193] Alain Kuzniak,et al. Understanding the Nature of the Geometric Work Through Its Development and Its Transformations , 2015 .
[194] A. Leung. Variation and mathematics pedagogy , 2012 .