Policy in th e Way of Practice: How A ssessmen t Leg islation I s Affe ctin g Social Stu di es C ur ricu lu m an d I ns tru ction in O hi o

In a national context of standards and high-stakes testing, concerns are emerging about challenges to the already tenuous position of the citizenship mission in the social studies curriculum. In this qualitative study, the authors administered a survey to social studies teachers in Ohio and conducted follow-up interviews focusing on the present purposes of social studies and the ways in which standards and testing are affecting instructional practice. The findings reveal a perception of standards as being of high quality, yet ultimately undermined through changes in scope and se- quence, narrowing of the curriculum, and a paucity of time to enact them. In addition, respondents indicated that high-stakes testing has become the primary curricular focus, which impacts instructional strategy decision making and frustrates citizenship education.

[1]  Linda S. Levstik,et al.  Handbook of Research in Social Studies Education , 2010 .

[2]  R. J. Wright.  Methods for Improving Test Scores: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly , 2009 .

[3]  David Hursh.  High-Stakes Testing and the Decline of Teaching and Learning: The Real Crisis in Education , 2008 .

[4]  Frans H. Doppen,et al.  The State of K-12 Social Studies Instruction in Ohio , 2008, Social Studies Research and Practice.

[5]  Kenneth E. Vogler,et al.  "Just the Facts, Ma'am": Teaching Social Studies in the Era of Standards and High-Stakes Testing , 2007 .

[6]  S. V. Hover,et al.  Virginia vs. Florida: Two Beginning History Teachers’ Perceptions of the Influence of High-Stakes Tests on Their Instructional Decision-Making , 2006, Social Studies Research and Practice.

[7]  Amy J. Good,et al.  One State Closer to a National Crisis: A Report on Elementary Social Studies Education in North Carolina Schools , 2006 .

[8]  Lucien Ellington,et al.  The state of social studies: a national random survey of elementary and middle school social studies teachers , 2006 .

[9]  Kenneth E. Vogler,et al.  To Test or Not to Test?: The Role of Testing in Elementary Social Studies A Collaborative Study Conducted by NCPSSE and SCPSSE , 2006, Social Studies Research and Practice.

[10]  David Gerwin,et al.  The Freedom to Teach: Contrasting History Teaching in Elective and State–Tested Courses , 2006 .

[11]  Kenneth E. Vogler,et al.  Impact of a High School Graduation Examination on Social Studies Teachers' Instructional Practices. , 2005 .

[12]  Joseph Kahne,et al.  What Kind of Citizen? The Politics of Educating for Democracy , 2004 .

[13]  Linda S. Levstik,et al.  Teaching History for the Common Good , 2004 .

[14]  A. Segall.  Teachers' Perceptions of the Impact of State-Mandated Standardized Testing: The Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) as a Case Study of Consequences , 2003 .

[15]  Brett D. Jones,et al.  The Unintended Consequences of High-Stakes Testing , 2003 .

[16]  S. G. Grant.  An Uncertain Lever: Exploring the Influence of State-Level Testing in New York State on Teaching Social Studies , 2001, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[17]  P. Marker.  Standards and High Stakes Testing , 2001 .

[18]  Jean J. Schensul,et al.  Analyzing & interpreting ethnographic data , 1999 .

[19]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[20]  M. Pajares,et al.  Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning Up a Messy Construct , 1992 .

[21]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[22]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Understanding mail survey response behavior: A meta-analysis. , 1991 .

[23]  D. Dillman.  The Design and Administration of Mail Surveys , 1991 .

[24]  M. Crask,et al.  MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATE A META-ANALYSIS OF SELECTED TECHNIQUES FOR INDUCING RESPONSE , 1988 .

[25]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .