Using Digital Images to Characterize Canopy Coverage and Light Interception in a Processing Tomato Crop

Canopy light interception (LI) is a determining factor for crop growth and yield. Crop yield depends on a canopy's capacity to intercept incident solar radiation, which in turn depends on the available leaf area, its structure, and its efficiency in converting the energy captured by the plant into biomass. Digital images offer a series of advantages over other methods of LI estimation, including the possibility to directly process images by computer for which free software is available. The objectives of this work were to develop a simple, economical method for determining LI in low-lying crops such as processing tomato using digital images obtained with a standard, commercial camera and free software and to evaluate the influence of different types of soil coverage (bare soil and plastic mulch) on LI. Photographs of the selected areas were taken using a digital camera at a distance of 160 cm above the center of each area. The resulting digital images were then analyzed with the free software GIMP 2.2 and IMAGE J. Three methods (area (SA), contour (SC). and reclassification (SR)) were used to quantify the percentage of groundcover (PGC). They were applied to the same images and compared with LI as measured with a line quantum sensor at solar noon. There was a close relationship between LI and estimated PGC with all three methods and for different soil cover regimes. In all cases, there was a linear adjustment with a significant correlation coefficient (P < 0.01) and an r 2 of greater than 0.88. The adjustment with RI was narrowest when the SR method was used to estimate PGC (r 2 = 0.93) followed by SC (r 2 = 0.92) and SA (r 2 = 0.88). Measurements of LI based on digital images offered practical advantages with respect to the use of photosynthetically active radiation bars because the latter must be used at solar noon. In contrast, measurements obtained with a digital camera can be taken at any time of day and bright sunshine is not necessary. Different correlations were obtained for bare soil and plastic mulch conditions, so it was necessary to use a different equation to estimate LI under each condition.

[1]  C. Elvidge,et al.  Comparison of broad-band and narrow-band red and near-infrared vegetation indices , 1995 .

[2]  Growth and productivity in forage biomass in relation to the age assessed by dendrochronology in the evergreen shrubCistus ladanifer(L.) using different regression models , 1998 .

[3]  Glen L. Ritchie,et al.  Real-Time Imaging of Ground Cover: Relationships with Radiation Capture, Canopy Photosynthesis, and Daily Growth Rate , 2003 .

[4]  C. Moran,et al.  Compiling a field manual from overhead photographs for estimating crop residue cover , 1991 .

[5]  J. Tarara,et al.  Nondestructive Measurement of Vegetative Cover Using Digital Image Analysis , 2004 .

[6]  P. Boissard,et al.  Estimation of the ground cover ratio of a wheat canopy using radiometry , 1992 .

[7]  C. S. T. Daughtry,et al.  Techniques for Measuring Intercepted and Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation in Corn Canopies1 , 1986 .

[8]  J. E. Board,et al.  Temporal Importance of Greater Light Interception to Increased Yield in Narrow-Row Soybean , 1992 .

[9]  J. Morgan,et al.  Photosynthesis and Growth of Bermudagrass Swards. I. Carbon Dioxide Exchange Characteristics of Swards Mowed at Weekly and Monthly Intervals1 , 1983 .

[10]  R M Gifford,et al.  Crop Productivity and Photoassimilate Partitioning , 1984, Science.

[11]  M. Bauer,et al.  Spectral estimators of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation in corn canopies. , 1985 .

[12]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements , 1998 .

[13]  S. Running,et al.  Measuring Fractional Cover and Leaf Area Index in Arid Ecosystems: Digital Camera, Radiation Transmittance, and Laser Altimetry Methods , 2000 .

[14]  Robert P. Ewing,et al.  Quantitative color image analysis of agronomic images , 1999 .

[15]  C. Daughtry,et al.  Costs of Measuring Leaf Area Index of Corn , 1984 .

[16]  G. F. Arkin,et al.  A Light Interception Method for Measuring Row Crop Ground Cover , 1977 .

[17]  Robert S. Loomis,et al.  Crop Ecology: Productivity and Management in Agricultural Systems , 1992 .

[18]  David G. Reta-Sánchez,et al.  Canopy Light Environment and Yield of Narrow-Row Cotton as Affected by Canopy Architecture , 2002 .

[19]  A. Koppel,et al.  Estimation of leaf area and its vertical distribution during growth period , 2000 .

[20]  Lauren T. Bennett,et al.  Close-range vertical photography for measuring cover changes in perennial grasslands. , 2000 .

[21]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Estimation of leaf area index in fourteen southern Wisconsin forest stands using a portable radiometer. , 1990, Tree physiology.

[22]  Larry C. Purcell,et al.  Soybean Canopy Coverage and Light Interception Measurements Using Digital Imagery , 2000 .

[23]  J. Norman,et al.  Crop structure and the penetration of direct sunlight , 1985 .

[24]  D. Egli.  Mechanisms Responsible for Soybean Yield Response to Equidistant Planting Patterns , 1994 .

[25]  Raffaele Casa,et al.  Radiation measurement for plant ecophysiology. , 2003, Journal of experimental botany.

[26]  Douglas E. Karcher,et al.  Quantifying Turfgrass Cover Using Digital Image Analysis , 2001 .

[27]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Revised FAO Procedures for Calculating Evapotranspiration: Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56 with Testing in Idaho , 2001 .

[28]  W. Wilhelm,et al.  Comparison of three leaf area index meters in a corn canopy , 2000 .

[29]  Video image analysis as a nondestructive measure of plant vigor for precision agriculture , 1996 .

[30]  Jerry L. Hatfield,et al.  Intercepted photosynthetically active radiation estimated by spectral reflectance , 1984 .