Comfort and Safety as Perceived by Wheelchair-Seated Bus Passengers

Abstract Wheelchair-seated passengers on European and Swedish urban transit buses can travel rearwards, resting against a bulkhead, without the use of tie-down equipment. However, users sometimes disapprove of being the only passengers who have to travel rearwards, and also unrestrained. In order to investigate comfort and safety as perceived by wheelchair-seated bus passengers riding either forwards or rearwards, an experimental field study was carried out. Participating subjects were 31 wheelchair users and a group of 44 ambulant passengers. Each subject made two consecutive, identical 15-minute trips, randomly beginning either forwards or backwards, and interviews were conducted after each trip. During the trips, three-axis bus motion was recorded. The concept of categorization was used as a theoretical background and basis for discussion of the comfort and safety constructs. The results indicated that while the majority preferred the forward-facing position regarding comfort issues, a minority felt that the level of perceived safety was better. Wheelchair-seated passengers were more positive towards the rearward position than the ambulant group.

[1]  Anders Wretstrand,et al.  Safety as perceived by wheelchair-seated passengers in special transportation services. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  P Oxley,et al.  Cross-sector benefits of accessible public transport , 1992 .

[3]  Craig McGarty,et al.  Categorization in social psychology , 1999 .

[4]  M. Griffin,et al.  Motion sickness in public road transport: the relative importance of motion, vision and individual differences. , 1999, British journal of psychology.

[5]  M J Griffin,et al.  Motion sickness in public road transport: passenger behavior and susceptibility. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[6]  Torbjörn Falkmer,et al.  Perceived risk among parents concerning the travel situation for children with disabilities. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Stig Knutsson Funktionshindrades värdering av färdtjänst , 1998 .

[8]  Philip R Oxley Compliance costs for the bus industry: The impacts of the Disability Discrimination Act, 1995, on local bus services , 1998 .

[9]  Jonathan Levine,et al.  Who Noticed, Who Cares? Passenger Reactions to Transit Safety Measures , 1999 .

[10]  G Shaw Wheelchair rider risk in motor vehicles: a technical note. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[11]  M J Griffin,et al.  Motion sickness in public road transport: the effect of driver, route and vehicle. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[12]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  Gender, race, and perceived risk: The 'white male' effect , 2000 .

[13]  J A Levis,et al.  PASSENGER PROBLEMS ON MOVING BUSES , 1978 .

[14]  Michael Billig,et al.  Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology , 1987 .

[15]  U Rutenberg ACCOMMODATING MOBILITY-AIDS ON CANADIAN LOW-FLOOR BUSES USING THE REAR FACING POSITION DESIGN: EXPERIENCE, ISSUES AND REQUIREMENTS , 2000 .

[16]  Colin Barnes,et al.  Exploring Disability: A Sociological Introduction , 1999 .

[17]  F Blennemann GERMAN EXPERIENCE OF CARRYING WHEELCHAIRS IN LOW FLOOR BUSES , 1995 .