Producing Pronouns and Definite Noun Phrases: Do Speakers Use the Addressee's Discourse Model?

We report two experiments that investigated the widely held assumption that speakers use the addressee's discourse model when choosing referring expressions (e.g., Ariel, 1990; Chafe, 1994; Givón, 1983; Prince, 1985), by manipulating whether the addressee could hear the immediately preceding linguistic context. Experiment 1 showed that speakers increased pronoun use (and decreased noun phrase use) when the referent was mentioned in the immediately preceding sentence compared to when it was not, even though the addressee did not hear the preceding sentence, indicating that speakers used their own, privileged discourse model when choosing referring expressions. The same pattern of results was found in Experiment 2. Speakers produced more pronouns when the immediately preceding sentence mentioned the referent than when it mentioned a referential competitor, regardless of whether the sentence was shared with their addressee. Thus, we conclude that choice of referring expression is determined by the referent's accessibility in the speaker's own discourse model rather than the addressee's.

[1]  Martin J Pickering,et al.  The use of visual context during the production of referring expressions , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  Matthew P. Aylett,et al.  Referential form, duration, and modelling the listener in dialogue. , 2001 .

[4]  Matthew Stone,et al.  Sentence generation as a planning problem , 2007, ACL.

[5]  T. Givón Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction , 1983 .

[6]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[7]  M. Aylett,et al.  Language redundancy predicts syllabic duration and the spectral characteristics of vocalic syllable nuclei. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  A. Almor,et al.  Noun-phrase anaphors and focus: the informational load hypothesis. , 1999, Psychological review.

[9]  Thomas Hofmann,et al.  Speakers optimize information density through syntactic reduction , 2007 .

[10]  Wilbert Spooren,et al.  Text representation : linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects , 2001 .

[11]  Mija M. Van Der Wege Lexical Entrainment and Lexical Differentiation in Reference Phrase Choice. , 2009 .

[12]  Roger P. G. van Gompel,et al.  Choosing anaphoric expressions : do people take into account likelihood of reference? , 2010 .

[13]  Hua Cheng,et al.  Integrating Referring and Informing in NP Planning , 1998 .

[14]  A J Schafer,et al.  Intonational Disambiguation in Sentence Production and Comprehension , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[15]  Jeanette K. Gundel,et al.  Cognitive Status and the form of Referring Expressions in Discourse , 1993, The Oxford Handbook of Reference.

[16]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Discourse: The Establishment and Maintenance of Reference , 2022 .

[17]  Graeme Hirst,et al.  Collaborating on Referring Expressions , 1991, CL.

[18]  付伶俐 打磨Using Language,倡导新理念 , 2014 .

[19]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Audience Design in Meaning and Reference , 1982 .

[20]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  Lexical Entrainment in Written Discourse: Is Experts' Word Use Adapted to the Addressee? , 2008 .

[21]  Siobhan Chapman Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[22]  Robert Dale,et al.  Computational Interpretations of the Gricean Maxims in the Generation of Referring Expressions , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  S. Brennan,et al.  Addressees' needs influence speakers' early syntactic choices , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  R. Gerrig,et al.  Speakers’ experiences and audience design: knowing when and knowing how to adjust utterances to addressees☆ , 2002 .

[25]  D. Barr,et al.  Perspective taking and the coordination of meaning in language use , 2006 .

[26]  C. Roßnagel,et al.  Lost in thought: cognitive load and the processing of addressees' feedback in verbal communication. , 2004, Experimental Psychology.

[27]  Douglas E. Appelt,et al.  Planning English Referring Expressions , 1985, Artif. Intell..

[28]  Douglas E. Appelt,et al.  Some Pragmatic Issues in the Planning of Definite & Indefinite Noun Phrases , 1985, ACL.

[29]  W. Chafe Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view , 1976 .

[30]  S. Brennan,et al.  Attenuating Information in Spoken Communication: For the Speaker, or for the Addressee?. , 2010 .

[31]  Kumiko Fukumura,et al.  The effect of animacy on the choice of referring expression , 2011 .

[32]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[33]  Dan Jurafsky,et al.  Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  The Effect of Thematic Roles on Pronoun Use and Frequency of Reference Continuation , 2001 .

[35]  Douglas E. Appelt,et al.  A Computational Model of Referring , 1987, IJCAI.

[36]  D. Barr,et al.  Limits on theory of mind use in adults , 2003, Cognition.

[37]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Language production : Grammatical encoding , 1994 .

[38]  Roger P. G. van Gompel,et al.  How does similarity-based interference affect the choice of referring expression? , 2011 .

[39]  T. Florian Jaeger,et al.  Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[40]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  William D. Raymond,et al.  Probabilistic Relations between Words: Evidence from Reduction in Lexical Production , 2008 .

[42]  R. Gerrig,et al.  The impact of memory demands on audience design during language production , 2005, Cognition.

[43]  William S. Horton,et al.  Conversational Common Ground and Memory Processes in Language Production , 2005 .

[44]  Mira Ariel Accessibility theory: An overview , 2001 .

[45]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Approaches to studying world-situated language use : bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions , 2005 .

[46]  Rosemary J. Stevenson,et al.  Thematic roles, focus and the representation of events , 1994 .

[47]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Evidence of Perspective-Taking Constraints in Children's On-Line Reference Resolution , 2002, Psychological science.

[48]  Christian Nagel Cognitive load and perspective‐taking: applying the automatic‐controlled distinction to verbal communication , 2000 .

[49]  S. Brennan,et al.  Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: For the speaker or for the addressee? , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[50]  Jerome A. Niles,et al.  The Context of Comprehension , 1981 .

[51]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  The effect of perceptual availability and prior discourse on young children's use of referring expressions , 2006, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[52]  T. Givón,et al.  The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions , 1992 .

[53]  Alice Turk,et al.  The Smooth Signal Redundancy Hypothesis: A Functional Explanation for Relationships between Redundancy, Prosodic Prominence, and Duration in Spontaneous Speech , 2004, Language and speech.

[54]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Coordinating beliefs in conversation , 1992 .

[55]  G. Dell,et al.  Effect of Ambiguity and Lexical Availability on Syntactic and Lexical Production , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[56]  V. Ferreira,et al.  Speaker-external versus speaker-internal forces on utterance form: do cognitive demands override threats to referential success? , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[57]  William D. Raymond,et al.  The effects of collocational strength and contextual predictability in lexical production 1 , 1999 .

[58]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Mechanisms for Listener-Adaptation in Language Production: Limiting the Role of the "Model of the Listener" , 2013 .

[59]  C. Fletcher Markedness and topic continuity in discourse processing , 1984 .

[60]  Emiel Krahmer,et al.  Toward a Computational Psycholinguistics of Reference Production , 2012, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[61]  J. Trueswell,et al.  Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context , 2003 .

[62]  M. Pickering,et al.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[63]  A Pollatsek,et al.  On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[64]  Victor S. Ferreira,et al.  How do speakers avoid ambiguous linguistic expressions? , 2005, Cognition.

[65]  Scott Weinstein,et al.  Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse , 1995, CL.

[66]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[67]  Jeanette K. Gundel,et al.  Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse , 1993 .

[68]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[69]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Reliability of prosodic cues for resolving syntactic ambiguity. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[70]  H. H. Clark,et al.  References in Conversation Between Experts and Novices , 1987 .

[71]  S. Brennan Centering Attention in Discourse. , 1995 .

[72]  Christian Nagel Cognitive load and perspective‐taking: applying the automatic‐controlled distinction to verbal communication , 2000 .

[73]  B. Keysar,et al.  When do speakers take into account common ground? , 1996, Cognition.

[74]  G. Dell,et al.  Adapting production to comprehension: The explicit mention of instruments , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[75]  Ellen Gurman Bard,et al.  The effect of repetition on words in recorded dictations , 1989, EUROSPEECH.

[76]  Mira Ariel Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents , 1990 .

[77]  E. Prince Fancy syntax and ‘shared knowledge’ , 1985 .