Impact of the introduction and withdrawal of financial incentives on the delivery of alcohol screening and brief advice in English primary health care: an interrupted time-series analysis.

AIM To evaluate the impact of the introduction and withdrawal of financial incentives on alcohol screening and brief advice delivery in English primary care. DESIGN Interrupted time-series using data from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database. Data were split into three periods: (1) before the introduction of financial incentives (1 January 2006-31 March 2008); (2) during the implementation of financial incentives (1 April 2008-31 March 2015); and (3) after the withdrawal of financial incentives (1 April 2015-31 December 2016). Segmented regression models were fitted, with slope and step change coefficients at both intervention points. SETTING England. PARTICIPANTS Newly registered patients (16+) in 500 primary care practices for 2006-16 (n = 4 278 723). MEASUREMENTS The outcome measures were percentage of patients each month who: (1) were screened for alcohol use; (2) screened positive for higher-risk drinking; and (3) were reported as having received brief advice on alcohol consumption. FINDINGS There was no significant change in the percentage of newly registered patients who were screened for alcohol use when financial incentives were introduced. However, the percentage fell (P < 0.001) immediately when incentives were withdrawn, and fell by a further 2.96 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.21-3.70] patients per 1000 each month thereafter. After the introduction of incentives, there was an immediate increase of 9.05 (95% CI = 3.87-14.23) per 1000 patients screening positive for higher-risk drinking, but no significant further change over time. Withdrawal of financial incentives was associated with an immediate fall in screen-positive rates of 29.96 (95% CI = 19.56-40.35) per 1000 patients, followed by a rise each month thereafter of 2.14 (95% CI = 1.51-2.77) per 1000. Screen-positive patients recorded as receiving alcohol brief advice increased by 20.15 (95% CI = 12.30-28.00) per 1000 following the introduction of financial incentives, and continued to increase by 0.39 (95% CI = 0.26-0.53) per 1000 monthly until withdrawal. At this point, delivery of brief advice fell by 18.33 (95% CI = 11.97-24.69) per 1000 patients and continued to fall by a further 0.70 (95% CI = 0.28-1.12) per 1000 per month. CONCLUSIONS Removing a financial incentive for alcohol prevention in English primary care was associated with an immediate and sustained reduction in the rate of screening for alcohol use and brief advice provision. This contrasts with no, or limited, increase in screening and brief advice delivery rates following the introduction of the scheme.

[1]  S. Michie,et al.  Understanding and using time series analyses in addiction research. , 2019, Addiction.

[2]  Alice M Dalton,et al.  Changes in health in the countries of the UK and 150 English Local Authority areas 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 , 2018, The Lancet.

[3]  B. Guthrie,et al.  Quality of Care in the United Kingdom after Removal of Financial Incentives , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Dan J Stein,et al.  Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 , 2018, Lancet.

[5]  S. Dosani,et al.  Living in Britain , 2018, Making it in British Medicine.

[6]  F. Beyer,et al.  Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations. , 2018, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[7]  A. Schilder,et al.  Effectiveness of UK provider financial incentives on quality of care: a systematic review. , 2017, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[8]  P. Bendtsen,et al.  Delivery of Brief Interventions for Heavy Drinking in Primary Care: Outcomes of the ODHIN 5-Country Cluster Randomized Trial , 2017, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[9]  E. Kaner,et al.  Are Brief Alcohol Interventions Adequately Embedded in UK Primary Care? A Qualitative Study Utilising Normalisation Process Theory , 2017, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[10]  D. Kansagara,et al.  The Effects of Pay-for-Performance Programs on Health, Health Care Use, and Processes of Care , 2017, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  F. Hamilton,et al.  Impact of Financial Incentives on Alcohol Consumption Recording in Primary Health Care Among Adults with Schizophrenia and Other Psychoses: A Cross-Sectional and Retrospective Cohort Study , 2016, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[12]  E. Kaner,et al.  Impact of financial incentives on alcohol intervention delivery in primary care: a mixed-methods study , 2016, BMC Family Practice.

[13]  M. Laurant,et al.  Improving the delivery of brief interventions for heavy drinking in primary health care: outcome results of the Optimizing Delivery of Health Care Intervention (ODHIN) five-country cluster randomized factorial trial. , 2016, Addiction.

[14]  T. Sheldon,et al.  The effectiveness of payment for performance in health care: A meta-analysis and exploration of variation in outcomes. , 2016, Health policy.

[15]  M. Roland,et al.  Can pay for performance improve the quality of primary care? , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[16]  A. Ryan,et al.  Long-term evidence for the effect of pay-for-performance in primary care on mortality in the UK: a population study , 2016, The Lancet.

[17]  J. Rehm,et al.  Alcohol Use Disorders in Primary Health Care: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? , 2016, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[18]  L. Kriston,et al.  Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of alcohol screening with brief interventions for patients in emergency care settings. , 2016, Addiction.

[19]  D. Kansagara,et al.  Implementation Processes and Pay for Performance in Healthcare: A Systematic Review , 2016, Journal of general internal medicine.

[20]  Robert West,et al.  Comparison of brief interventions in primary care on smoking and excessive alcohol consumption: a population survey in England , 2015, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[21]  J. Car,et al.  Effect of financial incentives on delivery of alcohol screening and brief intervention (ASBI) in primary care: longitudinal study. , 2014, Journal of public health.

[22]  Idris A. Eckley,et al.  changepoint: An R Package for Changepoint Analysis , 2014 .

[23]  D. Reeves,et al.  ClinicalCodes: An Online Clinical Codes Repository to Improve the Validity and Reproducibility of Research Using Electronic Medical Records , 2014, PloS one.

[24]  J. Valderas,et al.  Withdrawing performance indicators: retrospective analysis of general practice performance under UK Quality and Outcomes Framework , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  Robert B. Penfold,et al.  Use of interrupted time series analysis in evaluating health care quality improvements. , 2013, Academic pediatrics.

[26]  K. Walters,et al.  Alcohol consumption screening of newly-registered patients in primary care: a cross-sectional analysis , 2013, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[27]  V. Moyer,et al.  Primary Care Interventions to Prevent Child Maltreatment: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[28]  V. Moyer.  Screening and Behavioral Counseling Interventions in Primary Care to Reduce Alcohol Misuse: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[29]  L. Preston,et al.  Modelling the cost-effectiveness of alcohol screening and brief interventions in primary care in England. , 2013, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[30]  Kate Walters,et al.  Identifying periods of acceptable computer usage in primary care research databases , 2013, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[31]  E. Kaner,et al.  Screening of high-risk drinkers , 2013 .

[32]  Judith A. Long,et al.  Provider and Patient Directed Financial Incentives to Improve Care and Outcomes for Patients with Diabetes , 2013, Current Diabetes Reports.

[33]  M. Laurant,et al.  Involvement of general practitioners in managing alcohol problems: a randomized controlled trial of a tailored improvement programme. , 2012, Addiction.

[34]  Kati K Seppänen,et al.  Institutionalization of brief alcohol intervention in primary health care-the Finnish case. , 2012, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[35]  J M Mason,et al.  Incentivizing preventive services in primary care: perspectives on Local Enhanced Services. , 2011, Journal of public health.

[36]  Richard H. Jones,et al.  Bayesian information criterion for longitudinal and clustered data , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[37]  Elena Parmelli,et al.  An overview of reviews evaluating the effectiveness of financial incentives in changing healthcare professional behaviours and patient outcomes. , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[38]  A. Bourke,et al.  Generalisability of The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database: demographics, chronic disease prevalence and mortality rates. , 2011, Informatics in primary care.

[39]  Lisa Herzog.  Higher and lower virtues in commercial society , 2011 .

[40]  N. Heather,et al.  The research translation problem: Alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care – Real world evidence supports theory , 2010 .

[41]  J. Selby,et al.  The impact of removing financial incentives from clinical quality indicators: longitudinal analysis of four Kaiser Permanente indicators , 2010, British medical journal.

[42]  D. Kivlahan,et al.  The AUDIT Alcohol Consumption Questions (AUDIT-C) An Effective Brief Screening Test for Problem Drinking , 2010 .

[43]  Irene Petersen,et al.  Creating medical and drug code lists to identify cases in primary care databases , 2009, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[44]  M. Johnston,et al.  Are there valid proxy measures of clinical behaviour? a systematic review , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[45]  Jürgen Rehm,et al.  Global burden of disease and injury and economic cost attributable to alcohol use and alcohol-use disorders , 2009, The Lancet.

[46]  A. Maguire,et al.  The importance of defining periods of complete mortality reporting for research using automated data from primary care , 2009, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[47]  Katherine Perryman,et al.  Low identification of alcohol use disorders in general practice in England. , 2008, Addiction.

[48]  G. Zarkin,et al.  The Effect of Screening and Brief Intervention for Risky Drinking on Health Care Utilization in Managed Care Organizations , 2007, Medical care.

[49]  Paul G Shekelle,et al.  The Effect of a Quality Improvement Initiative on the Quality of Other Aspects of Health Care: The Law of Unintended Consequences? , 2007, Medical care.

[50]  Evangelos Kontopantelis,et al.  Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[51]  C. Weel,et al.  The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges. , 2006, Family practice.

[52]  P. C. Weaver,et al.  Measuring clinical performance using routinely collected clinical data , 2005, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[53]  J. Saunders,et al.  A multicountry controlled trial of strategies to promote dissemination and implementation of brief alcohol intervention in primary health care: findings of a World Health Organization collaborative study. , 2005, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[54]  A. Dhar,et al.  National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence , 2005 .

[55]  M. Goldstein,et al.  Multiple behavioral risk factor interventions in primary care. Summary of research evidence. , 2004, American journal of preventive medicine.

[56]  P. Cuijpers,et al.  The effects on mortality of brief interventions for problem drinking: a meta-analysis. , 2004, Addiction.

[57]  J. Tirole,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation , 2003 .

[58]  A K Wagner,et al.  Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research , 2002, Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics.

[59]  C. T. Orleans,et al.  Evaluating primary care behavioral counseling interventions: an evidence-based approach. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[60]  R. Hodgson,et al.  The FAST Alcohol Screening Test. , 2002, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[61]  E. Deci,et al.  A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[62]  D. Kivlahan,et al.  The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. , 1998, Archives of internal medicine.

[63]  O. Aasland,et al.  Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. , 1993, Addiction.

[64]  J. Chisholm,et al.  The Read clinical classification. , 1990, BMJ.

[65]  D. Black.  HEALTH AND DEPRIVATION: Inequality and the north , 1988 .

[66]  Hrishikesh D. Vinod,et al.  “Generalization of the durbin-watson statistic for higher order autoregressive processes , 1973 .