Fate of mercury in tree litter during decomposition

Abstract. We performed a controlled laboratory litter incubation study to assess changes in dry mass, carbon (C) mass and concentration, mercury (Hg) mass and concentration, and stoichiometric relations between elements during decomposition. Twenty-five surface litter samples each, collected from four forest stands, were placed in incubation jars open to the atmosphere, and were harvested sequentially at 0, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Using a mass balance approach, we observed significant mass losses of Hg during decomposition (5 to 23 % of initial mass after 18 months), which we attribute to gaseous losses of Hg to the atmosphere through a gas-permeable filter covering incubation jars. Percentage mass losses of Hg generally were less than observed dry mass and C mass losses (48 to 63 % Hg loss per unit dry mass loss), although one litter type showed similar losses. A field control study using the same litter types exposed at the original collection locations for one year showed that field litter samples were enriched in Hg concentrations by 8 to 64 % compared to samples incubated for the same time period in the laboratory, indicating strong additional sorption of Hg in the field likely from atmospheric deposition. Solubility of Hg, assessed by exposure of litter to water upon harvest, was very low (

[1]  R. Monson,et al.  Mercury distribution across 14 U.S. Forests. Part I: spatial patterns of concentrations in biomass, litter, and soils. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  M. Lucotte,et al.  Terrestrial organic matter biomarkers as tracers of Hg sources in lake sediments , 2011 .

[3]  Michael R. Olson,et al.  Dry deposition of gaseous elemental mercury to plants and soils using mercury stable isotopes in a controlled environment , 2011 .

[4]  Elsie M. Sunderland,et al.  Anthropogenic impacts on global storage and emissions of mercury from terrestrial soils: Insights from a new global model , 2010 .

[5]  Xinbin Feng,et al.  Elevated atmospheric deposition and dynamics of mercury in a remote upland forest of southwestern China. , 2010, Environmental pollution.

[6]  X. Faïn,et al.  Gaseous elemental mercury emissions and CO(2) respiration rates in terrestrial soils under controlled aerobic and anaerobic laboratory conditions. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  Leiming Zhang,et al.  A review of current knowledge concerning dry deposition of atmospheric mercury , 2009 .

[8]  J. Rudd,et al.  Investigation of uptake and retention of atmospheric Hg(II) by boreal forest plants using stable Hg isotopes. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  David Johnson,et al.  Mercury concentrations and pools in four Sierra Nevada forest sites, and relationships to organic carbon and nitrogen , 2009 .

[10]  M. Gustin,et al.  Nonstomatal versus stomatal uptake of atmospheric mercury. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  J. Finlay,et al.  Effects of stream water chemistry and tree species on release and methylation of mercury during litter decomposition. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Dale W. Johnson,et al.  Atmospheric mercury exchange with a tallgrass prairie ecosystem housed in mesocosms. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  J. Rudd,et al.  Long-term wet and dry deposition of total and methyl mercury in the remote boreal ecoregion of Canada. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  C. Alewell,et al.  Evidence of microbial control of Hg0emissions from uncontaminated terrestrial soils , 2008 .

[15]  W. Eugster,et al.  Elemental mercury fluxes over a sub-alpine grassland determined with two micrometeorological methods , 2008 .

[16]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Mercury emission from terrestrial background surfaces in the eastern USA. Part I: Air/surface exchange of mercury within a southeastern deciduous forest (Tennessee) over one year , 2008 .

[17]  T. Holsen,et al.  Mercury deposition in the Adirondacks: A comparison between precipitation and throughfall , 2008 .

[18]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Mercury emission from terrestrial background surfaces in the eastern USA. II: Air/surface exchange of mercury within forests from South Carolina to New England , 2008 .

[19]  Andrew Heyes,et al.  Whole-ecosystem study shows rapid fish-mercury response to changes in mercury deposition , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Charles T Driscoll,et al.  Mercury cycling in litter and soil in different forest types in the Adirondack region, New York, USA. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[21]  M. Gustin,et al.  Gaseous elemental mercury exchange with low mercury containing soils: Investigation of controlling factors , 2007 .

[22]  D. Obrist.  Atmospheric mercury pollution due to losses of terrestrial carbon pools? , 2007 .

[23]  L. Radke,et al.  Mercury in vegetation and organic soil at an upland boreal forest site in Prince Albert National Park, Saskatchewan, Canada , 2007 .

[24]  F. Marsik,et al.  Estimation of dry deposition of atmospheric mercury in Nevada by direct and indirect methods. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  D. Jacob,et al.  Chemical cycling and deposition of atmospheric mercury : Global constraints from observations , 2007 .

[26]  T. Holsen,et al.  Mercury Contamination in Forest and Freshwater Ecosystems in the Northeastern United States , 2007 .

[27]  D. Obrist,et al.  Mercury accumulation in grass and forb species as a function of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations and mercury exposures in air and soil. , 2006, Chemosphere.

[28]  D. Obrist,et al.  Foliar mercury accumulation and exchange for three tree species. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  A. Austin,et al.  Plant litter decomposition in a semi-arid ecosystem controlled by photodegradation , 2006, Nature.

[30]  Aria Amirbahman,et al.  Litterfall Mercury in Two Forested Watersheds at Acadia National Park, Maine, USA , 2006 .

[31]  R. Siegwolf,et al.  Estimation of Hg0 exchange between ecosystems and the atmosphere using 222Rn and Hg0 concentration changes in the stable nocturnal boundary layer , 2006 .

[32]  D. Krabbenhoft,et al.  Assessing the potential for re-emission of mercury deposited in precipitation from arid soils using a stable isotope. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  V. Kitunen,et al.  Organic matter characteristics and C and N transformations in the humus layer under two tree species, Betula pendula and Picea abies , 2005 .

[34]  V. S. St. Louis,et al.  Methylmercury and total mercury in plant litter decomposing in upland forests and flooded landscapes. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[35]  M. Gustin,et al.  Foliar exchange of mercury as a function of soil and air mercury concentrations. , 2004, The Science of the total environment.

[36]  D. E. Schorran,et al.  Assessing the source of mercury in foliar tissue of quaking aspen , 2003, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[37]  D. E. Schorran,et al.  Accumulation of atmospheric mercury in forest foliage , 2003 .

[38]  D. F. Grigal.  Mercury sequestration in forests and peatlands: a review. , 2003, Journal of environmental quality.

[39]  R. Mason,et al.  Role of the ocean in the global mercury cycle , 2002 .

[40]  Reed C. Harris,et al.  Reactivity and mobility of new and old mercury deposition in a boreal forest ecosystem during the first year of the METAALICUS study. Mercury Experiment To Assess Atmospheric Loading In Canada and the US. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[41]  P. Schuster,et al.  Atmospherc mercury deposition during the last 270 years: a glacial ice core record of natural and anthropogenic sources. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[42]  D. F. Grigal.  Inputs and outputs of mercury from terrestrial watersheds: a review , 2002 .

[43]  S. Lindberg,et al.  Mercury Accumulation in Foliage over Time in Two Northern Mixed-Hardwood Forests , 2002 .

[44]  M. Engle,et al.  Quantifying natural source mercury emissions from the Ivanhoe Mining District, north-central Nevada, USA , 2001 .

[45]  J. Rudd,et al.  Importance of the forest canopy to fluxes of methyl mercury and total mercury to boreal ecosystems. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[46]  S. Lindberg,et al.  Mercury Air/Surface Exchange Kinetics of Background Soils of the Tahquamenon River Watershed in the Michigan Upper Peninsula , 2001 .

[47]  C. Prescott,et al.  Decomposition of broadleaf and needle litter in forests of British Columbia: influences of litter type, forest type, and litter mixtures , 2000 .

[48]  E. Matzner,et al.  Pools and fluxes of mercury and methylmercury in two forested catchments in Germany. , 2000, The Science of the total environment.

[49]  S. Lindberg,et al.  Assessment of dry deposition and foliar leaching of mercury and selected trace elements based on washed foliar and surrogate surfaces , 2000 .

[50]  D. F. Grigal,et al.  Mercury budget of an upland-peatland watershed , 2000 .

[51]  S. Sundarapandian,et al.  Litter production and leaf-litter decomposition of selected tree species in tropical forests at Kodayar in the Western Ghats, India , 1999 .

[52]  N. Kaneko,et al.  Mixed leaf litter effects on decomposition rates and soil microarthropod communities in an oak–pine stand in Japan , 1999, Ecological Research.

[53]  D. F. Grigal,et al.  Mercury and Organic Carbon Relationships in Streams Draining Forested Upland/Peatland Watersheds , 1999 .

[54]  C. Driscoll,et al.  Historical trends of mercury deposition in Adirondack lakes , 1999 .

[55]  J. Fyles,et al.  Litter decomposition rates in Canadian forests , 1999 .

[56]  E. Holland,et al.  Analysis of litter decomposition in an alpine tundra , 1998 .

[57]  A. Heyes,et al.  Mercury and methylmercury in decomposing vegetation of a pristine and impounded wetland , 1998 .

[58]  Charles D. Canham,et al.  CANOPY TREE–SOIL INTERACTIONS WITHIN TEMPERATE FORESTS: SPECIES EFFECTS ON SOIL CARBON AND NITROGEN , 1998 .

[59]  L. Poissant,et al.  Water-air and soil-air exchange rate of total gaseous mercury measured at background sites , 1998 .

[60]  J. Munthe,et al.  An examination of current Hg deposition and export in Fenno-Scandian catchments , 1998 .

[61]  William F. Fitzgerald,et al.  The Case for Atmospheric Mercury Contamination in Remote Areas , 1998 .

[62]  S. Lindberg,et al.  Sunlight-Mediated Emission of Elemental Mercury from Soil Amended with Municipal Sewage Sludge , 1997 .

[63]  George E. Taylor,et al.  Effect of temperature and air movement on the flux of elemental mercury from substrate to the atmosphere , 1997 .

[64]  G. Keeler,et al.  The deposition of mercury in throughfall and litterfall in the lake champlain watershed: A short-term study , 1996 .

[65]  S. Lindberg,et al.  Forests and the Global Biogeochemical Cycle of Mercury: The Importance of Understanding Air/Vegetation Exchange Processes , 1996 .

[66]  M. Lucotte,et al.  Mercury and lead profiles and burdens in soils of Quebec (Canada) before and after flooding , 1995 .

[67]  P. Hanson,et al.  Foliar exchange of mercury vapor: Evidence for a compensation point , 1995 .

[68]  Charles T. Driscoll,et al.  The role of dissolved organic carbon in the chemistry and bioavailability of mercury in remote Adirondack lakes , 1995 .

[69]  P. Bottner,et al.  Litter decomposition, climate and liter quality. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[70]  J. Joslin.  Regional differences in mercury levels in aquatic ecosystems: A discussion of possible causal factors with implications for the Tennessee river system and the Northern Hemisphere , 1994 .

[71]  James H. Weber,et al.  Review of possible paths for abiotic methylation of mercury(II) in the aquatic environment , 1993 .

[72]  R. R. Turner,et al.  Atmosphere-surface exchange of mercury in a forest: Results of modeling and gradient approaches , 1992 .

[73]  D. F. Grigal,et al.  Regional trends in mercury distribution across the Great Lakes states, north central USA , 1992, Nature.

[74]  E. Bringmark,et al.  Occurence and transport of mercury within a small catchment area , 1991 .

[75]  Å. Iverfeldt.  Mercury in forest canopy throughfall water and its relation to atmospheric deposition , 1991 .

[76]  G. Mierle,et al.  The role of humic substances in the mobilization of mercury from watersheds , 1991 .

[77]  M. Meili.  The coupling of mercury and organic matter in the biogeochemical cycle — towards a mechanistic model for the boreal forest zone , 1991 .

[78]  B. Allard,et al.  Abiotic reduction of mercury by humic substances in aquatic system — an important process for the mercury cycle , 1991 .

[79]  G. Mierle.  Aqueous inputs of mercury to precambrian shield lakes in ontario , 1990 .

[80]  E. Paul,et al.  Soil microbiology and biochemistry. , 1998 .

[81]  J. Gosz,et al.  The Role of Carbon-Based Plant Secondary Metabolites in Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[82]  Jackson R. Webster,et al.  VASCULAR PLANT BREAKDOWN IN FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS , 1986 .

[83]  R. Rogers,et al.  Factors influencing the volatilization of mercury from soil , 1979 .

[84]  C. Harriss,et al.  Mercury enrichment in estuarine plant detritus , 1974 .

[85]  L. Tea,et al.  Dynamics of carbon and nitrogen mineralization in relation to stand type , stand age and soil texture in the boreal mixedwood , 2022 .