Environmental Performance Metrics For Oil Spill Response

An intensification of interest in environmental assessment during the last two decades has driven corporate efforts to better document environmental goals, improve environmental management systems, and increase awareness of the environmental and ecological effects of business operations. This trend has been motivated partly by regulatory requirements (such as the Toxics Release Inventory in the United States and extended product responsibility laws in the European Union) and partly by the inclination of some large manufacturing firms to embrace a broader social and environmental mission characterized as sustainability or eco-efficiency. The importance of management for measurable objectives in the United States government has been recognized at least since the Government Performance Results Act of 1993, which was intended to both improve the efficiency of government and the confidence of the American public in government managers. However, in management of environmental crises such as oil or chemical spills development of measurable performance standards has lagged. Consequently, government spill managers are unable to define success in terms that are easily communicated to public and other stakeholder groups, and they may be disadvantaged in their efforts to deploy response resources with maximum efficiency. This paper reviews the current state of environmental assessment measures and compares that to current practices and strategic goals among federal agencies with regard to oil and chemical spills. A general typology of metrics applicable to spills is presented that may facilitate incorporation of existing metrics into spill response, restoration, and recovery planning and improve communication among different federal, state, and local agencies and public or stakeholder groups.

[1]  G. Schüürmann,et al.  Ecotoxicology : ecological fundamentals, chemical exposure, and biological effects , 1998 .

[2]  Thomas P. Seager,et al.  A taxonomy of metrics for testing the industrial ecology hypotheses and application to design of freezer insulation , 2004 .

[3]  Peter C. Schulze,et al.  Measures of environmental performance and ecosystem condition , 1999 .

[4]  Maria L. Loureiro,et al.  Estimated costs and admissible claims linked to the Prestige oil spill , 2006 .

[5]  D. Bryant,et al.  Environmental indicators : a systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development , 1995 .

[6]  Clarissa Lovato Melo,et al.  Evaluation of Volume and Performance of a Free Phase Recovery System in an Oil Spill – Case Study of an Accident in Araucária, Brazil , 2003 .

[7]  Capt Joseph T. Kuchin,et al.  Measuring Response: A Balanced Response Scorecard for Evaluating Success , 1999 .

[8]  Inho Kim Ten years after the enactment of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990: a success or a failure , 2002 .

[9]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Evaluating the environmental impact of products and production processes: a comparison of six methods , 1997 .

[10]  Kurt Hansen,et al.  Fast Water Response Equipment Performance in Two Inland Rivers1 , 2003 .

[11]  A. McMichael,et al.  Assessing ecosystem health. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  Igor Linkov,et al.  From optimization to adaptation: shifting paradigms in environmental management and their application to remedial decisions. , 2006, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[13]  David J. Rapport Gaining Respectability: Development of Quantitative Methods in Ecosystem Health , 1999 .

[14]  D. J. Graham,et al.  Performance tests of four selected oil spill skimmers. Final report , 1978 .

[15]  Martha Grabowski,et al.  Advances in Expert Systems for Management , 1993 .

[16]  D. Shaw,et al.  The Exxon Valdez Oil-spill: Ecological and Social Consequences , 1992, Environmental Conservation.

[17]  Braden Allenby,et al.  Hierarchical metrics for sustainability , 2002 .

[18]  H. W. Lichte SKIMMING BARRIER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: OFFSHORE VERSION AND HARBOR VERSION1 , 1979 .

[19]  C M Neumann Improving the U.S. EPA Toxic Release Inventory database for environmental health research. , 1998, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[20]  Michael E. Schlesinger,et al.  Assessment of the effect of the Montreal Protocol on atmospheric ozone , 2001 .

[21]  P. Wiedemann,et al.  Risk management and sustainable development: mutual lessons from approaches to the use of indicators , 1999 .

[22]  Robert P. LaBelle,et al.  Update of Comparative Occurrence Rates for Offshore Oil Spills , 2000 .

[23]  Xander Olsthoorn,et al.  Environmental Indicators for Business: A Review of the Literature and Standardisation Methods , 2001 .

[24]  Wilbert E. Wilhelm,et al.  Prescribing tactical response for oil spill clean up operations , 1997 .

[25]  Communicating about environmental indicators , 2005 .