A Nested Sampling Algorithm for Cosmological Model Selection

The abundance of new cosmological data becoming available means that a wider range of cosmological models are testable than ever before. However, an important distinction must be made between parameter fitting and model selection. While parameter fitting simply determines how well a model fits the data, model selection statistics, such as the Bayesian Evidence, are now necessary to choose between these different models, and in particular to assess the need for new parameters. We implement a new evidence algorithm known as nested sampling, which combines accuracy, generality of application and computational feasibility, and apply it to some cosmological datasets and models. We find that a five-parameter model with Harrison–Zel’dovich initial spectrum is currently preferred. Subject headings: cosmology: theory

[1]  H. Jeffreys,et al.  Theory of probability , 1896 .

[2]  Sylvia Richardson,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice , 1997 .

[3]  R. Ellis,et al.  The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: the power spectrum and the matter content of the Universe , 2001, astro-ph/0105252.

[4]  C. L. Kuo,et al.  High-Resolution Observations of the Cosmic Microwave Background Power Spectrum with ACBAR , 2002, astro-ph/0212289.

[5]  The Anisotropy of the Microwave Background to l = 3500: Mosaic Observations with the Cosmic Background Imager , 2002, astro-ph/0205388.

[6]  A. Lewis,et al.  Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: A Monte Carlo approach , 2002, astro-ph/0205436.

[7]  R. Ellis,et al.  Parameter constraints for flat cosmologies from cosmic microwave background and 2dFGRS power spectra , 2002, astro-ph/0206256.

[8]  Edward J. Wollack,et al.  First year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: Determination of cosmological parameters , 2003, astro-ph/0302209.

[9]  A. Slosar,et al.  Bayesian joint analysis of cluster weak lensing and Sunyaev–Zel'dovich effect data , 2003, astro-ph/0307098.

[10]  R. Nichol,et al.  The 3D power spectrum of galaxies from the SDSS , 2003, astro-ph/0310725.

[11]  Edward J. Wollack,et al.  First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Preliminary Maps and Basic Results , 2003, astro-ph/0302207.

[12]  Andrew H. Jaffe,et al.  Large-scale power in the CMB and new physics: An analysis using Bayesian model comparison , 2003, astro-ph/0308461.

[13]  Andrew R. Liddle,et al.  How many cosmological parameters , 2004, astro-ph/0401198.

[14]  The Essence of Quintessence and the Cost of Compression , 2004, astro-ph/0407364.

[15]  Stefano Casertano,et al.  Type Ia Supernova Discoveries at z > 1 from the Hubble Space Telescope: Evidence for Past Deceleration and Constraints on Dark Energy Evolution , 2004, astro-ph/0402512.

[16]  S. Bridle,et al.  Revealing the Nature of Dark Energy Using Bayesian Evidence , 2003, astro-ph/0305526.

[17]  R. Nichol,et al.  The Three-Dimensional Power Spectrum of Galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2003, astro-ph/0310725.

[18]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[19]  Bayesian model selection and isocurvature perturbations , 2005, astro-ph/0501477.

[20]  Yuhong Yang,et al.  Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms , 2005 .

[21]  P. Gregory Bayesian Logical Data Analysis for the Physical Sciences: The how-to of Bayesian inference , 2005 .

[22]  Philip C. Gregory,et al.  Bayesian Logical Data Analysis for the Physical Sciences: Acknowledgements , 2005 .

[23]  J. Skilling Nested sampling for general Bayesian computation , 2006 .