Capturing Collaboration with Interaction Dynamics Notation

[1]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  Larry Leifer,et al.  Design Whodunit: The Relationship Between Individual Characteristics and Interaction Behaviors in Design Concept Generation , 2017 .

[3]  Ilya Avdeev,et al.  Exploring the dynamic interactions and cognitive characteristics of NSF innovation corps (I-Corps) teams , 2018 .

[4]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Visual Replay Methodology: A Mixed Methods Approach for Group Discussion Analysis , 2019 .

[5]  Mohammad Fazelpour,et al.  An Automated Approach to Recording and Analyzing Design Activities Using a Graphical User Interface , 2019, DAC 2019.

[6]  R. Sosa.  Accretion theory of ideation: evaluation regimes for ideation stages , 2019, Design Science.

[7]  Steven Dow,et al.  How Features of a Civic Design Competition Influences the Collective Understanding of a Problem , 2018, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[8]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[9]  Vladik Kreinovich,et al.  Review of the Book "Mind in Motion: How Action Shapes Thought" by Barbara Tversky, Basic Books, New York, 2019 , 2020, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[10]  Martin Steinert,et al.  Temporal Static Visualisation of Transcripts for Pre-Analysis of Video Material: Identifying Modes of Information Sharing , 2017 .

[11]  Stanko Škec,et al.  A state-transition model of team conceptual design activity , 2019, Research in Engineering Design.

[12]  Ade Mabogunje,et al.  Analyzing the display of professional knowledge through interpersonal interactions in design reviews , 2014 .

[13]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Design Innovation: A Study of Integrated Practice , 2017 .

[14]  Wendy Ju,et al.  People with a Paradigm: The Center for Design Research’s Contributions to Practice , 2016 .

[15]  Chiradeep Sen,et al.  Discovery of Mental Metadata Used for Analogy Formation in Function-Based Design , 2016 .

[16]  Ade Mabogunje,et al.  Design thinking: A new foundational science for engineering , 2016 .

[17]  Nenad Bojčetić,et al.  Relating Problem-Solving Approach to Turn-Taking in Communication of Design Teams , 2019, Tehnicki vjesnik - Technical Gazette.

[18]  E. Turiel,et al.  The Central Role of Culture in Cognitive Evolution: A Reflection on the Myth of the “Isolated Mind” , 2000 .

[19]  Malte Jung,et al.  A Structure for Design Theory , 2014 .

[20]  Ade Mabogunje,et al.  Developing Instrumentation for Design Thinking Team Performance , 2016 .

[21]  K. Jablokow,et al.  Exploring the effects of cognitive style diversity and self-efficacy beliefs on final design attributes in student design teams , 2019, Design Studies.

[22]  Ade Mabogunje,et al.  Visualising professional vision interactions in design reviews , 2016 .

[23]  R. Beaty,et al.  Mining the Role of Design Reflection and Associated Brain Dynamics in Creativity , 2019, Understanding Innovation.

[24]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Empirical Studies of Design Thinking: Past, Present, Future , 2013 .

[25]  Mario Štorga,et al.  Applying Engineering Design Ontology for Content Analysis of Team Conceptual Design Activity , 2019 .

[26]  Stanko Škec,et al.  VERBAL ENGAGEMENT IN TEAMS SOLVING A CONCEPTUAL DESIGN TASK , 2018 .

[27]  David C Rowland,et al.  Place cells, grid cells, and memory. , 2015, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[28]  Gerhard Schwabe,et al.  The power of words: Towards a methodology for progress monitoring in design thinking projects , 2017, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[29]  Rachael Luck,et al.  Seeing architecture in action: designing, evoking, and depicting space and form in embodied interaction , 2014 .

[30]  Mario Štorga,et al.  Revisiting Problem-Solution Co-Evolution in the Context of Team Conceptual Design Activity , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[31]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Design Team Performance: Context, Measurement, and the Prospective Impact of Social Virtual Reality , 2021 .

[32]  Johan Wenngren,et al.  Innovation supports for small-scale development in rural regions: a create, build, test and learn approach , 2020 .

[33]  Ade Mabogunje,et al.  Developing a visual representation to characterize moment-to-moment concept generation in design teams , 2013 .

[34]  Daniel R. Spillane,et al.  Analyzing the Characteristics of Cognitive-Assistant-Facilitated Ideation Groups , 2020, Volume 8: 32nd International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology (DTM).

[35]  Tomislav Martinec,et al.  A model of information processing and interactions in teams developing technical systems , 2019 .

[36]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Empirical Studies of Designer Thinking: Past, Present, and Future , 2015 .

[37]  Gabriela Goldschmidt.  Linkography: Unfolding the Design Process , 2014 .

[38]  Simone Kauffeld,et al.  It All Starts with a Good Idea: A New Coding System for Analyzing Idea Finding Interactions (AIFI) , 2019, HICSS.

[39]  Mario Štorga,et al.  Multifaceted assessment of ideation: using networks to link ideation and design activity , 2015 .

[40]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Augmenting Learning of Design Teamwork Using Immersive Virtual Reality , 2020 .

[41]  G. V. Georgiev,et al.  Polysemy in Design Review Conversations , 2014 .

[42]  Larry Leifer,et al.  Investigating the Influence of Designers’ Cognitive Characteristics and Interaction Behaviors in Design Concept Generation , 2019, Journal of Mechanical Design.

[43]  Tua Björklund,et al.  Measuring the impact of design, service design and design thinking in organizations on different maturity levels , 2018 .