The interaction of drill and practice and error training with individual differences

This article examines the question of whether the effectiveness of training methods in vocational training settings is modified by trainee characteristics. General mental abilities, cognitive style and conscientiousness were measured as person variables that were expected to influence the effectiveness of training methods. Being trained on a simulated process control environment as an example for a complex technological task for 5 h, N = 38 participants received either drill & practice (D&P) or error training (ET) as two distinct training methods. A 70-minute transfer test followed 9 weeks later, in which the trainees had to manage familiar (near transfer) as well as unfamiliar fault states (far transfer). The results showed that high-ability trainees benefited more from D&P than from ET, whereas low-ability trainees benefited equally well from either training method. Furthermore, participants with a highly flexible cognitive style benefited more from D&P rather than ET. Also participants low in conscientiousness profited more from D&P. The findings are indicative of the tentative benefits of using learner-tailored training methods, suggesting that this person-centered approach is worthy of further exploration.

[1]  J. D. de Jong,et al.  An exploration of the relationship between academic and experiential learning approaches in vocational education. , 2006, The British journal of educational psychology.

[2]  Jürgen S. Sauer,et al.  Adaptability of Training in Simulated Process Control: Knowledge- Versus Rule-Based Guidance Under Task Changes and Environmental Stress , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[3]  A. Kluger,et al.  The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. , 1996 .

[4]  G. Saucier Mini-markers: a brief version of Goldberg's unipolar big-five markers. , 1994, Journal of personality assessment.

[5]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Relationship between conscientiousness and learning in employee training: mediating influences of self-deception and self-efficacy. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  F. Schmidt,et al.  The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. , 1998 .

[7]  S. West,et al.  Experimental personality designs: analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions. , 1996, Journal of personality.

[8]  E. Dar-El,et al.  Skill retention and relearning – a proposed cyclical model , 2000 .

[9]  William B. Rouse,et al.  Review and Evaluation of Empirical Research in Troubleshooting , 1985 .

[10]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Book preview , 2003, INTR.

[11]  M. Kozhevnikov Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  Joseph S. Mattoon,et al.  Designing instructional simulations: Effects of instructional control and type of training task on developing display-interpretation skills. , 1994 .

[13]  R. Riding,et al.  Cognitive Styles—an overview and integration , 1991 .

[14]  R. Snow,et al.  Lecture 2: Toward a Theory of Cognitive Aptitude for Learning from Instruction , 1984 .

[15]  E. Salas,et al.  The science of training: a decade of progress. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[16]  Fred Paas,et al.  Instructional design for advanced learners: Establishing connections between the theoretical frameworks of cognitive load and deliberate practice , 2005 .

[17]  J. D. Hagman,et al.  On sustaining procedural skills over a prolonged retention interval. , 1982 .

[18]  Annette Kluge,et al.  The effects of heuristic rule training on operator performance in a simulated process control environment , 2008, Ergonomics.

[19]  Sanghee Yeo Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. , 2010, Korean journal of medical education.

[20]  M. Frese,et al.  Action as the core of work psychology: A German approach. , 1994 .

[21]  P. Kirschner,et al.  Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning , 2003 .

[22]  Marissa L. Shuffler,et al.  Learning, training, and development in organizations , 2012 .

[23]  Michael J. Jacobson,et al.  Hypertext Learning Environments, Cognitive Flexibility, and the Transfer of Complex Knowledge: an Empirical Investigation Center for the Study of Reading Center for the Study of Reading Hypertext Learning Environments, Cognitive Flexibility, and the Transfer of Complex Knowledge: an Empirical Invest , 2007 .

[24]  Sarah Leberman,et al.  The Transfer of Learning: Participants' Perspectives of Adult Education and Training , 2006 .

[25]  Ton de Jong Scaffolds fot scientific discovery learning , 2006 .

[26]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The role of examples and rules in the acquisition of a cognitive skill. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  M. Frese,et al.  Effectiveness of error management training: a meta-analysis. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  R. Riding On the Nature of Cognitive Style , 1997 .

[29]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[30]  M. Frese,et al.  INTEGRATING ERRORS INTO THE TRAINING PROCESS: THE FUNCTION OF ERROR MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTIONS AND THE ROLE OF GOAL ORIENTATION , 2003 .

[31]  Victoria J. Marsick,et al.  Building the learning organisation: a new role for human resource developers , 1992 .

[32]  Michael Frese,et al.  Errors in Training Computer Skills: on the Positive Function of Errors , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[33]  Annette Kluge,et al.  Experience Management by Means of Simulator Trainings in High Reliability Organizations , 2007 .

[34]  J. Colquitt,et al.  Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: a meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[35]  Gilad Chen,et al.  Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[36]  Nic James,et al.  Training to break the barriers of habit in reasoning about unusual faults , 1999 .

[37]  Jürgen Sauer,et al.  Designing training for process control simulators: a review of empirical findings and current practices , 2009 .

[38]  M. D. Dunnette Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[39]  Thomas C. Ormerod,et al.  Using task analysis for information requirements specification: The SGT method. , 2004 .

[40]  Siegfried Hanhard,et al.  Costs and Benefits of Dual Apprenticeship: Lessons from the Swiss System. , 1998 .

[41]  J. Salgado,et al.  Evidence of cross‐cultural invariance of the big five personality dimensions in work settings , 2003 .

[42]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[43]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[44]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[45]  S. Cassidy,et al.  Learning Styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures , 2004 .

[46]  R. Mayer Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[47]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[48]  Annette Kluge,et al.  The predictive qualities of operator characteristics for process control performance: The influence of personality and cognitive variables , 2009, Ergonomics.

[49]  Gerhard Bosch,et al.  Vocational Training and the Labour Market in Liberal and Coordinated Economies , 2008 .

[50]  J. Mathieu,et al.  Toward Theoretically Based Principles of Training Effectiveness: A Model and Initial Empirical Investigation , 1995 .

[51]  Jürgen Sauer,et al.  Cognitive Requirement Analysis to Derive Training Models for Controlling Complex Systems. , 2006 .

[52]  D. Boud Using Experience for Learning , 1993 .

[53]  Emanuel Donchin,et al.  Unsupervised Practice: The Performance of the Control Group , 1989 .

[54]  Tom Kontogiannis,et al.  Training Conditions and Strategic Aspects of Skill Transfer in a Simulated Process Control Task , 1999, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[55]  L. W. Webb,et al.  Students' methods of studying a certain subject--psychology. , 1920 .

[56]  A. Kluge Experiential Learning Methods, Simulation Complexity and Their Effects on Different Target Groups , 2007 .

[57]  E. Sadler‐Smith,et al.  Cognitive style and instructional preferences , 1999 .

[58]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[59]  Thomas R. Carretta,et al.  Role of ability and prior knowledge in complex training performance. , 1995 .

[60]  Annette Kluge,et al.  Designing Training for Temporal and Adaptive Transfer: A Comparative Evaluation of Three Training Methods for Process Control Tasks , 2010 .

[61]  M. David Merrill,et al.  First principles of instruction , 2012 .

[62]  Fred Paas,et al.  Effects of studying sequences of process-oriented and product-oriented worked examples on troubleshooting transfer efficiency , 2008 .

[63]  S. Payne,et al.  The impact of error training and individual differences on training outcomes: an attribute-treatment interaction perspective. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[64]  Robert J. Crutcher,et al.  The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. , 1993 .

[65]  Sarah Leberman,et al.  Transfer of Learning , 2006 .

[66]  C. Parsons,et al.  DISPOSITIONAL INFLUENCES ON TRANSFER OF LEARNING IN MULTISTAGE TRAINING PROGRAMS , 2002 .

[67]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Benefiting from mistakes: The impact of guided errors on learning, performance, and self-efficacy , 2005 .

[68]  Joseph D. Hagman,et al.  Retention of Military Tasks: A Review , 1983 .

[69]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Two epistemic world-views: Prefigurative schemas and learning in complex domains , 1996 .

[70]  Jan Elen,et al.  Handling Complexity in Learning Environments: Theory and Research. Advances in Learning and Instruction. , 2006 .

[71]  Annette Kluge,et al.  Performance Assessments With Microworlds and Their Difficulty , 2008 .

[72]  Michael Frese,et al.  Error training: Replication and the function of exploratory behavior , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[73]  Gilad Chen,et al.  Individual differences, attribute-treatment interactions, and training outcomes. , 2009 .

[74]  Phillip L. Ackerman,et al.  An aptitude–treatment interaction approach to transfer within training. , 1996 .

[75]  Beryl Hesketh,et al.  Dilemmas in training for transfer and retention , 1997 .

[76]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Self-regulation through goal setting , 1991 .

[77]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Cognitive reliability and error analysis method , 1998 .

[78]  B Hesketh,et al.  Learning from errors in a driving simulation: effects on driving skill and self-confidence , 2000, Ergonomics.