Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts

Online discussions provide opportunities for learners to engage in argumentative debate, but learners rarely formulate well-grounded arguments or benefit individually from participating in online discussions. Learners often do not explicitly warrant their arguments and fail to construct counterarguments (incomplete formal argumentation structure), which is hypothesized to impede individual knowledge acquisition. Computer-supported scripts have been found to support learners during online discussions. Such scripts can support specific discourse activities, such as the construction of single arguments, by supporting learners in explicitly warranting their claims or in constructing specific argumentation sequences, e.g., argument–counterargument sequences, during online discussions. Participation in argumentative discourse is seen to promote both knowledge on argumentation and domain-specific knowledge. However, there have been few empirical investigations regarding the extent to which computer-supported collaboration scripts can foster the formal quality of argumentation and thereby facilitate the individual acquisition of knowledge. One hundred and twenty (120) students of Educational Science participated in the study with a 2 × 2-factorial design (with vs. without script for the construction of single arguments and with vs. without script for the construction of argumentation sequences) and were randomly divided into groups of three. Results indicated that the collaboration scripts could improve the formal quality of single arguments and the formal quality of argumentation sequences in online discussions. Scripts also facilitated the acquisition of knowledge on argumentation, without affecting the acquisition of domain-specific knowledge.

[1]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design , 2002 .

[2]  David Gijbels,et al.  The relation between assessment practices and outcomes of studies: The case of problem-based learning , 2003 .

[3]  G. Salomon.  Distributed cognitions : psychological and educational considerations , 1997 .

[4]  Rachel Hertz-Lazarovits,et al.  Interaction in cooperative groups : the theoretical anatomy of group learning , 1992 .

[5]  Armin Weinberger,et al.  Scripts for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2003 .

[6]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning To Solve Problems. Technical Report No. 9. , 1987 .

[7]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Argumentation, Computer Support, and the Educational Context of Confronting Cognitions , 2003 .

[8]  Merrilee H. Salmon,et al.  Reasoning in Conversation , 1993 .

[9]  W. Doise.  The social development of the intellect , 1984 .

[10]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Group processes in the classroom. , 1996 .

[11]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Constructive Conflict in the Schools , 1994 .

[12]  D. Clements,et al.  Social-cognitive behaviors and higher-order thinking in educational computer environments , 1992 .

[13]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  The Social and Technological Dimensions of Scaffolding and Related Theoretical Concepts for Learning, Education, and Human Activity , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[14]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension : a construction-integration model , 1991 .

[15]  B. Weiner.  An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. , 1985, Psychological review.

[16]  D. Kuhn,et al.  Effects of Dyadic Interaction on Argumentive Reasoning , 1997 .

[17]  D. Kuhn.  THE SKILLS OF ARGUMENT , 2008, Education for Thinking.

[18]  C. Miller,et al.  A theory of argumentative understanding: Relationships among position preference, judgments of goodness, memory and reasoning , 1993 .

[19]  F. Fischer,et al.  Collaboration Scripts – A Conceptual Analysis , 2006 .

[20]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Blocking Learner Error States in a Training-Wheels System , 1984 .

[21]  D. Walton,et al.  Commitment In Dialogue , 1995 .

[22]  A. King.  Scripting Collaborative Learning Processes: A Cognitive Perspective , 2007 .

[23]  P. Coirier,et al.  Foundations of argumentative text processing , 2000 .

[24]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Supporting CSCL with automatic corpus analysis technology , 2005, CSCL.

[25]  Selma Leitão,et al.  The Potential of Argument in Knowledge Building , 2000, Human Development.

[26]  Peter Gerjets,et al.  Instructional design for effective and enjoyable computer-supported learning , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Matthew W. Keefer,et al.  Judging the Quality of Peer-Led Student Dialogues , 2000 .

[28]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  Analytic Frameworks for Assessing Dialogic Argumentation in Online Learning Environments , 2007 .

[29]  Gerard L. Hanley,et al.  Teaching Critical Thinking: Focusing on Metacognitive Skills and Problem Solving , 1995 .

[30]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments , 2003 .

[31]  B. Rosenshine,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching: A Review of the Research , 1994 .

[32]  Miika Marttunen,et al.  Assessing argumentation skills among finnish university students , 1994 .

[33]  R. Spiro,et al.  The Art of Multimedia and the State of Education@@@Cognition, Education, and Multimedia: Exploring Ideas in High Technology , 1992 .

[34]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  CSCL, Argumentation, and Deweyan Inquiry , 2003 .

[35]  B. Rosenshine,et al.  Teaching Students to Generate Questions: A Review of the Intervention Studies , 1996 .

[36]  R. Soden,et al.  Critical thinking in education: a review , 2000 .

[37]  P. Dillenbourg,et al.  Elaborating New Arguments Through a CSCL Script , 2003 .

[38]  M. Baker.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED ARGUMENTATIVE INTERACTIONS FOR THE CO-ELABORATION OF SCIENTIFIC NOTIONS , 2003 .

[39]  Iris Tabak,et al.  Synergy: A Complement to Emerging Patterns of Distributed Scaffolding , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[40]  Ronald R. Schmeck,et al.  Individual differences in cognition , 1983 .

[41]  Lisa D. Bendixen,et al.  Enhancing the Quality of On-Line Discussions , 2002 .

[42]  D. Perkins.  Person plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning , 1994 .

[43]  J. F. Voss,et al.  Who Reasons Well? Two Studies of Informal Reasoning Among Children of Different Grade, Ability, and Knowledge Levels , 1996 .

[44]  M. Segers,et al.  Effects of problem-based learning: a meta- analysis , 2003 .

[45]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment , 1997, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[46]  Gijsbert Erkens,et al.  Argumentation as Negotiation in Electronic Collaborative Writing , 2003 .

[47]  F. Fischer,et al.  A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[48]  S. Toulmin.  The uses of argument , 1960 .

[49]  P. Dillenbourg,et al.  Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? , 2002 .

[50]  A. King.  ASK to THINK-TEL WHY: A model of transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher level complex learning , 1997 .

[51]  Jean-Pierre Rossi,et al.  Text and text processing , 1991 .

[52]  Miika Marttunen.  Commenting on Written Arguments as a Part of Argumentation Skills — comparison between students engaged in traditional vs on‐line study , 1992 .

[53]  Frank Fischer,et al.  Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning : cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives , 2007 .

[54]  E. Cohen.  Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups , 1994 .

[55]  D. Walton,et al.  Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning , 1995 .

[56]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2007 .

[57]  James D. Slotta,et al.  Internal and external collaboration scripts in web-based science learning at schools , 2005, CSCL.

[58]  James F. Voss,et al.  Narrative Structure, Information Certainty, Emotional Content, and Gender as Factors in a Pseudo Jury Decision-Making Task , 2001 .

[59]  James F. Voss,et al.  The development of argumentive discourse skill , 2001 .

[60]  Aemilian Hron,et al.  Strukturierte Kooperation beim computerunterstützten kollaborativen Lernen , 1997 .

[61]  F. H. van Eemeren,et al.  A glance behind the scenes: The state of the art in the study of argumentation , 2003 .

[62]  F. Fischer,et al.  The Interplay of Internal and External Scripts , 2007 .

[63]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[64]  Hermann Astleitner.  Teaching Critical Thinking , 2002 .

[65]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Scripting Argumentative Knowledge Construction in Computer-Supported Learning Environments , 2007 .

[66]  Päivi Häkkinen,et al.  Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[67]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Facilitating Collaborative Knowledge Construction in Computer-Mediated Learning Environments with Cooperation Scripts , 2005 .

[68]  Deanna Kuhn,et al.  Arguing on the computer , 2005, CSCL.

[69]  Claire O'Malley,et al.  Computer Supported Collaborative Learning , 1995, NATO ASI Series.