EFFECTS OF FLOW REGULATION, HABITAT AREA AND ISOLATION ON THE MACROINVERTEBRATE FAUNA OF RAPIDS IN NORTH SWEDISH RIVERS

We sampled macroinvertebrates in 51 rapids in regulated and unregulated north Swedish rivers. Our objective was to quantify the effects on the invertebrate fauna of altered flow patterns, habitat area and isolation.  The remaining rapids in regulated north Swedish rivers have two types of flow regime: (a) Those with altered flow pattern, but unreduced flow, are characterized by low long-term variation and high day to day variation. Typically, the spring flood is strongly reduced, whereas winter flow is greatly increased in relation to the situation in unregulated streams. (b) Rapids from which a major part of the flow has been diverted usually show high seasonal and daily variation, although there are often long periods with constant flow within seasons.  The effects of altered flow patterns were examined using the following method. Predictive models were built for biotic responses at unregulated sites. These models did not include variables affected by regulation, such as flow magnitude and variability. The models were then used to make predictions for affected sites. The differences between observed and predicted numbers were used as a measure of the effect of regulation.  Sites with reduced flow had 0–30 species (mean=6) less than predicted, corresponding to a loss of 0–38% of predicted richness. The total abundance was 0–54% (mean=12%) less than predicted. Subdivision of the fauna into functional feeding groups showed that the abundances of collectors, grazers and predators, but not filter feeders and shredders,were negatively affected. For regulated sites,with no diversion of flow, significant losses were only recorded for the abundances of collectors and predators.  A subsequent analysis of the relationship between the effects and the regulation-related variables, which had been left out in the first models, indicated that the occurrence of large and rapid changes of discharge was the most important factor.  No effects on overall species richness of habitat size and isolation were found, suggesting that extinction and re-establishment of subpopulations are not prominent processes on the scale considered in this investigation.  Our data suggest that avoiding large and rapid flow changes can increase both the abundance and the diversity of vertebrates. Increasing the flow will decrease flow variability but will also expand the habitable area and thus the production of invertebrates. The best effect is expected at sites where a considerable proportion of the flow has been diverted.

[1]  S. Saltveit,et al.  Effect of a changed temperature regime on the benthos of a norwegian regulated river , 1994 .

[2]  R. J. Davidson,et al.  Recovery of benthic macroinvertebrate and epilithic communities following a large flood, in an unstable, braided, New Zealand river , 1988 .

[3]  J. Gore,et al.  Predictive Models of Benthic Macroinvertebrate Density for Use in Instream Flow Studies and Regulated Flow Management , 1981 .

[4]  A. Hildrew Patchiness, species interactions and disturbance in the stream benthos , 1994 .

[5]  Otto Moog,et al.  Quantification of daily peak hydropower effects on aquatic fauna and management to minimize environmental impacts , 1993 .

[6]  Ken D. Bovee,et al.  A guide to stream habitat analysis using the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. IFIP No. 12 , 1982 .

[7]  J. Irvine Effects of successive flow perturbations on stream invertebrates , 1985 .

[8]  Establishing the Quantity of Necessary Flow , 1988 .

[9]  R. J. Mackay,et al.  Colonization by lotic macroinvertebrates : a review of processes and patterns , 1992 .

[10]  Christopher W. Hickey,et al.  Magnitude of effects of substrate particle size, recent flooding, and catchment development on benthic invertebrates in 88 New Zealand rivers , 1990 .

[11]  K. Cummins,et al.  An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America , 1981 .

[12]  J. Stanford,et al.  Ecological Factors Controlling Stream Zoobenthos with Emphasis on Thermal Modification of Regulated Streams , 1979 .

[13]  G. Minshall,et al.  Application of Island Biogeographic Theory to Streams: Macroinvertebrate Recolonization of the Teton River, Idaho , 1983 .

[14]  Nancy B. Grimm,et al.  TEMPORAL SUCCESSION IN A DESERT STREAM ECOSYSTEM FOLLOWING FLASH FLOODING , 1982 .

[15]  J. Heltshe,et al.  Estimating species richness using the jackknife procedure. , 1983, Biometrics.

[16]  Á. Baltanás,et al.  On the use of some methods for the estimation of species richness , 1992 .

[17]  Stephen B. Weisberg,et al.  Enhancement of benthic macroinvertebrates by minimum flow from a hydroelectric dam , 1990 .

[18]  R. Peter Richards,et al.  Measures of Flow Variability and a New Flow-Based Classification of Great Lakes Tributaries , 1990 .

[19]  J. Gislason Aquatic Insect Abundance in a Regulated Stream under Fluctuating and Stable Diel Flow Patterns , 1985 .

[20]  D. Raffaelli,et al.  Aquatic Ecology: Scale, Pattern and Process. , 1995 .

[21]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  Implications of Streamflow Variability and Predictability for Lotic Community Structure: A Regional Analysis of Streamflow Patterns , 1989 .

[22]  C. Estes,et al.  Review and Analysis of Methods for Quantifying Instream Flow Requirements , 1986 .