Development and Evaluation of the Conceptual Inventory of Natural Selection

Natural selection as a mechanism of evolution is a central concept in biology; yet, most nonbiology-majors do not thoroughly understand the theory even after instruction. Many alternative conceptions on this topic have been identified, indicating that the job of the instructor is a difficult one. This article presents a new diagnostic test to assess students' understanding of natural selection. The test items are based on actual scientific studies of natural selection, whereas previous tests have employed hypothetical situations that were often misleading or oversimplified. The Conceptual Inventory of Natural Selection (CINS) is a 20-item multiple choice test that employs common alternative conceptions as distractors. An original 12-item version of the test was field-tested with 170 nonmajors in 6 classes and 43 biology majors in 1 class at 3 community colleges. The test scores of one subset of nonmajors (n ¼ 7) were compared with the students' performances in semistructured interviews. There was a positive correlation between the test scores and the interview scores. The current 20-item version of the CINS was field-tested with 206 students in a nonmajors' general biology course. The face validity, internal validity, reliability, and readability of the CINS are discussed. Results indicate that the CINS will be a valuable tool for instructors. 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 39: 952-978, 2002 Natural selection is the principal mechanism of evolution, and the theory of evolution is of great importance as a unifying theory in biology education according to the National Science Standards (National Research Council, 1996). Yet, natural selection is misunderstood by many students. The litany of alternative conceptions regarding natural selection and evolution is long (Mayr, 1982; Clough & Driver, 1986; Good, Trowbridge, Demastes, Wandersee, Hafner, & Cummins, 1992; Scharmann & Harris, 1992; Cummins, Demastes & Hafner, 1994). Some studies

[1]  N. Pierce.  Origin of Species , 1914, Nature.

[2]  S. Ralph Powers,et al.  National association for research in science teaching , 1931 .

[3]  D. Lack.  Evolution of the Galapagos Finches , 1940, Nature.

[4]  Wilson L. Taylor,et al.  “Cloze Procedure”: A New Tool for Measuring Readability , 1953 .

[5]  H. B. Kettlewell,et al.  Selection experiments on industrial melanism in the Lepidoptera , 1955, Heredity.

[6]  J. Horn.  A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis , 1965, Psychometrika.

[7]  M. Ghiselin.  On Semantic Pitfalls of Biological Adaptation , 1966, Philosophy of Science.

[8]  A. M. Lucas.  The Teaching of “Adaptation” , 1971 .

[9]  P. Tamir.  An Alternative Approach to The Construction of Multiple Choice Test Items , 1971 .

[10]  R. D. Linke,et al.  Misconceptions in physical science among non-science background students , 1978 .

[11]  R. D. Linke,et al.  Misconceptions in physical science among non-science background students: II , 1978 .

[12]  Students' Perceptions and Learning Styles Associated with the Concept of Evolution by Natural Selection , 1979 .

[13]  J. Endler.  NATURAL SELECTION ON COLOR PATTERNS IN POECILIA RETICULATA , 1980, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  Why Are There No Dinosaurs in Oklahoma , 1981 .

[15]  D. Culver.  Cave Life: Evolution and Ecology , 1982 .

[16]  E. Mayr.  The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance , 1983 .

[17]  M. Brumby,et al.  Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students , 1984 .

[18]  Children's understanding of inheritance , 1985 .

[19]  Rule‐governed approaches to physics: Conservation of mechanical energy , 1985 .

[20]  Elizabeth Engel Clough,et al.  How Secondary Students Interpret Instances of Biological Adaptation. , 1985 .

[21]  Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al.  The initial knowledge state of college physics students , 1985 .

[22]  Charles W. Anderson,et al.  Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution , 1986 .

[23]  T. Malthus.  An essay on the principle of population, as it affects the future improvement of society , 2006 .

[24]  Elizabeth Engel Clough,et al.  A Study of Consistency in the Use of Students' Conceptual Frameworks Across Different Task Contexts. , 1986 .

[25]  Anton E. Lawson,et al.  Formal Reasoning Ability and Misconceptions concerning Genetics and Natural Selection. , 1988 .

[26]  Ola Halldén,et al.  The evolution of the species: pupil perspectives and school perspectives , 1988 .

[27]  J. E. Cronin,et al.  Fact, Fancy, and Myth on Human Evolution , 1988, Current Anthropology.

[28]  D. Treagust.  Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science , 1988 .

[29]  G J Lautenschlager,et al.  A Comparison of Alternatives to Conducting Monte Carlo Analyses for Determining Parallel Analysis Criteria. , 1989, Multivariate behavioral research.

[30]  Richard P. Brown,et al.  Microgeographic variation in the colour pattern of the lizard Gallotia galloti within the island of Tenerife: distribution, pattern and hypothesis testing , 1989 .

[31]  J. Clement,et al.  Not all preconceptions are misconceptions: finding ‘anchoring conceptions’ for grounding instruction on students’ intuitions , 1989 .

[32]  Edgar D. Greene,et al.  The logic of university students' misunderstanding of natural selection , 1990 .

[33]  Lawrence C. Scharmann,et al.  Teaching evolution: Understanding and applying the nature of science , 1992 .

[34]  M. Jiménez-Aleixandre.  Thinking about theories or thinking with theories?: a classroom study with natural selection , 1992 .

[35]  R. Good.  Toward a Research Base for Evolution Education: Report of a National Conference...Proceedings of the Evolution Education Research Conference (Baton Rouge, Louisiana, December 4-5, 1992). , 1992 .

[36]  J. Weiner.  The Beak of the Finch: A Story of Evolution in Our Time , 1994 .

[37]  S. Gould.  The evolution of life on the earth. , 1994, Scientific American.

[38]  Ola Halldén,et al.  Intuitive ideas and scientific explanations as parts of students' developing understanding of biology: The case of evolution , 1994 .

[39]  A. Odom,et al.  Development and application of a two‐tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students' understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction , 1995 .

[40]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[41]  Elizabeth C. Doster,et al.  Hearts and minds in the science classroom: The education of a confirmed evolutionist , 1995 .

[42]  Murray S. Jensen,et al.  Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy , 1995 .

[43]  J. Lagowski.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[44]  J. Coyne.  Speciation in Action , 1996, Science.

[45]  María Pilar Jiménez Aleixandre.  Darwinian and Lamarckian Models Used by Students and Their Representation , 1996 .

[46]  Patsye Peebles,et al.  Patterns of Conceptual Change in Evolution , 1996 .

[47]  T. E. Dinero.  Scale development. , 1996, Journal of health & social policy.

[48]  C. Clarke,et al.  Parallel Rise and Fall of Melanic Peppered Moths in America and Britain , 1996 .

[49]  Kathleen M. Fisher,et al.  Comparison of student learning about diffusion and osmosis in constructivist and traditional classrooms , 1999 .

[50]  B. Grant,et al.  A phylogeny of Darwin's finches based on microsatellite DNA length variation , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  M. Condon.  Teaching about Evolution and the Nature of Science. Working Group on Teaching Evolution, National Academy of Sciences , 1999 .

[52]  Burt,et al.  Natural selection in the wild. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[53]  B. Grant,et al.  The allopatric phase of speciation: the sharp-beaked ground finch (Geospiza difficilis) on the Galápagos islands , 2000 .

[54]  Identifiers Jamaica,et al.  Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching , 2000 .

[55]  Fred Goldberg,et al.  The process of learning about static electricity and the role of the computer simulator , 2001 .

[56]  G. Turner.  The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation , 2001, Heredity.

[57]  B. Grant,et al.  A population founded by a single pair of individuals: establishment, expansion, and evolution , 2004, Genetica.

[58]  E. Glasersfeld.  Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching , 1989, Synthese.