The Beirut (Lebanon) area is exposed to a high seismic hazard because of its location close to major faults (Yammouneh, Roum, Hasbaya, Rachaya and Serghaya). The lack, until very recently, of enforcement of a building code together with the concentration of population, politic and economic activities, and the consequences of the civil war on buildings, transform this high hazard into a very high risk. It is therefore mandatory to assess the level of hazard and vulnerability, in view of shaping a policy to stabilize and eventually reduce the risk. Besides investigations to identify the local hazard (Brax, 2013), and considering the peculiarities of the Beirut building stock weakened by a long civil war, it has been decided to investigate whether the dynamic properties of Beirut buildings exhibit special characteristics as compared to other cities of the Mediterranean area. An ambient vibration measurement campaign has been carried out for a set of 303 buildings ranging from 2 to 33 stories. Most of them are reinforced concrete frames, 182 are located on rock and 121 on soft soils. The recordings are basically 15 minutes long and have been processed using the Geopsy software, to extract the natural frequencies and the corresponding damping values. A statistical analysis was then performed to identify correlations between these dynamic parameters and the geometrical characteristics of the buildings, and to compare them with existing relations. The results show that the key parameter controlling the fundamental frequency is the building height (or number of floors), while horizontal dimensions of the building have an only marginal influence. A comparison between the two groups of measurements in rocky and soft soil highlights slightly different, but statistically meaningful, correlations between the natural period T and number of floors N (T=N/23 for rock sites and N/18 for soft sites). A comparison between the measured frequencies and those computed from conventional formulas recommended in classical building codes exhibits very significant differences: the latter lead to an about 80% overestimation of the actually measured periods, while the measured damping exhibits a striking correlation with the frequency (the higher the building the lower the damping, with typical values around 1% for 2 Hz / 12 story buildings and around 5% for 6-8 Hz / 3-4 story buildings). These results are very consistent with conclusions drawn from similar measurements in other areas. Part of the large differences with building code recommendations may be due to the very 1 PhD student, ISTerre, Grenoble University, Grenoble, France, Notre Dame University NDU, Louaize, Lebanon, christelle.salameh@ujf-grenoble.fr 2 Eng, IRD, ISTerre, Grenoble University, Grenoble, France, armand.mariscal@ird.fr 3 Professor and Chair, Notre Dame University NDU, Louaize, Lebanon, jharb@ndu.edu.lb 4 PhD, IFSTTAR,ISTerre, Grenoble University, Grenoble, France, pierre-yves.bard@ujf-grenoble.fr 5 PhD, IRD, ISTerre, Grenoble University, Grenoble, France, bertrand.guillier@ird.fr 6 PhD, IRD, ISTerre, Grenoble University, Grenoble, France, cecile.cornou@ujf-grenoble.fr 7 PhD, CNRS, ISTerre, Grenoble University, Grenoble, France, cvoisin@ujf-grenoble.fr
[1]
Jean-Luc Chatelain,et al.
Establishing Empirical Period Formula for RC Buildings in Lima, Peru: Evidence for the Impact of Both the 1974 Lima Earthquake and the Application of the Peruvian Seismic Code on High‐Rise Buildings
,
2014
.
[2]
Mohammed Naboussi Farsi.
Identification des structures de génie civil à partir de leurs réponses vibratoires : vulnérabilité du bati existant
,
1996
.
[3]
C. Voisin,et al.
Imaging Heterogeneity Of Soil By Means Of Geophysical And Geotechnical Investigation : In The Alluvial Plain Of Beirut
,
2012
.
[4]
Clotaire Michel,et al.
Vulnérabilité Sismique de l'échelle du bâtiment à celle de la ville - Apport des techniques expérimentales in situ - Application à Grenoble
,
2008
.
[5]
Claude Boutin,et al.
In Situ Experiment and Modelling of RC-Structure Using Ambient Vibration and Timoshenko Beam
,
2006
.
[6]
Carlos Sousa Oliveira,et al.
Fundamental periods of vibration of RC buildings in Portugal from in-situ experimental and numerical techniques
,
2010
.
[7]
John A. Blume,et al.
A machine for setting structures and ground into forced vibration
,
1935
.
[8]
A. G. Brady,et al.
Natural Periods of Vibration of Buildings
,
1963
.
[9]
Ezio Faccioli,et al.
A STUDY OF SITE EFFECTS AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF AN INSTRUMENTED BUILDING IN MEXICO CITY
,
1998
.
[10]
K. Khair.
Geomorphology and seismicity of the Roum Fault as one of the active branches of the Dead Sea Fault System in Lebanon
,
2001
.
[11]
M. Celebi.
Comparison of damping in buildings under low-amplitude and strong motions
,
1996
.
[12]
Naoki Satake,et al.
Evaluation of vibration properties of high-rise steel buildings using data of vibration tests and earthquake observations
,
1996
.
[13]
Pierre-Yves Bard,et al.
Estimation des périodes propres de bâtiments et vulnérabilité du bâti existant dans l'agglomération de Grenoble
,
2004
.
[14]
Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.
Time and amplitude dependent response of structures
,
1973
.
[15]
Philippe Guéguen,et al.
CityShark: A User-friendly Instrument Dedicated to Ambient Noise (Microtremor) Recording for Site and Building Response Studies
,
2000
.
[16]
Clotaire Michel,et al.
Comparison between seismic vulnerability models and experimental dynamic properties of existing buildings in France
,
2010
.
[17]
Young-Soo Chun,et al.
Experimental formula for the fundamental period of RC buildings with shear-wall dominant systems
,
2000
.
[18]
Rui Pinho,et al.
Revisiting Eurocode 8 formulae for periods of vibration and their employment in linear seismic analysis
,
2009
.