Knowledge Integration in Science Teaching: Analysing Teachers' Knowledge Development

This paper tests the utility of a new sociocognitive frame for analysing the development of teachers' knowledge – the knowledge integration perspective (Linn, Eylon, & Davis, in press; Linn & Hsi, 2000). In doing so, the paper describes one prospective elementary teacher's developing knowledge and highlights its complexity. The prospective teacher demonstrates relatively well-integrated science subject matter knowledge, but she makes some problematic links to lessons and develops some instructional representations that show where she needs to distinguish between different scientific ideas. She also, however, links science concepts to appropriate real-world experiences, indicating that she has nascent useful pedagogical content knowledge. The paper discusses what teacher educators can learn about their learners from this analysis, argues for the utility of the knowledge integration perspective for conducting similar analyses, provides ideas to help science teacher educators apply the perspective easily as they teach their students, and points to areas ripe for future research.

[1]  Emily H. van Zee,et al.  Using pedagogical inquiries as a basis for learning to teach: Prospective teachers' reflections upon positive science learning experiences , 2001 .

[2]  C. Lewis,et al.  A Lesson Is Like a Swiftly Flowing River: How Research Lessons Improve Japanese Education , 1999 .

[3]  Kara Dawson,et al.  Teacher Inquiry , 2006 .

[4]  Richard S. Prawat,et al.  Teaching Mathematics for Understanding: Discussing Case Studies of Four Fifth-Grade Teachers , 1992, The Elementary School Journal.

[5]  Ralph T. Putnam,et al.  What Do New Views of Knowledge and Thinking Have to Say About Research on Teacher Learning? , 2000 .

[6]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  Inquiry in Project-Based Science Classrooms: Initial Attempts by Middle School Students , 1998 .

[7]  Onno De Jong,et al.  The Development of Preservice Chemistry Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2002 .

[8]  Content and Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Elementary Science Teacher Educators: Knowing our Students , 2000 .

[9]  Brian S. White,et al.  Intermediate Causal Models: A Missing Link for Successful Science Education? , 2019, Advances in Instructional Psychology.

[10]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[11]  E. Davis,et al.  Subject Matter Knowledge and Goal Preferences Among Preservice Elementary Science Teachers , 2001 .

[12]  Mary M. Kennedy,et al.  Education reform and subject matter knowledge , 1998 .

[13]  A. F.,et al.  Light , 1889, Nature.

[14]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The scaffolded knowledge integration framework , 1995 .

[15]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[16]  Deborah Loewenberg Ball,et al.  Knowledge and reasoning in mathematical pedagogy : examining What prospective teachers bring to teacher education. (Volumes I and II) , 1988 .

[17]  Charles W. Anderson,et al.  WHY STAYING ONE CHAPTER AHEAD DOESN'T REALLY WORK: SUBJECT-SPECIFIC PEDAGOGY , 1989 .

[18]  Jeffrey John Loughran,et al.  Professional Development in Residence: Developing reflection on science teaching and learning , 1997 .

[19]  J. Roschelle,et al.  Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition , 1994 .

[20]  J. H. Driel,et al.  Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge , 1998 .

[21]  L. Anderson,et al.  Integrating Learner and Learning Concerns: Prospective Elementary Science Teachers' Paths and Progress. , 2000 .

[22]  Jennifer I. Berne,et al.  Chapter 6 : Teacher Learning and the Acquisition of Professional Knowledge: An Examination of Research on Contemporary Professlonal Development , 1999 .

[23]  L. Shulman.  Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[24]  Janice M. Morse,et al.  Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation , 1996 .

[25]  M. Linn,et al.  Computers, Teachers, Peers: Science Learning Partners , 2000 .

[26]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Designing for Knowledge Integration: The Impact of Instructional Time , 2003 .

[27]  Deborah C. Smith,et al.  The Construction of Subject Matter Knowledge in Primary Science Teaching. , 1989 .

[28]  H. Simon,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1986 .

[29]  Anthony Ralston,et al.  Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics , 1999 .

[30]  J. J. Loughran,et al.  Effective Reflective Practice , 2002 .

[31]  S. Feldman.  The Teaching Gap. , 2004 .

[32]  E. Davis.  Prompting Middle School Science Students for Productive Reflection: Generic and Directed Prompts , 2003 .

[33]  J. Bruer.  Schools for Thought: A Science of Learning in the Classroom , 1993 .

[34]  Barbara B. Levin,et al.  Who learns what from cases and how? : the research base for teaching and learning with cases , 1999 .

[35]  Loretta L. Jones,et al.  The Subject Matter Knowledge of Preservice Science Teachers , 1998 .

[36]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[37]  Hyman Bass,et al.  Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. , 2000 .

[38]  R. Linn,et al.  Qualitative methods in research on teaching , 1985 .

[39]  M. Linn,et al.  Beyond Fourth-Grade Science: Why Do U.S. and Japanese Students Diverge? , 2000 .

[40]  M. Linn,et al.  Teaching thermodynamics to middle school students: What are appropriate cognitive demands? , 1991 .

[41]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Learning to Use Parentheses and Quotes in LISP , 1995, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[42]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Case Study Research in Education : A Qualitative Approach , 1991 .

[43]  Ken Appleton,et al.  How Do Beginning Primary School Teachers Cope with Science? Toward an Understanding of Science Teaching Practice , 2003 .

[44]  D. Treagust,et al.  In search of explanatory frameworks: an analysis of Richard Feynman's lecture 'Atoms in motion' , 2000 .

[45]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Knowledge in pieces : An evolving framework for understanding knowing and learning , 1988 .

[46]  Barbara B. Levin.  Case Studies of Teacher Development: An In-Depth Look at How Thinking About Pedagogy Develops Over Time , 2002 .

[47]  N. Hatton,et al.  Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation , 1995 .

[48]  P. Grossman.  The Making of a Teacher: Teacher Knowledge and Teacher Education , 1990 .

[49]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Influence of Guided Cycles of Planning, Teaching, and Reflection on Prospective Elementary Teachers' Science Content Representations , 2000 .

[50]  J. Northfield.  Teacher Educators and the Practice of Science Teacher Education , 1998 .

[51]  J. Minstrell,et al.  Teaching Science for Understanding , 1989 .

[52]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  The nature and development of preservice science teachers' conceptions of subject matter and pedagogy , 1994 .

[53]  J. Clement.  Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics , 1982 .

[54]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Assessment and Measurement of Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 1999 .

[55]  D. Lortie,et al.  Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study , 1976 .

[56]  Kenneth M. Zeichner,et al.  Action research and reflective teaching in preservice teacher education: A case study from the United States , 1991 .

[57]  Diane Holt-Reynolds,et al.  Good Readers, Good Teachers? Subject Matter Expertise as a Challenge in Learning to Teach. , 1999 .

[58]  Elizabeth Anna Davis.  Scaffolding students' reflection for science learning , 1998 .

[59]  Children's concepts: Tools for transforming science teachers' knowledge , 1999 .

[60]  R. Driver,et al.  Children's Ideas in Science , 1985 .

[61]  J. Krajcik,et al.  Nature, Sources, and Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Science Teaching , 1999 .

[62]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Preservice biology teachers' knowledge structures as a function of professional teacher education: A year‐long assessment , 1993 .