Tracer experiments in fractured rocks: Matrix diffusion and the validity of models

Several published tracer tests are reexamined using the single fracture dispersion model (SFDM), i.e., a solution to the transport equation in which fractured rock is represented by a single fracture and the tracer is allowed to diffuse into the matrix. The model has three fitting parameters, i.e., the mean time of flow, dispersivity, and a diffusion parameter which combines such physical parameters as matrix porosity, coefficient of matrix diffusion, and adjusted fracture aperture. The model is easily calibrated yielding as good, or better, fits as did the models applied in original works, which were based on an assumption of negligible matrix diffusion and were characterized by larger numbers of fitting parameters. The SFDM better describes the short-term transport in investigated systems and/or their parameters than models applied so far. Validation of the model was obtained by showing that the values of its physical parameters either agree with those known from other methods or are within expected ranges. Another validation was achieved for tests performed in the same pair of wells with two tracers characterized by distinctly different coefficients of molecular diffusion. In spite of distinct differences in the shapes of the experimental curves, the SFDM yielded the same values of the fracture aperture, matrix porosity, and intrinsic dispersivity. The ratio of the diffusion coefficients in the matrix was close to that known from the diffusion coefficients in free water.

[1]  A. Zuber,et al.  On the physical meaning of the dispersion equation and its solutions for different initial and boundary conditions , 1978 .

[2]  K. H. Coats,et al.  Dead-End Pore Volume and Dispersion in Porous Media , 1964 .

[3]  A. Zuber,et al.  Comments on "Flux-Averaged and Volume-Averaged Concentrations in Continuum Approaches to Solute Transport" by J. C. Parker , 1986 .

[4]  G. Marsily,et al.  Modeling fracture flow with a stochastic discrete fracture network: calibration and validation: 1. The flow model , 1990 .

[5]  Ivars Neretnieks,et al.  Diffusion in the Matrix of Granitic Rock: Field Test in the Stripa Mine , 1990 .

[6]  Ivars Neretnieks,et al.  Diffusion in the rock matrix: An important factor in radionuclide retardation? , 1980 .

[7]  Ivars Neretnieks,et al.  Porosities and Diffusivities of Some Nonsorbing Species in Crystalline Rocks , 1986 .

[8]  Jacques Villermaux,et al.  Modèle représentatif de la distribution des temps de séjour dans un réacteur semi-infini à dispersion axiale avec zones stagnantes. Application à l'écoulement ruisselant dans des colonnes d'anneaux Raschig , 1969 .

[9]  Emil O. Frind,et al.  Contaminant transport in fractured porous media: Analytical solutions for a system of parallel fractures , 1982 .

[10]  O. Levenspiel Chemical Reaction Engineering , 1972 .

[11]  J. Baudracco,et al.  Effets de l'alteration sur quelques proprietes mecaniques du granite du sidobre (France) , 1982 .

[12]  C Louis,et al.  DETERMINATION OF IN-SITU HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS IN JOINTED ROCK , 1970 .

[13]  K. Raven,et al.  Interpretation of field tracer tests of a single fracture using a transient solute storage model , 1988 .

[14]  Piotr Maloszewski,et al.  On the theory of tracer experiments in fissured rocks with a porous matrix , 1985 .

[15]  Piotr Maloszewski,et al.  Mathematical modeling of tracer behavior in short‐term experiments in fissured rocks , 1990 .

[16]  Stephen E. Silliman,et al.  An interpretation of the difference between aperture estimates derived from hydraulic and tracer tests in a single fracture , 1989 .

[17]  A. Zuber,et al.  On the calibration and validation of mathematical models for the interpretation of tracer experiments in groundwater , 1992 .

[18]  David Mautner Himmelblau,et al.  Process Analysis and Simulation. Deterministic Systems , 1968 .

[19]  P. Saffman,et al.  Dispersion in flow through a network of capillaries , 1959 .

[20]  P. Maloszewski,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Radioactive Tracer Migration in Water Flowing through Saturated Porous Media , 1988 .

[21]  John D. Bredehoeft,et al.  Ground-water models cannot be validated , 1992 .

[22]  W. A. Beetem,et al.  Porosity and Dispersion Constant Calculations for a Fractured Carbonate Aquifer Using the Two Well Tracer Method , 1971 .

[23]  Emmanuel Ledoux,et al.  Modeling fracture flow with a stochastic discrete fracture network: Calibration and validation: 2. The transport model , 1990 .

[24]  K. Raven,et al.  A Field Example of Measuring Hydrodynamic Dispersion in a Single Fracture , 1985 .

[25]  Ivars Neretnieks,et al.  A note on fracture flow dispersion mechanisms in the ground , 1983 .

[26]  I. Neretnieks,et al.  Tracer movement in a single fissure in granitic rock: Some experimental results and their interpretation , 1982 .

[27]  A. Shapiro,et al.  Assessing the validity of the channel model of fracture aperture under field conditions , 1989 .