Learning new physics from a machine
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Benjamin Philip Nachman,et al. CWoLa Hunting: Extending the Bump Hunt with Machine Learning , 2018 .
[2] B. Nachman,et al. Anomaly Detection for Resonant New Physics with Machine Learning. , 2018, Physical review letters.
[3] Gilles Louppe,et al. Mining gold from implicit models to improve likelihood-free inference , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[4] Gilles Louppe,et al. Constraining Effective Field Theories with Machine Learning. , 2018, Physical review letters.
[5] Gilles Louppe,et al. A guide to constraining effective field theories with machine learning , 2018, Physical Review D.
[6] C. Frye,et al. JUNIPR: a framework for unsupervised machine learning in particle physics , 2018, The European Physical Journal C.
[7] M. Reece,et al. Opening the black box of neural nets: case studies in stop/top discrimination , 2018, 1804.09278.
[8] M. Schwartz,et al. Jet charge and machine learning , 2018, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[9] Vijayan K. Asari,et al. The History Began from AlexNet: A Comprehensive Survey on Deep Learning Approaches , 2018, ArXiv.
[10] D. Shih,et al. Pulling out all the tops with computer vision and deep learning , 2018, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[11] Qiang Du,et al. Deep ReLU networks lessen the curse of dimensionality , 2017 .
[12] Hadrien Montanelli,et al. New error bounds for deep networks using sparse grids. , 2017 .
[13] Michela Paganini,et al. CaloGAN: Simulating 3D High Energy Particle Showers in Multi-Layer Electromagnetic Calorimeters with Generative Adversarial Networks , 2017, ArXiv.
[14] Michela Paganini,et al. Controlling Physical Attributes in GAN-Accelerated Simulation of Electromagnetic Calorimeters , 2017, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
[15] A. Larkoski,et al. Novel jet observables from machine learning , 2017, 1710.01305.
[16] B. Ostdiek,et al. What is the Machine Learning , 2017, 1709.10106.
[17] B. Nachman,et al. Jet substructure at the Large Hadron Collider: A review of recent advances in theory and machine learning , 2017, Physics Reports.
[18] Gregor Kasieczka,et al. Deep-learned Top Tagging with a Lorentz Layer , 2017, SciPost Physics.
[19] Tatsumi Nitta,et al. Identification of Hadronically-Decaying W Boson Top Quarks Using High-Level Features as Input to Boosted Decision Trees and Deep Neural Networks in ATLAS at #sqrt{s} = 13 TeV , 2017 .
[20] M. Buckley,et al. Digging deeper for new physics in the LHC data , 2017, 1707.05783.
[21] M. Freytsis,et al. (Machine) learning to do more with less , 2017, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[22] Zihao Jiang,et al. Identification of Jets Containing b-Hadrons with Recurrent Neural Networks at the ATLAS Experiment , 2017 .
[23] Benjamin Nachman,et al. Accelerating Science with Generative Adversarial Networks: An Application to 3D Particle Showers in Multilayer Calorimeters. , 2017, Physical review letters.
[24] A. Larkoski,et al. How much information is in a jet? , 2017, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[25] Pierre Baldi,et al. Decorrelated jet substructure tagging using adversarial neural networks , 2017, Physical Review D.
[26] Kyunghyun Cho,et al. QCD-aware recursive neural networks for jet physics , 2017, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[27] G. Kasieczka,et al. Deep-learning top taggers or the end of QCD? , 2017, 1701.08784.
[28] Lorenzo Rosasco,et al. Why and when can deep-but not shallow-networks avoid the curse of dimensionality: A review , 2016, International Journal of Automation and Computing.
[29] Luke de Oliveira,et al. Boosted Jet Tagging with Jet-Images and Deep Neural Networks , 2016 .
[30] R. Srikant,et al. Why Deep Neural Networks for Function Approximation? , 2016, ICLR.
[31] Luke de Oliveira,et al. Image Processing, Computer Vision, and Deep Learning: new approaches to the analysis and physics interpretation of LHC events , 2016, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
[32] E. Dawe,et al. Parton Shower Uncertainties in Jet Substructure Analyses with Deep Neural Networks , 2016, 1609.00607.
[33] P. Baldi,et al. Jet flavor classification in high-energy physics with deep neural networks , 2016, 1607.08633.
[34] P. Baldi,et al. Jet Substructure Classification in High-Energy Physics with Deep Neural Networks , 2016, 1603.09349.
[35] Pierre Baldi,et al. Parameterized neural networks for high-energy physics , 2016, The European Physical Journal C.
[36] Luke de Oliveira,et al. Jet-images — deep learning edition , 2015, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[37] Song Han,et al. Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Network with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Coding , 2015, ICLR.
[38] Gilles Louppe,et al. Approximating Likelihood Ratios with Calibrated Discriminative Classifiers , 2015, 1506.02169.
[39] J. Latorre,et al. Parton distributions for the LHC run II , 2015, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[40] Leandro Giordano Almeida,et al. Playing tag with ANN: boosted top identification with pattern recognition , 2015, 1501.05968.
[41] Francis R. Bach,et al. Breaking the Curse of Dimensionality with Convex Neural Networks , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[42] J. Latorre,et al. Parton distributions for the LHC run II , 2014, 1410.8849.
[43] K. Cranmer,et al. Erratum to: Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics , 2013 .
[44] Tapani Raiko,et al. Semi-supervised anomaly detection – towards model-independent searches of new physics , 2011, 1112.3329.
[45] Georgios Choudalakis,et al. On hypothesis testing, trials factor, hypertests and the BumpHunter , 2011, 1101.0390.
[46] K. Cranmer,et al. Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics , 2010, 1007.1727.
[47] A. Meyer. MUSiC—An Automated Scan for Deviations between Data and Monte Carlo Simulation , 2010 .
[48] H. Collaboration,et al. A General Search for New Phenomena at HERA , 2009, 0901.0507.
[49] E. al.,et al. Global search for new physics with 2.0 fb(-1) at CDF , 2008, 0809.3781.
[50] D. Whiteson,et al. Model-independent and quasi-model-independent search for new physics at CDF , 2008 .
[51] C. Collaboration,et al. Model-Independent and Quasi-Model-Independent Search for New Physics at CDF , 2007, 0712.1311.
[52] Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.
[53] H. Collaboration. A general search for new phenomena in ep scattering at HERA , 2004, hep-ex/0408044.
[54] Wolfgang A. Rolke,et al. Limits and confidence intervals in the presence of nuisance parameters , 2004, physics/0403059.
[55] M. Wessels,et al. General search for new phenomena in ep scattering at HERA , 2004, 0705.3721.
[56] L. Garrido,et al. Neural network parametrization of deep inelastic structure functions , 2002, hep-ph/0204232.
[57] Alan D. Martin,et al. Review of Particle Physics , 2000, Physical Review D.
[58] D0 Collaboration. Quasi-model-independent search for new physics at large transverse momentum , 2000, hep-ex/0011067.
[59] B. Knuteson. Sleuth: A quasi-model-independent search strategy for new physics , 2000, hep-ex/0105027.
[60] W. Jason Owen,et al. Statistical Data Analysis , 2000, Technometrics.
[61] D. Signorini,et al. Neural networks , 1995, The Lancet.
[62] Vladik Kreinovich,et al. Arbitrary nonlinearity is sufficient to represent all functions by neural networks: A theorem , 1991, Neural Networks.
[63] Kurt Hornik,et al. Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks , 1991, Neural Networks.
[64] George Cybenko,et al. Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function , 1989, Math. Control. Signals Syst..
[65] Kurt Hornik,et al. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators , 1989, Neural Networks.
[66] A. Wald. Tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters when the number of observations is large , 1943 .
[67] S. S. Wilks. The Large-Sample Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio for Testing Composite Hypotheses , 1938 .
[68] E.E. Pissaloux,et al. Image Processing , 1994, Proceedings. Second Euromicro Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Processing.
[69] E. S. Pearson,et al. On the Problem of the Most Efficient Tests of Statistical Hypotheses , 1933 .
[70] Albert Y. Kim,et al. Hypothesis Testing , 2019, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology.
[71] Review of Multibody Charm Analyses. , 2022 .
[72] and as an in , 2022 .