Regional Statistical and Precipitation–Runoff Modelling for Ecological Applications: Prediction of Hourly Streamflow in Regulated Rivers and Ungauged Basins

Prediction of natural streamflow in regulated rivers for derivation of ecologically relevant streamflow metrics (ERSFMs) and prediction in ungauged basins (PUB) are important in management of water resources. However, specific studies on comparison of methods for predicting hourly flow regime relevant to ecological study in regulated (hydropeaking) rivers are rare in literature. Therefore, using catchments in mid Norway, we performed comparative evaluation of prediction of hourly streamflow series and flow duration curves (FDCs) in ungauged basins. We developed a regional regression model based on relationships among streamflow percentiles and drainage areas and performed a regional calibration of a streamflow recession based precipitation–runoff (P–R) model. A leave one out cross-validation procedure was used to evaluate the regional models. The results indicate that the regional regression model with transferring of streamflow information based on the nearest neighbour performed better than both transferring optimal parameters from local calibration and regional parameter sets corresponding to maximum regional weighted average Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency of the P–R model (NSEMRWA). We also evaluated the models based on prediction of some environmental indices: the daily range, daily standard deviation, flashiness, maximum ramping rate, number of rise and falls and daily flow changes. However, both modelling strategies predicted hourly streamflow indices well and appeared stable over most indices while the largest differences occurred in the rise and fall counts. The models were further applied for prediction of the natural streamflow time series at Sokna hydropeaking plant. The observed hydrograph exhibits continuous sudden fluctuations while the predicted natural flow hydrograph exhibits smooth pattern. The within a year FDCs for observed flow exhibits sharp transitions from high to low flows. There is clear differences between the environmental indices obtained for the observed and the modelled data series, with the general observation that the NSEMRWA computing a smaller variability than the regression model. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins – Part 1: Runoff-hydrograph studies , 2013 .

[2]  Rafael Muñoz-Mas,et al.  HABITAT SUITABILITY MODELLING AT MESOHABITAT SCALE AND EFFECTS OF DAM OPERATION ON THE ENDANGERED JúCAR NASE, PARACHONDROSTOMA ARRIGONIS (RIVER CABRIEL, SPAIN) , 2012 .

[3]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[4]  David P. Braun,et al.  How much water does a river need , 1997 .

[5]  Thorsten Wagener,et al.  Parameter estimation and regionalization for continuous rainfall-runoff models including uncertainty , 2006 .

[6]  William J. Wolfe,et al.  Ecological limit functions relating fish community response to hydrologic departures of the ecological flow regime in the Tennessee River basin, United States , 2014 .

[7]  J. Kirchner.  Catchments as simple dynamical systems: Catchment characterization, rainfall‐runoff modeling, and doing hydrology backward , 2009 .

[8]  C. Comoglio,et al.  DEFINING MINIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL FLOWS AT REGIONAL SCALE: APPLICATION OF MESOSCALE HABITAT MODELS AND CATCHMENTS CLASSIFICATION , 2012 .

[9]  Charles H. Luce,et al.  Macroscale hydrologic modeling of ecologically relevant flow metrics , 2010 .

[10]  Sjur Kolberg,et al.  Updating of snow depletion curve with remote sensing data , 2003 .

[11]  R. Mcmanamay,et al.  Characterizing Sub‐Daily Flow Regimes: Implications of Hydrologic Resolution on Ecohydrology Studies , 2015 .

[12]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Smooth regional estimation of low-flow indices: physiographical space based interpolation and top-kriging , 2011 .

[13]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards , 2007 .

[14]  R. Tharme.  A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers , 2003 .

[15]  Nicholas E. Jones,et al.  THE DUAL NATURE OF HYDROPEAKING RIVERS: IS ECOPEAKING POSSIBLE? , 2014 .

[16]  J. Stoddard,et al.  Using Relative Risk to Compare the Effects of Aquatic Stressors at a Regional Scale , 2006, Environmental management.

[17]  Y. Mohamoud,et al.  Prediction of daily flow duration curves and streamflow for ungauged catchments using regional flow duration curves , 2008 .

[18]  R. Norris,et al.  Predicting the natural flow regime: models for assessing hydrological alteration in streams , 2009 .

[19]  W. Wolfe,et al.  Modelling ecological flow regime: an example from the Tennessee and Cumberland River basins , 2012 .

[20]  David P. Braun,et al.  A Method for Assessing Hydrologic Alteration within Ecosystems , 1996 .

[21]  Brian Richter,et al.  Application of the Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration Software in Environmental Flow Setting 1 , 2007 .

[22]  Daren M. Carlisle,et al.  Alteration of streamflow magnitudes and potential ecological consequences: a multiregional assessment , 2011 .

[23]  N. Schofield,et al.  Issues in environmental water allocation--an Australian perspective. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[24]  Julian Friedrich Sauterleute,et al.  A computational tool for the characterisation of rapid fluctuations in flow and stage in rivers caused by hydropeaking , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[25]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  IAHS Decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB), 2003–2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences , 2003 .

[26]  Rory Nathan,et al.  Identification of homogeneous regions for the purposes of regionalisation , 1990 .

[27]  William J. Wolfe,et al.  PREDICTING ECOLOGICAL FLOW REGIME AT UNGAGED SITES: A COMPARISON OF METHODS , 2013 .

[28]  Pao-Shan Yu,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis of Regional Flow Duration Curves , 2002 .

[29]  Xinan Yin,et al.  OPTIMIZING ENVIRONMENTAL FLOWS BELOW DAMS , 2012 .

[30]  William J. Wolfe,et al.  Model Calibration Criteria for Estimating Ecological Flow Characteristics , 2015 .

[31]  C. Priestley,et al.  On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters , 1972 .

[32]  Paulin Coulibaly,et al.  Streamflow Prediction in Ungauged Basins: Review of Regionalization Methods , 2013 .

[33]  K. Engeland,et al.  A Comparison of Low Flow Estimates in Ungauged Catchments Using Regional Regression and the HBV-Model , 2009 .

[34]  R. Naiman,et al.  The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[35]  K. Alfredsen,et al.  A simple procedure for the assessment of hydropeaking flow alterations applied to several European streams , 2015, Aquatic Sciences.

[36]  Knut Alfredsen,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF AN INFLOW‐CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW REGIME FOR A NORWEGIAN RIVER , 2010 .

[37]  J. McDonnell,et al.  A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—a review , 2013 .

[38]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[39]  Brian P. Bledsoe,et al.  Predicting streamflow regime metrics for ungauged streamsin Colorado, Washington, and Oregon , 2006 .

[40]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[41]  J. Olden,et al.  Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes , 2003 .

[42]  J. Meyer,et al.  Flow regime alterations under changing climate in two river basins: implications for freshwater ecosystems , 2005 .

[43]  Erwin Zehe,et al.  A review of regionalisation for continuous streamflow simulation , 2011 .

[44]  Jonathan G. Kennen,et al.  Use of an integrated flow model to estimate ecologically relevant hydrologic characteristics at stream biomonitoring sites , 2008 .

[45]  Nick Marsh,et al.  Classification of natural flow regimes in Australia to support environmental flow management , 2010 .

[46]  D. Peters,et al.  Evaluating the ability of a hydrologic model to replicate hydro‐ecologically relevant indicators , 2014 .