Effect of storage time on the viscoelastic properties of elastomeric impression materials.

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate creep and viscoelastic properties of dental impression materials after different storage times. METHODS Six commercially available impression materials (one polyether and five silicones) were tested after being stored for 30 min to 2 weeks under both static and dynamic testing. Shear and Young's moduli, dynamic viscosity, loss tangent and other viscoelastic parameters were calculated. Four of the materials were tested 1 h after setting under creep for three hours and recovery was recorder for 50 h. RESULTS The tested materials showed differences among them, while storage time had significant influence on their properties. Young's modulus E ranged from 1.81 to 12.99 MPa with the polyether material being the stiffest. All of the materials showed linear viscoelastic behavior exhibiting permanent deformation after 50h of creep recovery. CONCLUSION As storage time affects the materials' properties, pouring time should be limited in the first 48 h after impression.

[1]  R. Lakes,et al.  Creep of Amalgam at Low Stresses , 1987, Journal of dental research.

[2]  R. G. Craig Restorative dental materials , 1971 .

[3]  J. Berg,et al.  Wettability, imbibition, and mass change of disinfected low-viscosity impression materials. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  A. J. Goldberg,et al.  Viscoelastic Properties of Silicone, Polysulfide, and Polyether Impression Materials , 1974, Journal of dentistry research.

[5]  D Brown,et al.  An update on elastomeric impression materials , 1981, British Dental Journal.

[6]  R. Lakes,et al.  The effect of temperature on the viscoelastic properties of nano-hybrid composites. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[7]  Sergio Adán-Plaza,et al.  Temperature effects on the rheological properties of current polyether and polysiloxane impression materials during setting. , 2003, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  K. Inoue,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of elastomeric impression materials. I. A method of measuring shear modulus and rigidity during setting. , 1978, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[9]  J. McCabe,et al.  Surface detail reproduction of elastomeric impression materials related to rheological properties. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[10]  S. Hondrum Changes in properties of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[11]  M. Litaker,et al.  Tensile elastic recovery of elastomeric impression materials. , 2008, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  J. McCabe,et al.  Elastomeric impression materials. The measurement of some properties relevant to clinical practice , 1980, British Dental Journal.

[13]  R. Lakes Size effects and micromechanics of a porous solid , 1983 .

[14]  E Harrington,et al.  Rigidity of elastomeric impression materials. , 1989, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[15]  J. McCabe,et al.  Rheological Properties of Elastomeric Impression Materials Before and During Setting , 1998, Journal of dental research.

[16]  M. Braden,et al.  Visco-elastic properties of dental elastomeric impression materials. , 1986, Biomaterials.

[17]  J. McCabe,et al.  Rheological Properties of Elastomers during Setting , 1989, Journal of dental research.