Undermining the Baldwin expediting effect: does phenotypic plasticity accelerate evolution?

The claim that phenotypic plasticity speeds up evolution towards a target phenotype is a recent incarnation of the Baldwin effect. To differentiate this theory from earlier interpretations of Baldwin's ideas, we name it the Baldwin expediting effect. Models that demonstrate this effect assume an extreme fitness scenario which bestows high fitness upon a single optimal phenotype and treats all other phenotypes as equal. In two modeling frameworks, we demonstrate that the effects of plasticity on the rate of evolution are highly dependent on the fitness function and population starting conditions. We argue that phenotypic plasticity does not universally facilitate evolution. Furthermore, in cases where the Baldwin expediting effect occurs, it is not necessarily correlated with increased fitness and therefore is not sufficient to explain the evolutionary success of plasticity.

[1]  A. Weismann,et al.  The Germ-Plasm: A Theory of Heredity , 1981 .

[2]  J. Baldwin.  A New Factor in Evolution , 1896, The American Naturalist.

[3]  H. Osborn.  OYTOGENIC AND PHYLOGENIC VARIATION. , 1896, Science.

[4]  C L Morgan,et al.  ON MODIFICATION AND VARIATION. , 1896, Science.

[5]  S. Wright.  Evolution in mendelian populations , 1931 .

[6]  C. Waddington.  Canalization of Development and the Inheritance of Acquired Characters , 1942, Nature.

[7]  I. Schmalhausen.  Factors of evolution : the theory of stabilizing selection , 1946 .

[8]  Gregory Bateson,et al.  THE ROLE OF SOMATIC CHANGE IN EVOLUTION , 1963 .

[9]  R. Levins.  Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. (MPB-2) , 1968 .

[10]  M. Slatkin,et al.  Niche Width in a Fluctuating Environment-Density Independent Model , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[11]  M. Feldman,et al.  Evolution of continuous variation: direct approach through joint distribution of genotypes and phenotypes. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  R. Lande,et al.  Genetic Variation and Phenotypic Evolution During Allopatric Speciation , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[13]  C. Harley.  Learning the evolutionarily stable strategy. , 1981, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  How Learning Can Guide Evolution , 1996, Complex Syst..

[15]  Ron Meir,et al.  The Effect of Learning on the Evolution of Asexual Populations , 1990, Complex Syst..

[16]  Richard K. Belew,et al.  Evolution, Learning, and Culture: Computational Metaphors for Adaptive Algorithms , 1990, Complex Syst..

[17]  David H. Ackley,et al.  Interactions between learning and evolution , 1991 .

[18]  N. Moran.  The Evolutionary Maintenance of Alternative Phenotypes , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[19]  L. Wolpert.  The evolutionary origin of development: cycles, patterning, privilege and continuity. , 1994, Development (Cambridge, England). Supplement.

[20]  R. Anderson,et al.  Learning and evolution: a quantitative genetics approach. , 1995, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  M. Whitlock.  The Red Queen Beats the Jack-Of-All-Trades: The Limitations on the Evolution of Phenotypic Plasticity and Niche Breadth , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[22]  Giles Mayley,et al.  Landscapes, Learning Costs, and Genetic Assimilation , 1996, Evolutionary Computation.

[23]  M. Whitlock.  FOUNDER EFFECTS AND PEAK SHIFTS WITHOUT GENETIC DRIFT: ADAPTIVE PEAK SHIFTS OCCUR EASILY WHEN ENVIRONMENTS FLUCTUATE SLIGHTLY , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Handbook of Evolutionary Computation , 1997 .

[25]  K. Weiss,et al.  Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction Norm Perspective , 1999 .

[26]  L. Ancel,et al.  A quantitative model of the Simpson-Baldwin Effect. , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  Larry Bull,et al.  On the Baldwin Effect , 1999, Artificial Life.

[28]  W. Fontana,et al.  Plasticity, evolvability, and modularity in RNA. , 2000, The Journal of experimental zoology.