Green Manufacturing: An Evaluation of Environmentally Sustainable Manufacturing Practices and Their Impact on Competitive Outcomes

Increasingly, stakeholders are asking or requiring organizations to be more environmentally responsible with respect to their products and processes; reasons include regulatory requirements, product stewardship, public image, and potential competitive advantages. This paper presents an exploratory study of the relationships between specific environmentally sustainable manufacturing practices, and specific competitive outcomes in an environmentally important but under-researched industry, the U.S. commercial carpet industry. In general, empirical research on the impact of environmental practices on organizational outcomes is inconclusive, partly due to limitations of earlier studies. This paper addresses some of these limitations, and surveys the entire U.S. commercial carpet industry; respondents represent 84 of the market. Findings suggest that environmentally sustainable manufacturing practices may be positively associated with competitive outcomes. In particular, different types of environmentally sustainable manufacturing practices (e.g., pollution prevention, product stewardship) are associated with different competitive outcomes (e.g., manufacturing cost, product quality). These specific findings can be helpful to engineering and operations managers as they respond to environmental and competitive demands.

[1]  Paul K. Freeman Integrating environmental risk into corporate strategy , 1994 .

[2]  Chad Nehrt,et al.  TIMING AND INTENSITY EFFECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTMENTS , 1996 .

[3]  Renato J. Orsato Competitive environmental strategies: when does it pay to be green? , 2006 .

[4]  John Seidler,et al.  On Using Informants: A Technique for Collecting Quantitative Data and Controlling Measurement Error in Organization Analysis , 1974 .

[5]  P. Bansal Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development , 2005 .

[6]  R. Klassen,et al.  The Impact of Environmental Technologies on Manufacturing Performance , 1999 .

[7]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Green and Competitive : Ending the Stalemate , 1996 .

[8]  Hema A. Krishnan,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Scope of a Firm's Enterprise Strategy , 1994 .

[9]  Nazim U. Ahmed,et al.  Perceptions of Environmental Consciousness in U.S. Small Businesses: An Empirical Study , 2003 .

[10]  M. Sadiq Sohail,et al.  Sustaining Competitive Advantage in the Global Petrochemical Industry: A Saudi Arabian Perspective , 2006 .

[11]  Shirley Dex,et al.  JR 旅客販売総合システム(マルス)における運用及び管理について , 1991 .

[12]  Thomas J. Dean,et al.  Stepping Towards Sustainable Business: An Evaluation of Waste Minimization Practices in US Manufacturing , 2000, Interfaces.

[13]  Lucie K. Ozanne,et al.  Challenges of the “green imperative”: a natural resource-based approach to the environmental orientation–business performance relationship , 2005 .

[14]  M Williams,et al.  Managing Quality , 2018 .

[15]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  First‐mover advantages , 1988 .

[16]  Robert J. Firenze,et al.  Organizational performance and environmental consciousness: an empirical study , 1998 .

[17]  S. Hart A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[18]  D. Dillman Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[19]  Steven A. Melnyk,et al.  THE GAP BETWEEN THEORY AND PRACTICE , 2006 .

[20]  Paul Shrivastava,et al.  Environmental technologies and competitive advantage , 1995 .

[21]  Petra Christmann Effects of “Best Practices” of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets , 2000 .

[22]  A. Campbell,et al.  Corporate strategy: The quest for parenting advantage , 1995 .

[23]  R. Calantone,et al.  Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance , 2003 .

[24]  Mark Cordano,et al.  Exploring Individual and Institutional Drivers of Proactive Environmentalism in the US Wine Industry , 2005 .