Kinematic Signatures of Telic and Atelic Events in ASL Predicates

This article presents an experimental investigation of kinematics of verb sign production in American Sign Language (ASL) using motion capture data. The results confirm that event structure differences in the meaning of the verbs are reflected in the kinematic formation: for example, in the telic verbs (THROW, HIT), the end-point of the event is marked in the verb sign movement by significantly greater deceleration, as compared to atelic verbs (SWIM, TRAVEL). This end-point marker is highly robust regardless of position of the verb in the sentence (medial vs. final), although other prominent kinematic measures, including sign duration and peak speed of dominant hand motion within the sign, are affected by prosodic processes such as Phrase Final Lengthening. The study provides the first kinematic confirmation that event structure is expressed in movement profiles of ASL verbs, up to now only supported by apparent perceptual distinctions. The findings raise further questions about the psychology of event representation both in human languages and in the human mind.

[1]  Henk J. Verkuyl,et al.  On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects , 1972 .

[2]  Terence Parsons,et al.  Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics , 1990 .

[3]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Event Segmentation , 2007, Current directions in psychological science.

[4]  E. Gibson,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Language and Cognitive Processes Acoustic Correlates of Information Structure Acoustic Correlates of Information Structure , 2022 .

[5]  H. Verkuyl A Theory of Aspectuality: The Interaction between Temporal and Atemporal Structure , 1996 .

[6]  Susan D. Fischer,et al.  Some unfinished thoughts on FINISH , 1999 .

[7]  Ronnie B Wilbur,et al.  Productive reduplication in a fundamentally monosyllabic language. , 2009, Language sciences.

[8]  Gillian Ramchand,et al.  Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax , 2008 .

[9]  Z. Vendler Linguistics in Philosophy , 1967 .

[10]  K. Green Sign Boundaries in American Sign Language , 2013 .

[11]  C. Mauk,et al.  Undershoot in two modalities: evidence from fast speech and fast signing , 2003 .

[12]  R. Wilbur Effects of Varying Rate of Signing on ASL Manual Signs and Nonmanual Markers , 2009, Language and speech.

[13]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  The syntax of event structure , 1991, Cognition.

[14]  R. Wilbur,et al.  A reanalysis of reduplication in American Sign Language , 2005 .

[15]  F. Grosjean,et al.  Analyse contrastive des variables temporelles de l’anglais et du français: vitesse de parole et variables composantes, phénomènes d’hésitation , 1975 .

[16]  Scott K. Liddell An investigation into the syntactic structure of American sign language , 1977 .

[17]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Word Meaning and Montague Grammar , 1979 .

[18]  Harlan Lane,et al.  Pauses and syntax in American sign language , 1977, Cognition.

[19]  Diane Brentari,et al.  A Prosodic Model of Sign Language Phonology , 1999 .

[20]  김두식,et al.  English Verb Classes and Alternations , 2006 .

[21]  Carlota S. Smith,et al.  The Parameter of Aspect , 1991 .

[22]  Jodie A. Baird,et al.  Infants parse dynamic action. , 2001, Child development.

[23]  E. Klima The signs of language , 1979 .

[24]  M. Krifka The Origins of Telicity , 1998 .

[25]  Barbara B. Levin,et al.  English verb classes and alternations , 1993 .

[26]  Evguenia Malaia,et al.  ERP evidence for telicity effects on syntactic processing in garden-path sentences , 2009, Brain and Language.

[27]  R. Wilbur,et al.  Stress in A SL: Empirical Evidence and Linguistic I ssues , 1999, Language and speech.

[28]  Scott K. Liddell,et al.  American Sign Language: The Phonological Base , 2013 .

[29]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Human Brain Activity Time-Locked to Narrative Event Boundaries , 2007, Psychological science.

[30]  Ronnie B. Wilbur,et al.  COMPLEX PREDICATES INVOLVING EVENTS, TIME AND ASPECT: IS THIS WHY SIGN LANGUAGES LOOK SO SIMILAR? , 2007 .

[31]  Diane Brentari,et al.  Sensitivity to Visual Prosodic Cues in Signers and Nonsigners , 2011, Language and speech.

[32]  R. Jackendoff Parts and boundaries , 1991, Cognition.

[33]  J. Zacks,et al.  Using movement and intentions to understand human activity , 2009, Cognition.

[34]  Erin Leigh O'Bryan Event structure in language comprehension , 2003 .