Understanding recovery from object substitution masking

When we look at a scene, we are conscious of only a small fraction of the available visual information at any given point in time. This raises profound questions regarding how information is selected, when awareness occurs, and the nature of the mechanisms underlying these processes. One tool that may be used to probe these issues is object-substitution masking (OSM). In OSM, a sparse, temporally-trailing four dot mask can interfere with target perception, even though the target and mask have different contours and do not spatially overlap (Enns & Di Lollo, 1997). Here, we investigate the mechanisms underlying the recently discovered recovery from OSM observed with prolonged mask exposure (Goodhew, Visser, Lipp, & Dux, 2011). In three experiments, we demonstrate that recovery is unaffected by mask offset, and that prolonged physical exposure of the mask is not necessary for recovery. These findings confirm that recovery is not due to: (a) an offset transient impairing the visibility of other stimuli that are nearby in space and time, or (b) mask adaptation or temporal object-individuation cues resulting from prolonged mask exposure. Instead, our results confirm recovery as a high-level visual-cognitive phenomenon, which is inherently tied to target-processing time. This reveals the prolonged iterative temporal dynamics of conscious object perception.

[1]  Troy A W Visser,et al.  Competing for consciousness: prolonged mask exposure reduces object substitution masking. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  David E. Irwin,et al.  On the Relations among Different Measures of Visible and Informational Persistence , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  B. Bridgeman Common-onset masking simulated with a distributed-code model , 2008, Advances in cognitive psychology.

[6]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  Distributed sensory coding applied to simulations of iconic storage and metacontrast , 1978 .

[7]  B G Breitmeyer,et al.  Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing. , 1976, Psychological review.

[8]  N. Block Begging the question against phenomenal consciousness , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[9]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Iconic memory and visible persistence , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  Alejandro Lleras,et al.  On the role of object representations in substitution masking. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  D. Broadbent Perception and communication , 1958 .

[14]  Troy A. W. Visser,et al.  Delayed reentrant processing impairs visual awareness: An object substitution masking study , 2010 .

[15]  W. A. Phillips On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory , 1974 .

[16]  C. Koch,et al.  Consciousness and neuroscience. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Magnetic stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex dissociates fragile visual short-term memory from visual working memory , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Sabine Kastner,et al.  Visual attention as a multilevel selection process , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[19]  R. Marois,et al.  The attentional blink: A review of data and theory , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[20]  A. Mack,et al.  Metacontrast Masking and Attention , 1999 .

[21]  H Pashler,et al.  Familiarity and visual change detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  Jonathan I. Flombaum,et al.  A temporal same-object advantage in the tunnel effect: facilitated change detection for persisting objects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  J H Hogben,et al.  Perceptual integration and perceptual segregation of brief visual stimuli. , 1974, Vision research.

[24]  B. Bridgeman Metacontrast and lateral inhibition. , 1971, Psychological review.

[25]  N. Block On a confusion about a function of consciousness , 1995, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[26]  M. Livingstone,et al.  Neuronal correlates of visibility and invisibility in the primate visual system , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  C. Koch The quest for consciousness : a neurobiological approach , 2004 .

[28]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Object substitution without reentry , 2002 .

[29]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[30]  D. Robinson,et al.  Visual disinhibition with binocular and interocular presentations. , 1968, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[31]  C. Moore,et al.  When the target becomes the mask: using apparent motion to isolate the object-level component of object substitution masking. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  M. Alpern Metacontrast; historical introduction. , 1952, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[33]  G. Francis,et al.  Cortical dynamics of lateral inhibition: metacontrast masking. , 1997, Psychological review.

[34]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Temporal integration between visual images and visual percepts. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  W. Singer,et al.  Reciprocal lateral inhibition of on- and off-center neurones in the lateral geniculate body of the cat , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  B Bridgeman,et al.  Distributed sensory coding applied to simulations of iconic storage and metacontrast. , 1978, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[37]  Brian J. Scholl Objects and attention , 2002 .

[38]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[39]  Frouke Hermens,et al.  Comment on "Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes" (Di Lollo, Enns, & Rensink, 2000). , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[40]  W Singer,et al.  Inhibitory interaction between X and Y units in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus. , 1973, Brain research.

[41]  D. Kahneman Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[42]  U. Neisser Cognitive Psychology: Classic Edition , 1967 .

[43]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Are There Multiple Visual Short-Term Memory Stores? , 2008, PloS one.

[44]  K. Jellinger Visual Masking – Time Slices through Conscious and Unconscious Vision, 2nd edn. , 2009 .

[45]  J. Lachter,et al.  Metacontrast masking functions: A question of speed? , 1999 .

[46]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Visual attention modulates metacontrast masking , 1995, Nature.

[47]  D N Robinson,et al.  Disinhibition of Visually Masked Stimuli , 1966, Science.

[48]  B G Breitmeyer,et al.  Metacontrast investigations of sustained-transient channel inhibitory interactions. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  Rachel S. Sussman,et al.  Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[51]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[52]  B G Breitmeyer,et al.  Backward masking by pattern stimulus offset. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  G Francis,et al.  Quantitative theories of metacontrast masking. , 2000, Psychological review.

[54]  N Weisstein,et al.  A Rashevsky-Landahl neural net: simulation of metacontrast. , 1968, Psychological review.

[55]  W N Dember,et al.  Recovery of Masked Visual Targets by Inhibition of the Masking Stimulus , 1967, Science.

[56]  V. Lollo Temporal integration in visual memory. , 1980 .

[57]  L. Benjamin,et al.  A History of Psychology: Original Sources and Contemporary Research , 1987 .

[58]  J. Enns,et al.  Object Substitution: A New Form of Masking in Unattended Visual Locations , 1997 .