Multi-variable mathematical models for the air-cathode microbial fuel cell system

Abstract This research adopted the version control system into the model construction for the single chamber air-cathode microbial fuel cell (MFC) system, to understand the interrelation of biological, chemical, and electrochemical reactions. The anodic steady state model was used to consider the chemical species diffusion and electric migration influence to the MFC performance. In the cathodic steady state model, the mass transport and reactions in a multi-layer, abiotic cathode and multi-bacteria cathode biofilm were simulated. Transport of hydroxide was assumed for cathodic pH change. This assumption is an alternative to the typical notion of proton consumption during oxygen reduction to explain elevated cathode pH. The cathodic steady state model provided the power density and polarization curve performance results that can be compared to an experimental MFC system. Another aspect considered was the relative contributions of platinum catalyst and microbes on the cathode to the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). Simulation results showed that the biocatalyst in a cathode that includes a Pt/C catalyst likely plays a minor role in ORR, contributing up to 8% of the total power calculated by the models.

[1]  Fang Zhang,et al.  Reference and counter electrode positions affect electrochemical characterization of bioanodes in different bioelectrochemical systems , 2014, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[2]  B. Rittmann,et al.  Evaluating the impacts of migration in the biofilm anode using the model PCBIOFILM , 2010 .

[3]  Bruce E Logan,et al.  Long-term cathode performance and the microbial communities that develop in microbial fuel cells fed different fermentation endproducts. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[4]  Baikun Li,et al.  Effects of gas diffusion layer (GDL) and micro porous layer (MPL) on cathode performance in microbia , 2011 .

[5]  Hong Liu,et al.  Electricity generation using an air-cathode single chamber microbial fuel cell in the presence and absence of a proton exchange membrane. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Bruce E. Logan,et al.  Microbial Fuel Cells , 2006 .

[7]  B. Kirby.  Micro- and nanoscale fluid mechanics : transport in microfluidic devices , 2010 .

[8]  P. Heitjans,et al.  Diffusion in Condensed Matter: Methods, Materials, Models , 2012 .

[9]  W Gujer,et al.  A multispecies biofilm model , 1986, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[10]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  A computational model for biofilm-based microbial fuel cells. , 2007, Water research.

[11]  G H Dibdin,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Biofilms , 1997, Advances in dental research.

[12]  Shungui Zhou,et al.  In situ investigation of cathode and local biofilm microenvironments reveals important roles of OH- and oxygen transport in microbial fuel cells. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Arun Mittal,et al.  Biological Wastewater Treatment , 2019, Practical Waste water Treatment.

[14]  B. Logan,et al.  Production of Electricity from Proteins Using a Microbial Fuel Cell , 2006, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[15]  Mark C M van Loosdrecht,et al.  A general description of detachment for multidimensional modelling of biofilms. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[16]  Stefano Freguia,et al.  Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Shungui Zhou,et al.  Polypyrrole/carbon black composite as a novel oxygen reduction catalyst for microbial fuel cells , 2010 .

[18]  H. Nguyen,et al.  Redox and pH microenvironments within Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 biofilms reveal an electron transfer mechanism. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Zhiyong Ren,et al.  Characterization of microbial fuel cells at microbially and electrochemically meaningful time scales. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Bruce E. Logan,et al.  Increased performance of single-chamber microbial fuel cells using an improved cathode structure , 2006 .

[21]  V. S. Vaidhyanathan,et al.  Transport phenomena , 2005, Experientia.

[22]  Matthew M. Mench,et al.  Fuel Cell Engines , 2008 .

[23]  Dongwon Ki,et al.  Importance of OH(-) transport from cathodes in microbial fuel cells. , 2012, ChemSusChem.

[24]  Bruce E Rittmann,et al.  Conduction‐based modeling of the biofilm anode of a microbial fuel cell , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[25]  Hong Liu,et al.  Production of electricity during wastewater treatment using a single chamber microbial fuel cell. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  Yingzhi Zeng,et al.  Modelling and simulation of two-chamber microbial fuel cell , 2010 .

[27]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[28]  H. Rismani-Yazdi,et al.  Cathodic limitations in microbial fuel cells: An overview , 2008 .

[29]  Bruce E Rittmann,et al.  Proton transport inside the biofilm limits electrical current generation by anode‐respiring bacteria , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[30]  Miss A.O. Penney.  (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.