The Goldbeter-Koshland Switch in the First-Order Region and Its Response to Dynamic Disorder

In their classical work (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1981, 78:6840–6844), Goldbeter and Koshland mathematically analyzed a reversible covalent modification system which is highly sensitive to the concentration of effectors. Its signal-response curve appears sigmoidal, constituting a biochemical switch. However, the switch behavior only emerges in the ‘zero-order region’, i.e. when the signal molecule concentration is much lower than that of the substrate it modifies. In this work we showed that the switching behavior can also occur under comparable concentrations of signals and substrates, provided that the signal molecules catalyze the modification reaction in cooperation. We also studied the effect of dynamic disorders on the proposed biochemical switch, in which the enzymatic reaction rates, instead of constant, appear as stochastic functions of time. We showed that the system is robust to dynamic disorder at bulk concentration. But if the dynamic disorder is quasi-static, large fluctuations of the switch response behavior may be observed at low concentrations. Such fluctuation is relevant to many biological functions. It can be reduced by either increasing the conformation interconversion rate of the protein, or correlating the enzymatic reaction rates in the network.

[1]  Hong Qian,et al.  Temporal cooperativity and sensitivity amplification in biological signal transduction. , 2008, Biochemistry.

[2]  Hong Qian,et al.  Phosphorylation energy hypothesis: open chemical systems and their biological functions. , 2007, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[3]  Adam P Arkin,et al.  Deviant effects in molecular reaction pathways , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  An optimal number of molecules for signal amplification and discrimination in a chemical cascade. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[5]  Jeffrey W. Smith,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2022 .

[6]  Katherine C. Chen,et al.  Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.

[7]  X. Xie,et al.  Two-dimensional reaction free energy surfaces of catalytic reaction: effects of protein conformational dynamics on enzyme catalysis. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[8]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[9]  H. Qian.  Equations for stochastic macromolecular mechanics of single proteins: Equilibrium fluctuations, transient kinetics, and nonequilibrium steady-state , 2000, physics/0007017.

[10]  C Frieden,et al.  Slow transitions and hysteretic behavior in enzymes. , 1979, Annual review of biochemistry.

[11]  Hong Qian,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity amplification in signal transduction , 2003, Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.

[12]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C. The art of scientific computing , 1987 .

[13]  D. Koshland,et al.  An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  P. Swain,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. , 1991, Science.

[16]  Jin Wang,et al.  Funneled Landscape Leads to Robustness of Cell Networks: Yeast Cell Cycle , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[17]  Jianhua Xing,et al.  From continuum Fokker-Planck models to discrete kinetic models. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Frank McCormick,et al.  The GTPase superfamily: a conserved switch for diverse cell functions , 1990, Nature.

[19]  Robert Zwanzig,et al.  Rate processes with dynamical disorder , 1990 .

[20]  Frank Moss,et al.  What is biological physics , 1997 .

[21]  M. Thattai,et al.  Attenuation of noise in ultrasensitive signaling cascades. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[22]  P. Reimann.  Brownian motors: noisy transport far from equilibrium , 2000, cond-mat/0010237.

[23]  Robert Zwanzig,et al.  Dynamical disorder: Passage through a fluctuating bottleneck , 1992 .

[24]  C. Rao,et al.  Control, exploitation and tolerance of intracellular noise , 2002, Nature.

[25]  B. Kholodenko.  Cell-signalling dynamics in time and space , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[26]  P. B. Chock,et al.  Superiority of interconvertible enzyme cascades in metabolic regulation: analysis of monocyclic systems. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[28]  M. Ehrenberg,et al.  Stochastic focusing: fluctuation-enhanced sensitivity of intracellular regulation. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Jianhua Xing,et al.  Protein fluctuations and breakdown of time-scale separation in rate theories. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  Jianhua Xing.  Nonequilibrium dynamic mechanism for allosteric effect. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[31]  P. R. ten Wolde,et al.  Signal detection, modularity, and the correlation between extrinsic and intrinsic noise in biochemical networks. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[32]  Andrea Ciliberto,et al.  Antagonism and bistability in protein interaction networks. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[33]  Wei Min,et al.  Single-molecule Michaelis-Menten equations. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[34]  G. Oster,et al.  The physics of molecular motors. , 2001, Accounts of chemical research.

[35]  Guobin Luo,et al.  Fluctuating enzymes: lessons from single-molecule studies. , 2005, Accounts of chemical research.

[36]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  X. Xie,et al.  Observation of a power-law memory kernel for fluctuations within a single protein molecule. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[38]  P. B. Chock,et al.  Superiority of interconvertible enzyme cascades in metabolite regulation: analysis of multicyclic systems. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Antoine M. van Oijen,et al.  Ever-fluctuating single enzyme molecules: Michaelis-Menten equation revisited , 2006, Nature chemical biology.

[40]  Bier,et al.  Fluctuation driven ratchets: Molecular motors. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[41]  A. Cornish-Bowden,et al.  Co-operative and allosteric enzymes: 20 years on. , 1987, European journal of biochemistry.

[42]  K. Fujimoto,et al.  Noisy signal amplification in ultrasensitive signal transduction. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  J. Levine,et al.  Intrinsic fluctuations, robustness, and tunability in signaling cycles. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[44]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic amplification and signaling in enzymatic futile cycles through noise-induced bistability with oscillations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  H Frauenfelder,et al.  Dynamics of ligand binding to myoglobin. , 1975, Biochemistry.

[46]  M. Magnasco,et al.  Forced thermal ratchets. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[47]  Martin Karplus,et al.  Aspects of Protein Reaction Dynamics: Deviations from Simple Behavior , 2000 .

[48]  Rajan P Kulkarni,et al.  Tunability and Noise Dependence in Differentiation Dynamics , 2007, Science.