Rapid Interactions between Lexical Semantic and Word Form Analysis during Word Recognition in Context: Evidence from ERPs

We used ERPs to investigate the time course of interactions between lexical semantic and sublexical visual word form processing during word recognition. Participants read sentence-embedded pseudowords that orthographically resembled a contextually supported real word (e.g., “She measured the flour so she could bake a ceke…”) or did not (e.g., “She measured the flour so she could bake a tont…”) along with nonword consonant strings (e.g., “She measured the flour so she could bake a srdt…”). Pseudowords that resembled a contextually supported real word (“ceke”) elicited an enhanced positivity at 130 msec (P130), relative to real words (e.g., “She measured the flour so she could bake a cake…”). Pseudowords that did not resemble a plausible real word (“tont”) enhanced the N170 component, as did nonword consonant strings (“srdt”). The effect pattern shows that the visual word recognition system is, perhaps, counterintuitively, more rapidly sensitive to minor than to flagrant deviations from contextually predicted inputs. The findings are consistent with rapid interactions between lexical and sublexical representations during word recognition, in which rapid lexical access of a contextually supported word (CAKE) provides top–down excitation of form features (“cake”), highlighting the anomaly of an unexpected word “ceke.”

[1]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[2]  M. Tovée,et al.  Processing speed in the cerebral cortex and the neurophysiology of visual masking , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  J. Pernier,et al.  ERP Manifestations of Processing Printed Words at Different Psycholinguistic Levels: Time Course and Scalp Distribution , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  I. staff.  Front end , 2002 .

[6]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[7]  L. Aravind,et al.  Integration of Word Meaning and World Knowledge in Language Comprehension , 2022 .

[8]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The visual word form area: a prelexical representation of visual words in the fusiform gyrus , 2002, Neuroreport.

[10]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Early semantic context integration and lexical access as revealed by event-related brain potentials , 2007, Biological Psychology.

[11]  Michael Grosvald,et al.  Lexical access in American Sign Language: An ERP investigation of effects of semantics and phonology , 2012, Brain Research.

[12]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data , 2006, NeuroImage.

[13]  Thomas A. Farmer,et al.  Early Occipital Sensitivity to Syntactic Category Is Based on Form Typicality , 2010, Psychological science.

[14]  M. Sigman,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.9 No.7 July 2005 The neural code for written words: a proposal , 2022 .

[15]  Heinz Wimmer,et al.  When does the brain register deviances from standard word spellings?--An ERP study. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Distinct time courses of word and context comprehension in the left temporal cortex. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  M. Pickering,et al.  An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[18]  K. Rayner,et al.  Measuring word recognition in reading: eye movements and event-related potentials , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  Nancy Ide,et al.  The American National Corpus , 2004 .

[20]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Determinants and mechanisms of attentional modulation of neural processing. , 2001, Frontiers in Bioscience.

[21]  Katherine A. DeLong,et al.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Suzanne Dikker,et al.  Before the N400: Effects of lexical–semantic violations in visual cortex , 2011, Brain and Language.

[23]  V. Lamme,et al.  The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[24]  Mariano Sigman,et al.  Hierarchical Coding of Letter Strings in the Ventral Stream: Dissecting the Inner Organization of the Visual Word-Form System , 2007, Neuron.

[25]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  Dissociating N400 Effects of Prediction from Association in Single-word Contexts , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Effects of word length and frequency on the human event-related potential , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[27]  R. O’Reilly.  Six principles for biologically based computational models of cortical cognition , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Watching the Word Go by: On the Time-course of Component Processes in Visual Word Recognition , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[29]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[30]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood: An Event-Related Potential Study of Lexical Relationships and Prediction in Context. , 2009, Journal of memory and language.

[31]  C. Schroeder,et al.  A spatiotemporal profile of visual system activation revealed by current source density analysis in the awake macaque. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  Peter Indefrey,et al.  Monitoring in language perception: Electrophysiological and hemodynamic responses to spelling violations , 2011, NeuroImage.

[33]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  H. Rabagliati,et al.  Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex , 2009, Cognition.

[35]  J. Grainger,et al.  ERP Evidence for Ultra-Fast Semantic Processing in the Picture–Word Interference Paradigm , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[36]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Masked repetition and translation priming in second language learners: a window on the time-course of form and meaning activation using erps. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[37]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[38]  L. Pylkkänen,et al.  Neuromagnetic Evidence for the Timing of Lexical Activation: An MEG Component Sensitive to Phonotactic Probability but Not to Neighborhood Density , 2002, Brain and Language.

[39]  M. Posner,et al.  Establishing a time‐line of word recognition: evidence from eye movements and event‐related potentials , 1998, Neuroreport.

[40]  Cathy J. Price,et al.  Top-down modulation of ventral occipito-temporal responses during visual word recognition , 2011, NeuroImage.

[41]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Neural correlates of second-language word learning: minimal instruction produces rapid change , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  H. Semlitsch,et al.  A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[43]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  The Speed of Orthographic Processing during Lexical Decision: Electrophysiological Evidence for Independent Coding of Letter Identity and Letter Position in Visual Word Recognition , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  J. Moake,et al.  This article has been cited by other articles , 2003 .

[45]  J. Grainger,et al.  An Electrophysiological Study of the Effects of Orthographic Neighborhood Size on Printed Word Perception , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[47]  T. Allison,et al.  Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe , 1994, Nature.

[48]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Event-Related Potentials Reveal Rapid Verification of Predicted Visual Input , 2009, PloS one.

[49]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Dynamics of letter string perception in the human occipitotemporal cortex. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[50]  P. Holcomb.  Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[51]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  Fast, visual specialization for reading in English revealed by the topography of the N170 ERP response , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[52]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Long-range neural synchronization supports fast and efficient reading: EEG correlates of processing expected words in sentences , 2013, NeuroImage.

[53]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[54]  Jana Straková,et al.  Concurrent effects of lexical status and letter-rotation during early stage visual word recognition: Evidence from ERPs , 2012, Brain Research.

[55]  David Huepe,et al.  What event-related potentials (ERPs) bring to social neuroscience? , 2012, Social neuroscience.

[56]  Shimon Ullman,et al.  Image interpretation by a single bottom-up top-down cycle , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  Hartmut Fitz,et al.  Getting real about Semantic Illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension , 2012, Brain Research.

[58]  G. Stone,et al.  Perception Is a Two-Way Street: Feedforward and Feedback Phonology in Visual Word Recognition ☆ , 1997 .

[59]  S. Sereno,et al.  Context Effects in Word Recognition , 2003, Psychological science.

[60]  H. Kolk,et al.  Monitoring in language perception: The effect of misspellings of words in highly constrained sentences , 2006, Brain Research.

[61]  T. Poggio,et al.  Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[62]  Donna Coch,et al.  Word and pseudoword superiority effects reflected in the ERP waveform , 2010, Brain Research.

[63]  H. Ferguson,et al.  Galvanic vestibular stimulation modulates the electrophysiological response during face processing , 2012, Visual Neuroscience.

[64]  Jelena Mirkovic,et al.  Incrementality and Prediction in Human Sentence Processing , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[65]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. , 2004, Psychological review.

[66]  L. Pylkkänen,et al.  Tracking the time course of word recognition with MEG , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[67]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.

[68]  Alec Marantz,et al.  Lexical access in early stages of visual word processing: A single-trial correlational MEG study of heteronym recognition , 2009, Brain and Language.

[69]  M. Tovée.  Neuronal Processing: How fast is the speed of thought? , 1994, Current Biology.