An innovative teaching method to increase engagement in the classroom: A case study in science and engineering

This Evidence-based practice paper describes a learning process developed and used in several STEM courses. Learning is a process unique to each individual and can be accomplished by watching, reading, doing, experiencing, repetition and even teaching. Learning according to [1] is a two-step process where the first step is to receive information and the second is to process. This study is an active learning method that combines these two steps in a repetitive process that encourages engagement and collaboration in the classroom. Memory related research has identified and confirmed the power of repetition on the recall ability. Repetition has a profound impact on the event related brain potential eliciting a longer recall period and has been reported to speed up the learning process [2,3,4]. In addition, paired learning combined with paired testing has been proven to enhance learning more than it would in paired learning combined with individual testing [5]. This paper discusses a pedagogy that combines the above mentioned theories. This pedagogy aims to maximize learning in within a short time frame. Students learn while creating questions and answers to these questions, preparing for the quiz, taking the quiz and finally grading the quiz. The students work with a partner or in a group throughout the process of the quiz. The paper also discusses the modifications done to accommodate for the change in a classroom size. It also gives the feedback gathered from the students while implementing this pedagogy in a small and a large classroom setting and what improvements have been done in addressing students’ concerns. 93% of the students found the process of creating the questions for the quiz to be helpful in reviewing the material learned in the class and the process of taking the quiz to be helpful in learning the material; 93% of the students indicated that they learned from their classmates; and 13% of the students preferred lecture only class. The project is a result of an international collaboration with professors from two different universities across three different disciplines in STEM including Civil Engineering, Computer Science and, Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Slight variations of the method was employed based on the specific nature of the class. The project consists of the students working in groups to create questions and answers related to a topic briefly described in class. The questions and answers are presented in an online forum monitored by the class instructor for all the students to see. The students are then quizzed on questions from the pool asked by them online. The project was implemented in a range of class sizes from 20 students to 120 students.

[1]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course , 2000 .

[2]  Rose M. Marra,et al.  Content analysis of online discussion forums: A comparative analysis of protocols , 2004 .

[3]  Leonard Springer,et al.  Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[4]  S. Easton,et al.  Strategies for Enhancing Student Interaction and Immediacy in Online Courses , 2005 .

[5]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Procedural learning: II. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. , 1991 .

[6]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  PREDICTING LEARNING FROM ASYNCHRONOUS ONLINE DISCUSSIONS , 2019, Online Learning.

[7]  R. Felder,et al.  Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. , 1988 .

[8]  Brian D. Beitzel,et al.  Can vocabulary-learning strategies and pair-learning formats be profitably combined? , 2000 .

[9]  Kurtis G. Paterson Student Perceptions of Internet‐Based Learning Tools in Environmental Engineering Education , 1999 .

[10]  Jo Davies,et al.  Performance in e-learning: online participation and student grades , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[11]  Sian Bayne,et al.  The appropriation and repurposing of social technologies in higher education , 2009, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[12]  J. DeLuca,et al.  Can the repetition effect maximize learning in multiple sclerosis? , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[13]  Arshia Khan,et al.  Speed Learning: Maximizing Student Learning and Engagement in a Limited Amount of Time , 2016 .

[14]  Steve Joordens,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of a voluntary online discussion forum on improving students' course performance , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[15]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom , 2006 .

[16]  Stuart R. Palmer,et al.  Does the discussion help? The impact of a formally assessed online discussion on final student results , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[17]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Can you repeat that? Qualitative effects of repetition and advance organizers on learning from science prose. , 1983 .

[18]  M. Kutas,et al.  Fractionating the Word Repetition Effect with Event-Related Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.