A comparison of human muscle temperature increases during 3-MHz continuous and pulsed ultrasound with equivalent temporal average intensities.

STUDY DESIGN A repeated-measure crossover design was used. The independent variable was the type of ultrasound (pulsed or continuous) and the dependent variable was intramuscular temperature. OBJECTIVE To compare changes in intramuscular temperature resulting from the use of pulsed ultrasound versus continuous ultrasound with an equivalent spatial average temporal average (SATA) intensity. BACKGROUND There is a lack of research on the heat-generating capabilities of pulsed ultrasound within human muscle. METHODS AND MEASURES The subjects were 16 healthy volunteers (mean age +/- SD, 21.3 +/- 2.5 years). Each subject was treated with pulsed ultrasound (3 MHz, 1.0 W/cm2, 50% duty cycle, for 10 minutes) and continuous ultrasound (3 MHz, 0.5 W/cm2, for 10 minutes) during a single testing session. Tissue temperature returned to baseline and stabilized between treatments and treatment order was randomized. Tissue temperature was measured every 30 seconds using a 26-gauge needle microprobe inserted at a depth of 2 cm in the left medial gastrocnemius muscle. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed model. RESULTS Treatment with continuous ultrasound produced a mean (+/-SD) temperature increase of 2.8 degrees C +/- 0.8 degrees C above baseline. Treatment with pulsed ultrasound produced a mean (+/-SD) temperature increase of 2.8 degrees C +/- 0.7 degrees C above baseline. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in either the extent or rate of temperature increases between the 2 modes of ultrasound application. CONCLUSION Pulsed ultrasound (3 MHz, 1.0 W/cm2, 50% duty cycle, for 10 minutes) produces similar intramuscular temperature increases as continuous ultrasound (3 MHz, 0.5 W/cm2, for 10 minutes) at a 2-cm depth in the human gastrocnemius. Spatial average temporal average intensity is an important consideration when selecting pulsed ultrasound parameters intended to deliver nonthermal effects.

[1]  M. Kenward,et al.  Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. , 1997, Biometrics.

[2]  N. Byl,et al.  Low-dose ultrasound effects on wound healing: a controlled study with Yucatan pigs. , 1992, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

[3]  M. Dyson,et al.  Stimulation of tissue repair by ultrasound: a survey of the mechanisms involved. , 1978, Physiotherapy.

[4]  D. Draper,et al.  Rate of temperature increase in human muscle during 1 MHz and 3 MHz continuous ultrasound. , 1995, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[5]  M. Dyson,et al.  The effect of therapeutic ultrasound on calcium uptake in fibroblasts. , 1988, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  D. Draper,et al.  Temperature changes in deep muscles of humans during ice and ultrasound therapies: an in vivo study. , 1995, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[7]  Justus F. Lehmann Therapeutic heat and cold , 1975 .

[8]  C. Ingersoll,et al.  A comparison of intramuscular temperatures during ultrasound treatments with coupling gel or gel pads. , 2002, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[9]  R. Littell SAS System for Mixed Models , 1996 .

[10]  G terHaar,et al.  Basic physics of therapeutic ultrasound. , 1978 .

[11]  D. Kirkendall,et al.  A comparison of temperature rise in human calf muscles following applications of underwater and topical gel ultrasound. , 1993, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[12]  D. Draper,et al.  Rate of Temperature Decay in Human Muscle Following 3 MHz Ultrasound: The Stretching Window Revealed. , 1995, Journal of athletic training.

[13]  Kramer Jf Ultrasound: evaluation of its mechanical and thermal effects. , 1984, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  F. Duck,et al.  A review of therapeutic ultrasound: biophysical effects. , 2001, Physical therapy.

[15]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Elongation of rat tail tendon: effect of load and temperature. , 1971, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  M. El‐Gindy,et al.  Comparative evaluation of the effects of ultrasonic and ultraviolet irradiation on tissue regeneration. , 1986, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[17]  N. Byl,et al.  Incisional wound healing: a controlled study of low and high dose ultrasound. , 1993, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[18]  M. Dyson,et al.  The stimulation of tissue regeneration by means of ultrasound. , 1968, Clinical science.

[19]  S. Devor,et al.  Identical 3-MHz ultrasound treatments with different devices produce different intramuscular temperatures. , 2003, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[20]  L. Crum,et al.  The effect of therapeutic ultrasound on electrophysiological parameters of frog skin. , 1989, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[21]  D. Heisey,et al.  The Abuse of Power , 2001 .

[22]  F. E. Satterthwaite Synthesis of variance , 1941 .

[23]  M. Dyson,et al.  The effect of therapeutic ultrasound on angiogenesis. , 1990, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[24]  W. Prentice Therapeutic Modalities in Sports Medicine , 1986 .