Partitioning ground reaction forces for multi-segment foot joint kinetics.

BACKGROUND Kinematic multi-segment foot models have been increasingly used to study foot function. The addition of kinetics to these models may enhance their utility; however, this been hindered by limitations in measuring ground reaction forces (GRFs) under individual foot segments. PURPOSE To determine the accuracy of partitioning segment GRFs from a single force platform on foot joint kinetics. METHODS Two potential partitioning methods were applied to a previously published three-segment kinetic foot model. The first method calculated joint kinetics only when the center of pressure crossed anterior to a joint (CPcross). The second method utilized a virtual pressure mat and a proportionality assumption to partition GRFs from the force platform (PRESS). Accuracy was assessed by comparing joint moments and powers obtained from each partitioning method to those obtained from a dual force plate approach that isolated forces under two segments at a time (2Plate). Thirteen healthy pediatric subjects walked in a controlled manner so as to isolate the kinetics acting at the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint and, subsequently, the midtarsal joint. RESULTS The PRESS method was generally more accurate than the CPcross method, and both methods were more accurate at the midtarsal joint than at the MTP joint. At the MTP joint, sagittal plane moment peaks, power peaks, and work done were slightly overestimated, more so by CPcross than PRESS. At the midtarsal joint, sagittal plane moments were captured well by PRESS, while CPcross missed the early portion of the moment, but both methods captured power profiles fairly accurately. SIGNIFICANCE Analysis of kinetics in multi-segment foot models may provide insight into foot function, pathologies, and interventions. Partitioning accuracy and generalizability is promising for analysis of the midtarsal joints but has limitations at the MTP joint.

[1]  D. Winter,et al.  Biomechanical model of the human foot: kinematics and kinetics during the stance phase of walking. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  B. MacWilliams,et al.  Foot kinematics and kinetics during adolescent gait. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[3]  Philippe C Dixon,et al.  Ankle and midfoot kinetics during normal gait: a multi-segment approach. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Dustin A. Bruening,et al.  Analysis of a kinetic multi-segment foot model. Part I: Model repeatability and kinematic validity. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[5]  T. Theologis,et al.  Repeatability of a model for measuring multi-segment foot kinematics in children. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[6]  Kevin Deschamps,et al.  Estimation of foot joint kinetics in three and four segment foot models using an existing proportionality scheme: Application in paediatric barefoot walking. , 2017, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Dustin A. Bruening,et al.  Analysis of a kinetic multi-segment foot model part II: kinetics and clinical implications. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[8]  Dustin A. Bruening,et al.  Measured and estimated ground reaction forces for multi-segment foot models. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Brian L. Davis,et al.  A Device for Simultaneous Measurement of Pressure and Shear Force Distribution on the Plantar Surface of the Foot , 1998 .

[10]  Colin R. Firminger,et al.  The influence of minimalist footwear and stride length reduction on lower-extremity running mechanics and cumulative loading. , 2016, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[11]  R. Olshen,et al.  The development of mature gait. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  R. Wells The projection of the ground reaction force as a predictor of internal joint moments. , 1981, Bulletin of prosthetics research.

[13]  G.F. Harris,et al.  Validation of a multi-segment foot and ankle kinematic model for pediatric gait , 2001, 2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[14]  Jukka Lekkala,et al.  Plantar shear stress measurements - A review. , 2014, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  Kirsty A. McDonald,et al.  The Role of Arch Compression and Metatarsophalangeal Joint Dynamics in Modulating Plantar Fascia Strain in Running , 2016, PloS one.

[16]  A. Leardini,et al.  Rear-foot, mid-foot and fore-foot motion during the stance phase of gait. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[17]  B. Nigg,et al.  Mechanical energy contribution of the metatarsophalangeal joint to running and sprinting. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Wells Rp The projection of the ground reaction force as a predictor of internal joint moments. , 1981 .

[19]  S I Wolf,et al.  The Heidelberg foot measurement method: development, description and assessment. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[20]  B. MacWilliams,et al.  Kinematics and kinetics of normal and planovalgus feet during walking. , 2014, Gait & posture.

[21]  Brian L Davis,et al.  Plantar shear stress distributions: comparing actual and predicted frictional forces at the foot-ground interface. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  V Macellari,et al.  Piezo-dynamometric platform for a more complete analysis of foot-to-floor interaction. , 1997, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.