Business Rationale for Linked Data at Governments: A Case Study at the Netherlands’ Kadaster Data Platform

Linked Data is an innovative approach for publishing heterogeneous data sources on the web. As such, it can transcend the traditional confines of separate databases, as well as the confines of separate institutions. At the same time, businesses and governmental organizations alike are trying to cope with ever-increasing quantities of heterogeneous data that must be used across multiple departments, manufacturing locations, and governmental bodies. Linked Data would, therefore, be a great technological solution for today’s organizational problems. However, we observe that a serious gap exists between Linked Data research and business research. While Linked Data research is almost exclusively technologically oriented, the business research literature has not devoted much attention to the use of Linked Data solutions yet. In this paper, we seek to bridge this gap, by introducing a real-world use case where Linked Data technologies are applied in large-scale government settings. We argue in detail that Linked Data provides a major contribution to the business vision of a modern governmental institution based on the experience of the Netherlands’ Cadastre Land Registry and Mapping Agency (Kadaster), so far, the largest implementation of Linked Data in the governments of the Netherlands.

[1]  Armin Haller,et al.  Best practices for publishing, retrieving, and using spatial data on the web , 2018, Semantic Web.

[2]  Christoph Lange,et al.  Evaluating the quality of the LOD cloud: An empirical investigation , 2018, Semantic Web.

[3]  Wolfram Wöß,et al.  Towards a Definition of Knowledge Graphs , 2016, SEMANTiCS.

[4]  Adegboyega K. Ojo,et al.  Towards a Linked Geospatial Data Infrastructure , 2013, EGOVIS/EDEM.

[5]  Wouter Beek,et al.  Enhancing the Usefulness of Open Governmental Data with Linked Data Viewing Techniques , 2019, HICSS.

[6]  John G. Breslin,et al.  Semantic Web computing in industry , 2010, Comput. Ind..

[7]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  Five stars of Linked Data vocabulary use , 2014, Semantic Web.

[8]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  A Contextualised Semantics for owl: sameAs , 2016, ESWC.

[9]  S. Sudarshan,et al.  Data models , 1996, CSUR.

[10]  George Percivall,et al.  The application of open standards to enhance the interoperability of geoscience information , 2010, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[11]  Ig Ibert Bittencourt,et al.  A systematic review on the use of best practices for publishing linked data , 2018, Online Inf. Rev..

[12]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact , 2012, MIS Q..

[13]  Alenka Krek Geographic Information as an Economic Good , 2005 .

[14]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  The observational roots of reference of the semantic web , 2012, ArXiv.

[15]  Rob Lemmens,et al.  Next Generation of Spatial Data Infrastructure: Lessons from Linked Data implementations across Europe , 2019, Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..

[16]  Claudia Wagner,et al.  The Linked Data Value Chain: A Lightweight Model for Business Engineers , 2009, I-SEMANTICS.

[17]  Michael J. Hogan,et al.  Connecting societal issues, users and data. Scenario-based design of open data platforms , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[18]  Marcelo Arenas,et al.  Semantics and complexity of SPARQL , 2006, TODS.

[19]  Wouter Beek,et al.  AN INTEGRATED APPROACH FOR LINKED DATA BROWSING , 2017 .

[20]  Jennifer Black,et al.  On the derivation of value from geospatial linked data , 2013 .

[21]  Huajun Chen,et al.  The Semantic Web , 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[22]  Patrick J. Hayes,et al.  When owl: sameAs isn't the Same Redux: Towards a Theory of Identity, Context, and Inference on the Semantic Web , 2015, CONTEXT.

[23]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods , 2017 .

[24]  Jens Lehmann,et al.  Quality assessment for Linked Data: A Survey , 2015, Semantic Web.

[25]  John Bulles,et al.  Analyzing the New 2019 Dutch Environment and Planning Act , 2017, OTM Workshops.

[26]  Glen Hart,et al.  Geospatial semantics and linked spatiotemporal data - Past, present, and future , 2012, Semantic Web.

[27]  Heiko Paulheim,et al.  Knowledge graph refinement: A survey of approaches and evaluation methods , 2016, Semantic Web.

[28]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked Data - The Story So Far , 2009, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[29]  Tom Heath,et al.  Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space , 2011, Linked Data.

[30]  Tobias Bachmeier,et al.  Business Model Generation A Handbook For Visionaries Game Changers And Challengers , 2016 .

[31]  Triet Le,et al.  Data.world: A Platform for Global-Scale Semantic Publishing , 2017, International Semantic Web Conference.

[32]  Tassilo Pellegrini,et al.  Linked data business cube: a systematic approach to semantic web business models , 2014, MindTrek.

[33]  Mark J. Weal,et al.  Digital Futures? Sociological Challenges and Opportunities in the Emergent Semantic Web , 2013 .

[34]  Leo Sauermann,et al.  Cool URIs for the semantic web , 2007 .

[35]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[36]  Jack Verhoosel,et al.  State of the Art on Semantic IS Standardization, Interoperability & Quality , 2011 .

[37]  Tomi Kinnari Open data business models for media industry - Finnish case study , 2013 .

[38]  Wouter Beek,et al.  Linked Data Viewing as part of the Spatial Data Platform of the Future , 2018 .

[39]  Erwin Folmer,et al.  Linked Data for Transaction Based Enterprise Interoperability , 2015, IWEI.

[40]  Jitka Komarkova,et al.  Big and open linked data analytics ecosystem: Theoretical background and essential elements , 2019, Gov. Inf. Q..

[41]  Andreas Blumauer Linked Data in Unternehmen. Methodische Grundlagen und Einsatzszenarien , 2014 .

[42]  María Poveda-Villalón,et al.  Linked Open Vocabularies (LOV): A gateway to reusable semantic vocabularies on the Web , 2016, Semantic Web.

[43]  Jun Zhao,et al.  Describing Linked Datasets On the Design and Usage of voiD, the "Vocabulary Of Interlinked Datasets" , 2009 .

[44]  M. Petró‐Turza,et al.  The International Organization for Standardization. , 2003 .

[45]  Jens Lehmann,et al.  DBpedia - A crystallization point for the Web of Data , 2009, J. Web Semant..

[46]  Erwin Folmer,et al.  Quality of semantic standards , 2012 .

[47]  Erik Schultes,et al.  The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship , 2016, Scientific Data.

[48]  Rob Lemmens,et al.  Technological Aspects of (Linked) Open Data , 2018 .

[49]  Christoph Lange,et al.  Luzzu—A Methodology and Framework for Linked Data Quality Assessment , 2016, JDIQ.

[50]  Olaf Hartig,et al.  Publishing and Consuming Provenance Metadata on the Web of Linked Data , 2010, IPAW.

[51]  Arnold Bregt,et al.  The economic value of the Dutch geo-information sector , 2010, Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..

[52]  Tom Scott,et al.  Use of Semantic Web technologies on the BBC Web Sites , 2010, Linking Enterprise Data.