Acquisition of procedures: The effects of example elaborations and active learning exercises

Abstract This study explored the effects of active learning and types of elaboration on procedure acquisition (writing database queries). Training materials emphasized elaborations of conditions for executing actions versus elaborations of the connection between conditions and actions. In the “active” conditions, participants performed structured exercises designed to encourage active processing. In the “passive” conditions, participants studied examples that contained instructional elaborations. Although excessive instructional information for more knowledgeable learners can hurt performance, our results indicate that condition–action elaborations improved procedural performance the most, in both the active and passive conditions. Active learning required longer training time but was offset by reduced test time.

[1]  A. Renkl.  Learning mathematics from worked-out examples: Analyzing and fostering self-explanations , 1999 .

[2]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Effective Tutoring Techniques: A Comparison of Human Tutors and Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 1992 .

[3]  Charles Welty,et al.  Correcting User Errors in SQL , 1985, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[4]  R. Catrambone.  The subgoal learning model: Creating better examples so that students can solve novel problems. , 1998 .

[5]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[6]  Richard Catrambone,et al.  Aiding Transfer in Statistics: Examining the Use of Conceptually Oriented Equations and Elaborations during Subgoal Learning. , 2003 .

[7]  Richard Catrambone,et al.  Designing Instructional Examples to Reduce Intrinsic Cognitive Load: Molar versus Modular Presentation of Solution Procedures , 2004 .

[8]  R. Grice.  Minimalism Beyond the Nurnberg Funnel , 1998 .

[9]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Prompting, feedback and error correction in the design of a scenario machine , 1985, CHI '85.

[10]  John M. Carroll,et al.  The Minimal Manual , 1987, SGCH.

[11]  Paul Chandler,et al.  Levels of Expertise and Instructional Design , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[12]  Rick F. van der Lans,et al.  Introduction to SQL , 1988 .

[13]  Robert J. Dufresne,et al.  Constraining Novices to Perform Expertlike Problem Analyses: Effects on Schema Acquisition , 1992 .

[14]  P. David Pearson.  Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[15]  Antonija Mitrovic,et al.  An Intelligent SQL Tutor on the Web , 2003, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[16]  David E. Kieras,et al.  Toward a Model of Acquiring Procedures from Text , 1989 .

[17]  J. B. Smelcer.  Understanding user errors in database query , 1990 .

[18]  Matthew W. Lewis,et al.  Self-Explonations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  L M Reder,et al.  The role of elaborations in learning a skill from an instructional text , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Richard Catrambone,et al.  Learning a word processing system with training wheels and guided exploration , 1987, CHI '87.

[21]  M. Chi,et al.  The Content of Physics Self-Explanations , 1991 .

[22]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  R. Catrambone.  Generalizing Solution Procedures Learned From Examples , 1996 .

[24]  S. Derry,et al.  Learning from Examples: Instructional Principles from the Worked Examples Research , 2000 .

[25]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Multimedia in Learning , 2001 .

[26]  D. C. Merrill,et al.  Tutoring: Guided Learning by Doing , 1995 .