Speed-accuracy trade-offs in myocontrol.

Myoelectric (EMG) signals are used in assistive technology for prostheses, computer and domestic control. However, little is known about the capacity of controlling these signals. Specifically, it is unclear whether myocontrol, i.e., the control of myoelectric signals, obeys the same laws as motor control. Neurologically intact adult participants performed pointing tasks with EMG signals captured from the forehead or the hand in two modalities (sustained: stabilize the signal amplitude in the target; impulsion: produce an impulse and return to resting level). In the sustained modality, the time to reach the target (reach time) increased logarithmically with target amplitude, which is compatible with the predictions of Fitts' law. The rate of failure was not significantly affected by target amplitude. In the impulsion modality, the reach time and the rate of failure followed a bow-shaped pattern as a function of target amplitude. Stabilization time in the sustained modality followed a convex (bow-shaped) pattern for the forehead and a concave pattern for the hand. This was the only significant effect of electrode placement in this study. These findings suggest that myocontrol obeys laws that are distinct from those determining motor control, and that the muscular and intra-muscular synergies that produce EMG signals are specific of each pointing modality and target amplitude.

[1]  K. Lee,et al.  Myofeedback for muscle retraining in hemiplegic patients. , 1976, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  Ravindra S. Goonetilleke,et al.  Target-Directed Head Movements in a Head-Coupled Virtual Environment: Predicting the Effects of Lags Using Fitts' Law , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[3]  C. Gielen,et al.  Relation between location of a motor unit in the human biceps brachii and its critical firing levels for different tasks , 1984, Experimental Neurology.

[4]  M. Lorenzoni,et al.  A comparison of the muscular relaxation effect of TENS and EMG‐biofeedback in patients with bruxism , 2001 .

[5]  M L Lin,et al.  A Method for Evaluating Head-Controlled Computer Input Devices Using Fitts' Law , 1990, Human factors.

[6]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[7]  David E. Meyer,et al.  Speed—Accuracy Tradeoffs in Aimed Movements: Toward a Theory of Rapid Voluntary Action , 2018, Attention and Performance XIII.

[8]  S. Riek,et al.  Bimanual aiming and overt attention: one law for two hands , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  D. Silcox,et al.  Myoelectric prostheses. A long-term follow-up and a study of the use of alternate prostheses. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  M. Hallett,et al.  EMG analysis of stereotyped voluntary movements in man. , 1975, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[11]  D Mottet,et al.  The dynamics of rhythmical aiming in 2D task space: relation between geometry and kinematics under examination. , 2001, Human movement science.

[12]  I. Spence Visual psychophysics of simple graphical elements. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  A. Murata,et al.  Extending Fitts' law to a three-dimensional pointing task. , 2001, Human movement science.

[14]  T. S. Constantinidis,et al.  Speed-accuracy trade-off in the performance of pointing movements in different directions in two-dimensional space , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  Allison Druin,et al.  Differences in pointing task performance between preschool children and adults using mice , 2004, TCHI.

[16]  M. Y. Lee,et al.  Design and assessment of an adaptive intermittent cervical traction modality with EMG biofeedback. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[17]  P Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Facial paralysis rehabilitation: retraining selective muscle control. , 1982, International rehabilitation medicine.

[18]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  A test between two hypotheses and a possible third way for the control of prehension , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  Gilbert Cockton,et al.  The "Cyberlink" Brain-Body Interface as an Assistive Technology for Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury: Longitudinal Results from a Group of Case Studies , 1999, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[20]  B. Etnyre,et al.  Accuracy Characteristics of Throwing as a Result of Maximum Force Effort , 1998, Perceptual and motor skills.

[21]  P. Fitts,et al.  INFORMATION CAPACITY OF DISCRETE MOTOR RESPONSES. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  D S Childress,et al.  A preliminary investigation of pelvic obliquity patterns during gait in persons with transtibial and transfemoral amputation. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[23]  William K. Durfee Control of prosthetic gait , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[24]  R J Cox,et al.  Myoelectric and force feedback in the facilitation of isometric strength training: a controlled comparison. , 1983, Psychophysiology.

[25]  R. Schmidt,et al.  The relationship between force and force variability in minimal and near-maximal static and dynamic contractions. , 1980, Journal of motor behavior.

[26]  R Plamondon,et al.  Speed/accuracy trade-offs in target-directed movements , 1997, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[27]  M Adjouadi,et al.  A practical EMG-based human-computer interface for users with motor disabilities. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[28]  E. Hoffmann A comparison of hand and foot movement times. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[29]  M. Duarte,et al.  Fitts’ law in human standing: the effect of scaling , 1999, Neuroscience Letters.

[30]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[31]  C M Light,et al.  Intelligent multifunction myoelectric control of hand prostheses , 2002, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[32]  O. Bock,et al.  Speed-accuracy trade-off of grasping movements during microgravity. , 2002, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[33]  R. Ruddle,et al.  Manual and virtual rotation of a three-dimensional object. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[34]  Ming Zhang,et al.  Motion quality evaluation of upper limb target-reaching movements. , 2002, Medical engineering & physics.

[35]  Robert Sessions Woodworth,et al.  THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT , 1899 .

[36]  H. H. Sears,et al.  PROPORTIONAL MYOELECTRIC HAND CONTROL: AN EVALUATION , 1991, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[37]  Philip Constantinou,et al.  Designing human-computer interfaces for quadriplegic people , 2003, TCHI.

[38]  L.J. Trejo,et al.  Multimodal neuroelectric interface development , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[39]  M. Ferrarin,et al.  A pilot study of myoelectrically controlled FES of upper extremity , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[40]  P. Viviani,et al.  Trajectory determines movement dynamics , 1982, Neuroscience.

[41]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[42]  Pamela J Bryden,et al.  Pushing the Limits of Task Difficulty for the Right and Left Hands in Manual Aiming , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[43]  C. Webb The use of myoelectric feedback in teaching facial expression to the blind , 1977, Biofeedback and self-regulation.

[44]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[45]  Yves Guiard,et al.  Fitts' law in two-dimensional task space , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[46]  R. Bootsma,et al.  The dynamics of human isometric pointing movements under varying accuracy requirements , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[47]  E. Hoffmann,et al.  Geometrical conditions for ballistic and visually controlled movements. , 1988, Ergonomics.

[48]  J. Duysens,et al.  The breakdown of Fitts’ law in rapid, reciprocal aiming movements , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[49]  C. MacKenzie,et al.  The speed-accuracy trade-off in manual prehension: effects of movement amplitude, object size and object width on kinematic characteristics , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[50]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Virtual environments and advanced interface design , 1995 .

[51]  George E Stelmach,et al.  Effects of target height and width on 2D pointing movement duration and kinematics. , 2003, Motor control.

[52]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Visual feedback of myoelectric output to facilitate muscle relaxation in normal persons and patients with neck injuries. , 1969, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[53]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Input devices and interaction techniques for advanced computing , 1995 .