Stimulus devaluation and extinction of chain schedule performance

Pigeons were trained on a two-component multiple schedule in which each separate component consisted of a three-link chain schedule. After initial baseline training, the stimuli correlated with the terminal links of each chain were presented in a successive discrimination, with one stimulus continuing to be associated with reinforcement while responses to the alternative stimulus were extinguished. Subjects were then returned to the original chain schedule, but with extinction in effect in both components of the multiple schedule. In two separate experiments, extinction of initial-link responding was not affected by which terminal link had been extinguished during the separate discrimination training, indicating that devaluation of the terminal link was not transmitted directly to the initial link of the chain. There was also no effect of the devaluation procedure during the first session of testing on responding in the middle link of the chain, but an effect did develop with continued extinction of the entire chain when the terminal components were presented during extinction. When the terminal components were omitted, however, the latter effect did not occur. Also, when the terminal link was omitted, extinction occurred more rapidly in the middle component than in the initial component, indicating a backward pattern of extinction.

[1]  R. M. Elliott,et al.  Behavior of Organisms , 1991 .

[2]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  Some Data on the Discriminative Stimulus Hypothesis of Secondary Reinforcement , 1965 .

[3]  J. E. Mazur,et al.  Learning and Behavior , 1966 .

[4]  P. Hanford,et al.  Effects of conditioned reinforcement frequency in an intermittent free-feeding situation. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  R. Rescorla,et al.  The effect of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after first- and second-order appetitive conditioning. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[6]  R. W. Griffin,et al.  Second-order conditioning of the pigeon’s keypeck , 1977 .

[7]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Aspects of the reinforcer learned in second-order Pavlovian conditioning. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[8]  James S. Nairne,et al.  Second-order conditioning with diffuse auditory reinforcers in the pigeon☆ , 1981 .

[9]  A. Dickinson Contemporary Animal Learning Theory , 1981 .

[10]  M. Rashotte,et al.  Signaling functions of the second-order CS: Partial reinforcement during second-order conditioning of the pigeon’s keypeck , 1981 .

[11]  J. Nevin,et al.  Response rate and resistance to change in chained schedules. , 1981 .

[12]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Associative Structures In Instrumental Learning , 1986 .

[13]  Effects of delayed conditioned reinforcement in chain schedules. , 1987, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  B. Williams,et al.  Conditioned reinforcement versus time to reinforcement in chain schedules. , 1990, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  Daniel N. Osherson,et al.  Formal Learning Theory , 1997 .