Simple bioreactors for mass propagation of plants

AbstractBioreactors provide a rapid and efficient plant propagation system for many agricultural and forestry species, utilizing liquid media to avoid intensive manual handling. Large-scale liquid cultures have been used for micropropagation through organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis pathways. Various types of bioreactors with gas-sparged mixing are suitable for the production of clusters of buds, meristems or protocorms. A simple glass bubble-column bioreactor for the proliferation of ornamental and vegetable crop species resulted in biomass increase of 3 to 6-fold in 3–4 weeks. An internal loop bioreactor was used for asparagus, celery and cucumber embryogenic cultures. However, as the biomass increased, the mixing and circulation were not optimal and growth was reduced. A disposable pre-sterilized plastic bioreactor (2–5-l volume) was used for the proliferation of meristematic clusters of several ornamental, vegetable and woody plant species. The plastic bioreactor induced minimal shearing and foaming, resulting in an increase in biomass as compared to the glass bubble-column bioreactor. A major issue related to the use of liquid media in bioreactors is hyperhydricity, that is, morphogenic malformation. Liquid cultures impose stress signals that are expressed in developmental aberrations. Submerged tissues exhibit oxidative stress, with elevated concentrations of reactive oxygen species associated with a change in antioxidant enzyme activity. These changes affect the anatomy and physiology of the plants and their survival. Malformation was controlled by adding growth retardants to decrease rapid proliferation. Growth retardants ancymidol or paclobutrazol reduced water uptake during cell proliferation, decreased vacuolation and intercellular spaces, shortened the stems and inhibited leaf expansion, inducing the formation of clusters. Using a two-stage bioreactor process, the medium was changed in the second stage to a medium lacking growth retardants to induce development of the meristematic clusters into buds or somatic embryos. Cluster biomass increased 10–15-fold during a period of 25–30 days depending on the species. Potato bud clusters cultured in 1.5 1 of medium in a 2-l capacity bioreactor, increased during 10–30 days. Poplar in vitro roots regenerated buds in the presence of thidiazuron (TDZ); the biomass increased 12-fold in 30 days. Bioreactor-regenerated clusters were separated with a manual cutter, producing small propagule units that formed shoots and initiated roots. Clusters of buds or meristematic nodules with reduced shoots, as well as arrested leaf growth, had less distortion and were optimal for automated cutting and dispensing. In tuber-, bulb- and corm-producing plants, growth retardants and elevated sucrose concentrations in the media were found to enhance storage organ formation, providing a better propagule for transplanting or storage. Bioreactor-cultures have several advantages compared with agar-based cultures, with a better control of the contact of the plant tissue with the culture medium, and optimal nutrient and growth regulator supply, as well as aeration and medium circulation, the filtration of the medium and the scaling-up of the cultures. Micropropagation in bioreactors for optimal plant production will depend on a better understanding of plant responses to signals from the microenvironment and on specific culture manipulation to control the morphogenesis of plants in liquid cultures.

[1]  M. Akita,et al.  BIOREACTOR TECHNIQUES FOR LARGE-SCALE CULTURE OF PLANT PROPAGULES , 1998 .

[2]  M. Ziv,et al.  Scaled-up proliferation and regeneration of Nerine in liquid cultures Part II. Ontogeny of somatic embryos and bulblet regeneration , 1994, Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture.

[3]  M. Ziv,et al.  The effect of ancymidol on hyperhydricity, regeneration, starch and antioxidant enzymatic activities in liquid-cultured Narcissus , 2001, Plant Cell Reports.

[4]  H. Pedersen,et al.  CHAPTER 8 – Bioreactors and Image Analysis for Scale-Up and Plant Propagation , 1991 .

[5]  Véronique Jay,et al.  Bioreactor studies on the effect of dissolved oxygen concentrations on growth and differentiation of carrot (Daucus carota L.) cell cultures , 1992, Plant Cell Reports.

[6]  M. Akita,et al.  Induction and development of potato tubers in a jar fermentor , 1994, Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture.

[7]  M. Lartaud,et al.  Improvement of somatic embryogenesis in Hevea brasiliensis (Müll. Arg.) using the temporary immersion technique , 1997, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant.

[8]  D. Becker,et al.  High-yielding repetitive somatic embryogenesis and plant recovery in a selected tea clone, ‘TRI-2025’, by temporary immersion , 2000, Plant Cell Reports.

[9]  M. Ziv,et al.  Bud proliferation and plant regeneration in liquid-cultured philodendron treated with ancymidol and paclobutrazol , 1991, Journal of Plant Growth Regulation.

[10]  B. McCown,et al.  Nodule Culture: A Developmental Pathway with High Potential for Regeneration, Automated Micropropagation, and Plant Metabolite Production from Woody Plants , 1988 .

[11]  M. Ziv Vitrification: morphological and physiological disorders of in vitro plants , 1991 .

[12]  Toyoki Kozai,et al.  Automation in plant tissue culture — general introduction and overview — , 1995 .

[13]  M. Lartaud,et al.  SIMPLE APPARATUS TO PERFORM PLANT TISSUE CULTURE BY TEMPORARY IMMERSION , 1996 .

[14]  S. Takayama Mass Propagation of Plants Through Shake- and Bioreactor-Culture Techniques , 1991 .

[15]  F. Skoog,et al.  A revised medium for the growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue culture , 1962 .

[16]  R. Luttman,et al.  Silicone-tubing aerated bioreactors for somatic embryo production , 1994, Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture.

[17]  P. Joyce,et al.  Sucrose utilization during potato microtuber growth in bioreactors , 2000, Plant Cell Reports.

[18]  A. Scragg,et al.  Somatic embryo production in bioreactors , 1992 .

[19]  Jose C. Merchuk,et al.  Why use air-lift bioreactors? , 1990 .

[20]  H. N. Murthy,et al.  Mass multiplication of protocorm-like bodies using bioreactor system and subsequent plant regeneration in Phalaenopsis , 2004, Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture.

[21]  D. J. Styer,et al.  Bioreactor Technology for Plant Propagation , 1985 .

[22]  P. Weathers,et al.  Simplified acoustic window mist bioreactor , 1997 .

[23]  W. Preil Application of bioreactors in plant propagation , 1991 .

[24]  R. D. Williams,et al.  Nutritional Aspects of Daucus Carota Somatic Embryo Cultures Performed in Bioreactors , 1995 .

[25]  M. Ziv In vitro acclimatization , 1995 .

[26]  M. Ziv The use of growth retardants for the regulation and acclimatization of in vitro plants , 1992 .

[27]  José Carlos Lorenzo,et al.  Sugarcane shoot formation in an improved temporary immersion system , 1998, Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture.

[28]  M. Ziv THE CONTROL OF BIOREACTOR ENVIRONMENT FOR PLANT PROPAGATION IN LIQUID CULTURE , 1995 .

[29]  Maritza Escalona,et al.  Pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr) micropropagation in temporary immersion systems , 1999, Plant Cell Reports.

[30]  C. Teisson,et al.  A New Concept of Plant In Vitro Cultivation Liquid Medium: Temporary Immersion , 1995 .

[31]  Michael W. Fowler,et al.  The Aeration of Catharanthus roseus L. G. Don Suspension Cultures in Airlift Bioreactors: The Inhibitory Effect at High Aeration Rates on Culture Growth , 1986 .

[32]  M. Ziv Morphogenesis of Gladiolus Buds in Bioreactors — Implication for Scaled-up Propagation of Geophytes , 1990 .

[33]  M. Ziv,et al.  Carbohydrate metabolism in Nerine sarniensis bulbs developing in liquid culture , 2000 .