Co-evolution of cancer microenvironment reveals distinctive patterns of gastric cancer invasion: laboratory evidence and clinical significance

BackgroundCancer invasion results from constant interactions between cancer cells and their microenvironment. Major components of the cancer microenvironment are stromal cells, infiltrating inflammatory cells, collagens, matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) and newly formed blood vessels. This study was to determine the roles of MMP-9, MMP-2, type IV collagen, infiltrating macrophages and tumor microvessels in gastric cancer (GC) invasion and their clinico-pathological significance.MethodsParaffin-embedded tissue sections from 37 GC patients were studied by Streptavidin-Peroxidase (SP) immunohistochemical technique to determine the levels of MMP-2, MMP-9, type IV collagen, macrophages infiltration and microvessel density (MVD). Different invasion patterns were delineated and their correlation with major clinico-pathological information was explored.ResultsMMP2 expression was higher in malignant gland compared to normal gland, especially nearby the basement membrane (BM). High densities of macrophages at the interface of cancer nests and stroma were found where BM integrity was destroyed. MMP2 expression was significantly increased in cases with recurrence and distant metastasis (P = 0.047 and 0.048, respectively). Infiltrating macrophages were correlated with serosa invasion (P = 0.011) and TNM stage (P = 0.001). MVD was higher in type IV collagen negative group compared to type IV collagen positive group (P = 0.026). MVD was related to infiltrating macrophages density (P = 0.040). Patients with negative MMP9 expression had better overall survival (OS) compared to those with positive MMP9 expression (Median OS 44.0 vs 13.5 mo, P = 0.036). Median OS was significantly longer in type IV collagen positive group than negative group (Median OS 25.5 vs 10.0 mo, P = 0.044). The cumulative OS rate was higher in low macrophages density group than in high macrophages density group (median OS 40.5 vs 13.0 mo, P = 0.056). Median OS was significantly longer in low MVD group than high MVD group (median OS 39.0 vs 8.5 mo, P = 0.001). The difference of disease-free survival (DFS) between low MVD group and high MVD group was not statistically significant (P = 0.260). Four typical patterns of cancer invasion were identified based on histological study of the cancer tissue, including Washing pattern, Ameba-like pattern, Spindle pattern and Linear pattern.ConclusionsProteolytic enzymes MMP9, MMP2 and macrophages in stroma contribute to GC progression by facilitating the angiogenesis. Cancer invasion patterns may help predict GC metastasis.

[1]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Cancer metastasis networks and the prediction of progression patterns , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[2]  J. Massagué,et al.  Molecular basis of metastasis. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  S. Weiss,et al.  Navigating ECM barriers at the invasive front: the cancer cell-stroma interface. , 2009, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[4]  D. Noonan,et al.  Inflammation, inflammatory cells and angiogenesis: decisions and indecisions , 2008, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[5]  M. Duffy,et al.  Cancer invasion and metastasis: changing views , 2008, The Journal of pathology.

[6]  S. Weiss,et al.  Breaching the basement membrane: who, when and how? , 2008, Trends in cell biology.

[7]  J. Pollard,et al.  Microenvironmental regulation of metastasis , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[8]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective behavior in cancer cell populations , 2009, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[9]  F. Gauffre,et al.  Matrix Architecture Dictates Three-Dimensional Migration Modes of Human Macrophages: Differential Involvement of Proteases and Podosome-Like Structures , 2009, The Journal of Immunology.

[10]  P. Naredi,et al.  Type IV collagen is a tumour stroma-derived biomarker for pancreas cancer , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[11]  R. Kalluri,et al.  Type IV collagen α6 chain‐derived noncollagenous domain 1 (α6(IV)NC1) inhibits angiogenesis and tumor growth , 2007 .

[12]  Russell Hughes,et al.  Tumor-associated macrophages: effectors of angiogenesis and tumor progression. , 2009, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[13]  H. Moses,et al.  Tumor-stroma interactions. , 2005, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[14]  P. Friedl,et al.  The Journal of Cell Biology , 2002 .

[15]  M. Ono Molecular links between tumor angiogenesis and inflammation: inflammatory stimuli of macrophages and cancer cells as targets for therapeutic strategy , 2008, Cancer science.

[16]  Michael R Hamblin,et al.  CA : A Cancer Journal for Clinicians , 2011 .

[17]  Renato V Iozzo,et al.  Matrix revolutions: "tails" of basement-membrane components with angiostatic functions. , 2005, Trends in cell biology.

[18]  E. Cukierman,et al.  Staged stromal extracellular 3D matrices differentially regulate breast cancer cell responses through PI3K and beta1-integrins , 2009, BMC Cancer.

[19]  R. Jaeger,et al.  Role of MMP9 on invadopodia formation in cells from adenoid cystic carcinoma. Study by laser scanning confocal microscopy , 2009, Microscopy research and technique.

[20]  Izhak Haviv,et al.  Co-evolution of tumor cells and their microenvironment. , 2009, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[21]  Lisa M. Coussens,et al.  Immune cells as mediators of solid tumor metastasis , 2008, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[22]  S. George,et al.  Matrix metalloproteinase control of capillary morphogenesis. , 2008, Critical reviews in eukaryotic gene expression.

[23]  M. Sporn,et al.  The tumour microenvironment as a target for chemoprevention , 2007, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[24]  D. Hanahan,et al.  The Hallmarks of Cancer , 2000, Cell.

[25]  L. Tanoue Cancer Statistics, 2009 , 2010 .

[26]  John Condeelis,et al.  Macrophages: Obligate Partners for Tumor Cell Migration, Invasion, and Metastasis , 2006, Cell.

[27]  E. Laconi The evolving concept of tumor microenvironments , 2007, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[28]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Can cancer be reversed by engineering the tumor microenvironment? , 2008, Seminars in cancer biology.

[29]  Peter Friedl,et al.  Tube travel: the role of proteases in individual and collective cancer cell invasion. , 2008, Cancer research.

[30]  Kornelia Polyak,et al.  Microenvironmental regulation of cancer development. , 2008, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[31]  L. Coussens,et al.  Tumor stroma and regulation of cancer development. , 2006, Annual review of pathology.

[32]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  Modeling inducible human tissue neoplasia identifies an extracellular matrix interaction network involved in cancer progression. , 2009, Cancer cell.