Intensification treatment based on early FDG‐PET in patients with high‐risk diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: a phase II GELTAMO trial

We conducted a multicentre, phase II study of interim positron emission tomography (PET) as a guide to risk‐adapted therapy in high‐risk patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients achieving negative fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)‐PET after three courses of R‐MegaCHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) received three additional courses, whereas PET‐positive patients received two courses of R‐IFE (rituximab, ifosfamide, etoposide) followed by BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) and autologous stem‐cell transplantation. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS). 71 patients (median age 55 years, range 25–69) were enrolled. With a median follow‐up of 42·8 months (range 7·2–58·4), the estimated 4‐year PFS and overall survival (OS) were 67% and 78%, respectively, for the global series. Patients in complete remission after interim PET (N = 36) had significantly better 3‐year PFS than those with partial response (N = 30) [81% vs. 57%, Hazard ratio (HR) = 2·6, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1·02–6·65] but not a statistically significant longer OS. A retrospective PET central review was done for 51 patients. According to semiquantitative analysis, 3‐year PFS (81% vs. 33%; HR = 6·9, 95% CI = 2·35–20·6) and OS (95% vs. 33%, HR = 19·4, 95% CI = 3·89–97·0) were significantly better for negative than for positive interim PET patients. Early PET assessment is valuable for risk stratification in DLBCL; for this purpose semiquantitative evaluation is a better predictor than visual criteria.

[1]  David Cunningham,et al.  Rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a phase 3 comparison of dose intensification with 14-day versus 21-day cycles , 2013, The Lancet.

[2]  S. Ferrero,et al.  Interim 18-FDG-PET/CT failed to predict the outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated at the diagnosis with rituximab-CHOP. , 2012, Blood.

[3]  C. Copie-Bergman,et al.  Interim [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy plus rituximab. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  P. Kurtin,et al.  Epratuzumab with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. , 2011, Blood.

[5]  A. López-Guillermo,et al.  CHOP-like chemotherapy with or without rituximab in young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma: 6-year results of an open-label randomised study of the MabThera International Trial (MInT) Group. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[6]  B. Coiffier,et al.  SUVmax reduction improves early prognosis value of interim positron emission tomography scans in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. , 2011, Blood.

[7]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Midtreatment 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron‐emission tomography in aggressive non‐Hodgkin lymphoma , 2011, Cancer.

[8]  Andrew Homb,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT for Early Response Assessment in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Poor Predictive Value of International Harmonization Project Interpretation , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  C. Haioun,et al.  Report on the Second International Workshop on interim positron emission tomography in lymphoma held in Menton, France, 8–9 April 2010 , 2010, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[10]  B. Coiffier,et al.  Long-term outcome of patients in the LNH-98.5 trial, the first randomized study comparing rituximab-CHOP to standard CHOP chemotherapy in DLBCL patients: a study by the Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. , 2010, Blood.

[11]  N. Schmitz,et al.  Salvage regimens with autologous transplantation for relapsed large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  J. Szer,et al.  Improved survival for relapsed diffuse large B cell lymphoma is predicted by a negative pre‐transplant FDG‐PET scan following salvage chemotherapy , 2010, British journal of haematology.

[13]  Dirk Hasenclever,et al.  Standard International prognostic index remains a valid predictor of outcome for patients with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  A. Zelenetz,et al.  Risk-adapted dose-dense immunochemotherapy determined by interim FDG-PET in Advanced-stage diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  C. Haioun,et al.  Interim 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: qualitative or quantitative interpretation – where do we stand? , 2009, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[16]  T. Nihashi,et al.  Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for interim response assessment of advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  A. Rahmouni,et al.  Prognostic Value of Interim 18F-FDG PET in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: SUV-Based Assessment at 4 Cycles of Chemotherapy , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  S. Goodman,et al.  Phase II study of risk-adapted therapy of newly diagnosed, aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma based on midtreatment FDG-PET scanning. , 2009, Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

[19]  Alejandro Martín,et al.  R-ESHAP as salvage therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: the influence of prior exposure to rituximab on outcome. A GEL/TAMO study , 2008, Haematologica.

[20]  J. Rodríguez,et al.  Dose‐escalated CHOP and tailored intensification with IFE according to early response and followed by BEAM/autologous stem‐cell transplantation in poor‐risk aggressive B‐cell lymphoma: a prospective study from the GEL–TAMO Study Group , 2008, European journal of haematology.

[21]  Markus Loeffler,et al.  Six versus eight cycles of bi-weekly CHOP-14 with or without rituximab in elderly patients with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphomas: a randomised controlled trial (RICOVER-60). , 2008, The Lancet. Oncology.

[22]  A Engert,et al.  High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation in the first line treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in adults. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[23]  R. Fanin,et al.  Prognostic Value of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan in Patients with Relapsed Hodgkin Lymphoma or Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Receiving Salvage Chemotherapy Followed by Reduced-Intensity Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation. , 2007 .

[24]  Emmanuel Itti,et al.  Early 18F-FDG PET for Prediction of Prognosis in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: SUV-Based Assessment Versus Visual Analysis , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  R. Gascoyne,et al.  The revised International Prognostic Index (R-IPI) is a better predictor of outcome than the standard IPI for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP. , 2007, Blood.

[26]  Sigrid Stroobants,et al.  Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  Klemens Scheidhauer,et al.  Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  C. Copie-Bergman,et al.  Response assessment after an inductive CHOP or CHOP-like regimen with or without rituximab in 103 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: integrating 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to the International Workshop Criteria. , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[29]  M. O'Doherty,et al.  FDG-PET after two to three cycles of chemotherapy predicts progression-free and overall survival in high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[30]  Emmanuel Itti,et al.  [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in aggressive lymphoma: an early prognostic tool for predicting patient outcome. , 2005, Blood.

[31]  P. Gaulard,et al.  Long-term results of the R-CHOP study in the treatment of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a study by the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  FDG-PET/CT in re-staging of patients with lymphoma , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[33]  R. Fisher,et al.  Dose-intense chemotherapy every 2 weeks with dose-intense cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone may improve survival in intermediate- and high-grade lymphoma: a phase II study of the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG 9349). , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  P. Dupont,et al.  Early restaging positron emission tomography with ( 18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose predicts outcome in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[35]  P. Dupont,et al.  Prognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) after first-line chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: is [18F]FDG-PET a valid alternative to conventional diagnostic methods? , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[36]  M. González,et al.  BEAM chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell support in lymphoma patients: analysis of efficacy, toxicity and prognostic factors , 1997, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[37]  Emili Montserrat,et al.  A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  I. Lossos,et al.  High incidence of false-positive PET scans in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with rituximab-containing regimens. , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[39]  P. Ziakas,et al.  Unifying the predictive value of pretransplant FDG PET in patients with lymphoma: a review and meta-analysis of published trials , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[40]  R. Wahl,et al.  Integrating PET and PET/CT into the risk-adapted therapy of lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[41]  E. Vellenga,et al.  The role of serial pre-transplantation positron emission tomography in predicting progressive disease in relapsed lymphoma. , 2006, Haematologica.

[42]  Lotty Hooft,et al.  18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography for post-treatment evaluation of malignant lymphoma: a systematic review. , 2006, Haematologica.

[43]  A. F. Sevilla,et al.  High-dose therapy in diffuse large cell lymphoma: results and prognostic factors in 452 patients from the GEL-TAMO Spanish Cooperative Group. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[44]  C. Mayr,et al.  High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation as first-line therapy in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a meta-analysis. , 2003, Haematologica.