Compliant Mechanism Optimization: Analysis and Design with Intrinsic Characteristic Stiffness

Abstract This article focuses on design formulation of compliant mechanisms posed as a topology optimization problem. With the use of linear elasticity theory, a single-input, single-output compliant mechanism is represented by the stiffness matrix of its structure with respect to the input–output ports. It is shown that the stiffness model captures the intrinsic stiffness properties of the mechanism. Furthermore, in order for the optimization problem to be properly defined, it is necessary that the stiffness matrix of the mechanism's structure must be guaranteed to be always positive definite. An exploratory design formulation is then presented based on this necessary condition. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the potential benefits of using the intrinsic stiffness properties for compliant mechanism design with topology optimization techniques.

[1]  G. K. Ananthasuresh,et al.  On an optimal property of compliant topologies , 2000 .

[2]  G. K. Ananthasuresh,et al.  A Comparative Study of the Formulations and Benchmark Problems for the Topology Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms , 2009 .

[3]  Mary Frecker,et al.  Topological synthesis of compliant mechanisms using multi-criteria optimization , 1997 .

[4]  Michael Yu Wang A Kinetoelastic Formulation of Compliant Mechanism Optimization , 2009 .

[5]  Sridhar Kota,et al.  Strategies for systematic synthesis of compliant mems , 1994 .

[6]  Ashok Midha,et al.  An Introduction to Mechanical Advantage in Compliant Mechanisms , 1998 .

[7]  J. Paros How to design flexure hinges , 1965 .

[8]  Qi Xia,et al.  Optimal Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms Using a Connectivity Preserving Level Set Method , 2005 .

[9]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  On the Design of Compliant Mechanisms Using Topology Optimization , 1997 .

[10]  Salam Rahmatalla,et al.  Sparse monolithic compliant mechanisms using continuum structural topology optimization , 2004 .

[11]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Topology Optimization: "Theory, Methods, And Applications" , 2011 .

[12]  Ren-Jye Yang,et al.  Comparison Between the Variational and Implicit Differentiation Approaches to Shape Design Sensitivities , 1986 .

[13]  John Swarbrooke,et al.  Case Study 18 – Las Vegas, Nevada, USA , 2007 .

[14]  G. K. Ananthasuresh,et al.  Design of Distributed Compliant Mechanisms , 2003 .

[15]  Larry L. Howell,et al.  A Loop-Closure Theory for the Analysis and Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms , 1996 .

[16]  Michael Yu Wang,et al.  Design of multimaterial compliant mechanisms using level-set methods , 2005 .

[17]  Michael Yu Wang,et al.  Designing Distributed Compliant Mechanisms With Characteristic Stiffness , 2007 .

[18]  Sridhar Kota,et al.  An Energy Formulation for Parametric Size and Shape Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms , 1999 .

[19]  Noboru Kikuchi,et al.  Design optimization method for compliant mechanisms and material microstructure , 1998 .