The Interaction of Spatial Reference Frames and Hierarchical Object Representations: A Computational Investigation of Drawing in Hemispatial Neglect

In drawing a figure,hemispatial neglect patients typically produce an adequate representation of parts on the right of the figurewhile omitting significantfeatures on the left. This contralateral neglect is influenced by multiple spatial reference frames and by the hierarchical structure of the object(s) in the figure. The current work presents a computational characterization of the interaction among these influences to account for the way in which neglect manifests in drawing. Neglect is simulated by a “lesion” (monotonic drop-off from right to left) that can affect performance in both object-centered and viewer-centered reference frames. The joint effects of neglect in both these frames provide a coherent account of the drawing performance of a patient, JM, and may be extended to account for the copying performance of other patients across a range of objects and scenes.

[1]  J. Driver,et al.  Can Visual Neglect Operate in Object-centred Co-ordinates? An Affirmative Single-case Study , 1991 .

[2]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Mechanisms of Spatial Attention: The Relation of Macrostructure to Microstructure in Parietal Neglect , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  Maureen Dennis,et al.  Clinical Neuropsychology and Brain Function: Research, Measurement, and Practice , 1988 .

[4]  J. Stein.  The representation of egocentric space in the posterior parietal cortex. , 1992, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[5]  S. Palmer.  Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  C. Colby,et al.  The Neuroanatomy and Neurophysiology of Attention , 1991 .

[7]  R. Rafal,et al.  Axis-based neglect of visual shapes , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  B Tversky,et al.  Descriptions and depictions of environments , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Object-Centered Neglect in Patients with Unilateral Neglect: Effects of Left-Right Coordinates of Objects , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Attention to within-object and between-object spatial representations: multiple sites for visual selection , 1994 .

[11]  Geoffrey E. Hinton.  Mapping Part-Whole Hierarchies into Connectionist Networks , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[12]  H. Karnath.  Disturbed coordinate transformation in the neural representation of space as the crucial mechanism leading to neglect , 1994 .

[13]  R Tissot,et al.  Qualitative analysis of unilateral spatial neglect in relation to laterality of cerebral lesions , 1972, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[14]  M. Mozer,et al.  On the Interaction of Selective Attention and Lexical Knowledge: A Connectionist Account of Neglect Dyslexia , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  P. Sommers.  A system for drawing and drawing-related neuropsychology , 1989 .

[16]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Structures and Functions of Selective Attention. , 1987 .

[17]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[18]  Jon Driver,et al.  Grouping reduces visual extinction: Neuropsychological evidence for weight-linkage in visual selection , 1994 .

[19]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Spatial representation of words in the brain implied by studies of a unilateral neglect patient , 1990, Nature.

[20]  S. Kosslyn.  Seeing and Imagining in the Cerebral Hemispheres: A Computational Approach , 1988 .

[21]  A. Young,et al.  Neglect and visual recognition. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.